Equinox only really crumbed his rolename, not role so I don't see how that's tactical in any way. Scum have fakeclaims, mods are able to give main characters to scum, so he's not putting himself in any hole by talking like somepony in particular.
Gammagooey wrote:Jahudo I know that fluttershy is a character and etc.etc. But the first section of the post is the same thing that Rhinoz pulled back in objection mafia with Vi
Yeah, I thought Rhinox was scummy for that too but the difference is that his declaration looked serious because it was about a player playing. Mine had no intention of looking serious because it was only about a name.
Gammagooey wrote:I actually personally think that not RVS voting is generally slightly more likely to scum from town given cautious scum/aggressive town.
Cautious scum try to fit in with the crowd so why would they not do something that most people do? I think its null because placing a random vote requires no strategy or foresight. There is no wrong answer so scum wouldn't have any reason to consider a "right" move.
--
inHimshallibe wrote:*Jahudo: I understand the jokes. ( :thumbup: to Jahudo ). but what is this about policy lynching chesskid? ( :thumbdown: to Jahudo ).
Fluttershy's call of policy lynch looked serious enough to respond in a serious manner. I do believe that chesskid is a good player and would know there is no foreseeable advantage to actually no lynch, which made it a clear joke, which meant there was no serious reason to suggest a no lynch. Also your posting style is hard to follow, some sections don't seem to have any point but if its just getting jokes out of the way early okay.