A Gentleman's Game of Guile, Subterfuge, and Intrigue (Fin)

[Twistedspoon]

how have I hidden in the shadows?

I have the most posts in this thread

that's hardly hiding in shadows

[Twistedspoon]

Vezok has been at the brandy or is being economical with the truth

both would merit suspicion

[kr0b]

To answer your question, which somewhat rephrased my statement, this was shot down very quickly by Kpaca;

furthermore, I note how your activity has shot up when I suspected you

scumtell in my book

You also conveniently ignored everything Kpaca said in response to you because vezok placed a vote on you.

And I didn't mention vezok. Partly because I think he is talking crap. Partly because it seems as though he's fabricated a reason to vote for you out of thin air.

[Twistedspoon]

And I didn't mention vezok. Partly because I think he is talking crap.

good heavens, sir, but one's language has displaced a large amount of Twinings from my mouth

[vezokpiraka]

And I didn't mention vezok. Partly because I think he is talking crap.

good heavens, sir, but one's language has displaced a large amount of Twinings from my mouth

You should defend about that not post fluff. That just makes me happier with my vote. You are cocky as scum and don't defend. Just like here.

[Twistedspoon]

how have I hidden in the shadows?

I have the most posts in this thread

that's hardly hiding in shadows

this

[Twistedspoon]

And I didn't mention vezok. Partly because I think he is talking crap.

good heavens, sir, but one's language has displaced a large amount of Twinings from my mouth

You should defend about that not post fluff. That just makes me happier with my vote. You are cocky as scum and don't defend. Just like here.

hey

I didn't defend myself in that game you mentioned and I was town in that one; what's up with that :/

kinda the opposite; I defend as scum obviously

[Twistedspoon]

If you continue to scrape the bottom of the barrel for reasons you'll get splinters 'neath your nails

srsly, all you have is meta (and incorrect at that)

[Hoppster]

how have I hidden in the shadows?

I have the most posts in this thread

that's hardly hiding in shadows

this

You should defend about that not post fluff.

Please stop misrepresenting people, Twistedspoon.

furthermore, I note how your activity has shot up when I suspected you

scumtell in my book

O, this post does cause me much merriment (ho-ho!).

In the last two days (from here to here), where people have been attacking you, you have posted 19 by my counting. Previously, over more than a week, you have 35 posts. That looks like activity shooting up (which is people in glass houses throwing stones in my book).

If you continue to scrape the bottom of the barrel for reasons you'll get splinters 'neath your nails

srsly, all you have is meta (and incorrect at that)

I will hastily refer you back to the second quotation that can be found in the top of this post.

[Twistedspoon]

how have I hidden in the shadows?

I have the most posts in this thread

that's hardly hiding in shadows

this

You should defend about that not post fluff.

Please stop misrepresenting people, Twistedspoon.

vezok said I was lurking

I refuted that

how on earth is that misrepresenting?

[TheLonging]

I have yet to make a more detailed background check on TheLonging to see what his stance on policy lynches has been on past games, but for now I can say that I do not like this type of damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't argumentation.

I don't know what I was like back in the past (2010), but my current stance: they are good if they are warranted or if I know the player enough to agree with reasons for a PL.

[TheLonging]

how have I hidden in the shadows?

I have the most posts in this thread

that's hardly hiding in shadows

I'll be back later to count how much of this is fluff

[Twistedspoon]

how have I hidden in the shadows?

I have the most posts in this thread

that's hardly hiding in shadows

I'll be back later to count how much of this is fluff

fluff or not, it's hardly 'hiding in the shadows' whatever that means

[Hoppster]

vezok said I was lurking

I refuted that

how on earth is that misrepresenting?

Spoiler: Response to the above post - QUOTE HEAVY

And I didn't mention vezok. Partly because I think he is talking crap.

good heavens, sir, but one's language has displaced a large amount of Twinings from my mouth

You should defend about that not post fluff. That just makes me happier with my vote. You are cocky as scum and don't defend. Just like here.

how have I hidden in the shadows?

I have the most posts in this thread

that's hardly hiding in shadows

this

You should defend about that not post fluff.

how have I hidden in the shadows?

I have the most posts in this thread

that's hardly hiding in shadows

You should ... not post fluff.

I have the most posts in this thread

Your posts contain fluff.

But I'm posting so much!

YOU POST FLUFF.

TEEEHEE NO I'M NOT LURKING I'M SO ACTIVE SEE!?!?!?!!22222222221!

[Twistedspoon]

well if I'm posting I'm hardly hiding in the shadows as vezok puts it. He should've been clearer. I was refuting lurking, not active lurking (which I would like to refute, but is harder to do so)

and not all of my posts have been fluff, you only chose the fluffiest mr. selective
notice how in each game you tunnel on me, hoppster, I flip town?

lurking =/= active lurking, so why bring all that up?

[Hoppster]

Please stop misrepresenting people, Twistedspoon.

That's why I brought it up. The clue is that I said it as I brought it up.


Please also refer back to this post regarding the hypocrisy of your kpaca accusations, and comment on them for me, thanks.

[Twistedspoon]

no

bad things happen to me when I answer your posts

they're all traps D:

example:

hoppster votes me at start

then hoppster takes his vote off of me in post 39 and sticks it on vezok before placing it back on me after 1 post in which I only give a link to wikipedia

you say

kr0b, I most graciously invite you to join TheLonging's most excellent wagon on vezokpiraka.

and then vote vezok

I post

Source B: After consulting my most learned colleague I have concluded that, accurately speaking (and of course we wouldn't want to speak inaccurately where possible), that the Sun is neither hot nor cold

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

second paragraph, line number 5

which is completely irrelevant to the game and is just about the sun

then somehow after that you STRAIGHT AFTER come up with

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Twistedspoon

This vote is not one that I have cast in a random manner. Discuss.

backpeddal much?

not that you explain your vote at all

you then say how I didn't comment on your vote switch to vezok. Well why should I have? I'd already given my thoughts on vezok. And had I commented for some bizzare reason you'd call it scum paranoia for commenting on a vote being taken off of me

your full of tricks and tunnel on me all the time whilst defending the players you know are town or are your buddies since you're mafioso. That way you get everyone against me

well not again

VOTE:

Sir

hoppster

[Hoppster]

then somehow after that you STRAIGHT AFTER come up with

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Twistedspoon

This vote is not one that I have cast in a random manner. Discuss.

backpeddal much?

not that you explain your vote at all

Firstly:

Twisted, you found yourself compelled to continue talking about fluff yet ignored a forming non-random bandwagon?

A recent quote, explaining why I changed my vote (which btw you ignored).

Secondly, I intentionally didn't explain my vote. I was using it to: a) Pursue a suspicion, b) Generate reads from the reactions of others (HENCE 'DISCUSS').

It's not backpedalling, BECAUSE I HAD A REASON.

you then say how I didn't comment on your vote switch to vezok. Well why should I have?

See above.

your full of tricks and tunnel on me all the time whilst defending the players you know are town or are your buddies since you're mafioso. That way you get everyone against me

Okay José. Tell me then, is kpaca my buddy? Is vezok my buddy?

[Twistedspoon]

It's not backpedalling, BECAUSE I HAD A REASON.

no you didn't

you backpeddaled because you were scum obv

If you're gambiting you should at least breadcrumb it in advance

your full of tricks and tunnel on me all the time whilst defending the players you know are town or are your buddies since you're mafioso. That way you get everyone against me

Okay José. Tell me then, is kpaca my buddy? Is vezok my buddy?

stop deflecting. I'll cross that bridge when I get to it but for now methinks you're mafia pushing an easy lynch in myself
Asking me who your buddy is will only get me to appear scummier should I be wrong about said buddy or even right, but another player has them as a town read

VOTE:

Sir

Hoppster

[Hoppster]

I would like to express my appreciation to the Omnipotent One for ensuring that I am referred to as according to my proper titles.

It's not backpedalling, BECAUSE I HAD A REASON.

no you didn't

you backpeddaled because you were scum obv

If you're gambiting you should at least breadcrumb it in advance

'Twas not a gambit in any way, shape, or form. I have just provided a reason. Tell me why that reason is inadequate.

stop deflecting. I'll cross that bridge when I get to it but for now methinks you're mafia pushing an easy lynch in myself
Asking me who your buddy is will only get me to appear scummier should I be wrong about said buddy or even right, but another player has them as a town read

Dearie me, what have we here? In what way am I deflecting? It is perfectly relevant to the point you were making.

Regardless, you are the only person deflecting here. You have ignored this:

furthermore, I note how your activity has shot up when I suspected you

scumtell in my book

O, this post does cause me much merriment (ho-ho!).

In the last two days (from here to here), where people have been attacking you, you have posted 19 by my counting. Previously, over more than a week, you have 35 posts. That looks like activity shooting up (which is people in glass houses throwing stones in my book).

And also this:

Twisted, you found yourself compelled to continue talking about fluff yet ignored a forming non-random bandwagon?

A recent quote, explaining why I changed my vote (which btw you ignored).

And what makes you think yourself to be an easy lynch?

[Twistedspoon]

Dearie me, what have we here? In what way am I deflecting? It is perfectly relevant to the point you were making.

no it wasn't. My beginners guide to mafia says it's unwise to try and guess the scumteam D1

It says; I quote

Do not fool yourself into thinking you can call the scumteam, especially before anyone has flipped scum. Don't bother with trying to draw connections between players until one of them is dead. It's tempting! but futile.

so yeah, another trap of yours, trying to get me to guess the scumteam

You have ignored this

yeah, and I've explained why I don't like your questions in general. Traps like the last one

'Twas not a gambit in any way, shape, or form. I have just provided a reason. Tell me why that reason is inadequate.

you provided a reason which you 'concealed' at the time; thus a gambit of sorts. If not a gambit in your book, then you should have still breadcrumbed it to stop it appearing like backpeddaling

for me to believe you had this reason is a far stretch

And what makes you think yourself to be an easy lynch?

because you know how to annoy me

[Hoppster]

Gambit - no, it was certainly most not a gambit. The reasoning is plainly obvious to all those paying attention (apart from perhaps yourself). I will then ask you this if you refuse to answer my other outstanding questions - for what reason did you not discuss my vote despite my prompting to do so?

Coming out of RVS, did you not feel it appropiate to stop with the fluff? Or did you think we were still in RVS?

Kr0b freaked out because of a vote and asked for reasons. Townies don't do that. I didn't give reasons because I wanted to see his reaction. He is

still

scum.

vezok, I am (most logically, if I may say so myself) inferring from the above quotation (which I most correctly am attributing to your self) that you must have had a reason for voting kr0b and thinking him not a good fellow

before

the results of your so-called 'test' (ho-ho!). I have taken the liberty of adding boldened emphasis to show my line of reasoning - you said he was

still

scum, what made him scum before, I must ask?

Also, if I may ask, what is your take on Twistedspoon?

Next time you post, vezok, it would stand you in good stead to answer this if you will.


Post after post, Twistedspoon, you seem to be expressing intent to ignore all my questions. Tell me (if you will) - is this an attitude you will adopt with all your scum-reads?

[Twistedspoon]

is this an attitude you will adopt with all your scum-reads?

no, just you

and you ignored the bit about how asking me who your buddies were is a silly question

for what reason did you not discuss my vote despite my prompting to do so?

your 10 second vezok vote?
1) you didn't give me the chance. 1 post later you had it back
2) why should I discuss every vote change you make? I assumed you wanted in on the PL of vezok. Little did I know that you'd expect me to somehow come up with a thesis on one of your more discreet actions. It's not like you even asked me what I thought of your vote at the time :/

[Apokalyptika]

Good heavens. I feel the need to

Unvote

and

Vote: Sir Twistedspoon

with all due alacrity. Not only has he misrepresented other members of the company and changed his reasoning for his vote many times (first he votes kpaca for contradicting himself, then for not wanting a policy lynch?), but he refuses to answer questions posed to him. In addition, I have happened to see him posting as scum elsewhere (the game is ongoing, but both Sir Twisted and myself are deceased) and, while I have not yet done a complete meta check, his posting styleis strikingly similar.

[Twistedspoon]

I knew this would happen

'Tis the devilish works of Sir Hoppster

make sure you lynch him after myself before he does the same to another townie :0