@esuriospiritus: When was it establish that Dekes was super obvious town? I re-read the thread and while I don't see Dekes as scum, it doesn't mean that she is most certainly town.
@The Master Hand: There are no scum tells that are definitive (Meaning 100% chances of hitting scum), not even claiming scum. Town lynches based off scum claims have had happened before and among the worst of the VI's, it will almost surely happen again, so with an absymal player like Lelouch, even a scum claim requires thinking on whenever or not it is coming from scum. Take for example, millar13 at Mini 988: Small Town Mafia. At the end of Day 3, after being suspected by almost everyone, he gave up, claimed Mafia, but ended up flipping town. I would rank him as about the same as Lelouch VI Britannica in terms of awfulness in play and behavior.
As for the last points, it wasn't that you went after Lelouch, but that you over-exaggerated your attack on him. I don't really think you can properly determine a person as "most likely scum" after one and a half page of analysis of mostly RVS contents, thus my argument for you saying you were grasping for straws.
@danakillsu: The reasoning you're going with is too black and white for this game regarding the Lelouch wagon. Not choosing to lynch Lelouch does not mean they have to acknowledge that he was a troll and you can't just say that "Person X defended Lelouch, he must be scum!", you need to actually analyze the content of the defense to determine whenever or not it had town motivation or scum motivation.
@Pinky and the Brain: By the time you jumped in, there were still plenty of time for you to focus on your primary suspect before the lynch were to occur (At the time you voted, there were twelve days left, plenty of time to push for your primary suspect lynch, not at all unrealistic time frame, no I don't consider absolute VI's like Lelouch claiming scum to be strong enough for a vote based on that alone). It's not as strong since based off your few posts of today, you did prove consistent in your scum read on Tragedy, but it still does concern me.
@Tragedy: How can you justify voting a lurker over a scummy player? Lynching a lurker during Day One would have put us at an even worse situation Day 2, with very little to absolutely nothing to go on, regardless of alignment, and would have been especially bad if said lurker flipped town. You really shouldn't be questioning the town for choosing to vote TheJackalope over a lurker. While his slot did flip town, at least we got some information from it that could determine players alignment.
You say that people are voting you just for lurkers hunting, read mine and other players reasons for suspecting you. It should be obvious that we have more reasons for suspecting you then just that.
@RedCoyote: Regarding your mb53 case, it's genuine but not something I necessarily agree upon. The first and third points are decent, but the others don't really come as really scummy to me and are more like null tells to me. I also disagreeing that bringing up Jesters in a theme game is scummy. I've seen both town and scum use it, so I don't necessarily see as indicative of alignment.
@RedCoyote: By checking completed games, I mean checking recently finished games from six months ago or less. Considering that you're an experienced player, this is more then enough for me to understand your playstyle and how you normally play.
Also, in your response to Dekes about ending Day 1 early, there's one thing in your response to Dekes that I just noticed that also bothers me. You said in that post that we had too many players in the game. Why do you think that? Twenty players in a game is not that huge of a game, considering recently ran games like Star Aligned III (Which had 28 players) and most large games have more.
@Tragedy: I find your "My defense isn't good." to be scummy. From what I see, you're pretty much trying to get people off your back by saying that you did not make a good defense.
Your scummy reactions to Pinky and the Brain's attack on you really does bring you up on my scum list and those of others, along with these two posts I've linked to.
@Lucersia: I understood why you may not have made a full post, but I'm not sure why you couldn't have at least scanned jmj3000's vote count before hammering. Clearly it's not that hard to read a vote count.