Post bomb incoming … duck and cover!!!!
--
I’m going to put this at the Top so everyone can see.
DK is a VI
. Absolutely no doubt about it.
I’ve played with him in two games.
Superhero Mafia – he was basically Policy lynched for acting like he is here, Governed by a Mafia team for kicks (DK was VT), and vigged N1.
Umbrage’s Jungle Republic – Played much like he did so far this game (pointless statements about his alignment and whining how Scum sided the game was, OMGUS all over the place, and posting worse than Shotty in his prime). He survived to endgame as Stupid Town and made a post 24 hours after the GM posted the endgame advocating who should be lynched.
DK is absolutely a policy lynch regardless of his play. You will never get a read on him being truly scummy because his play is 100% scummy regardless of his alignment.
And I am 100% on board with doing so if my 'Running Crew' think him over xvart is the way to go.
@Spyrex, CoolDoG, KK
– I’ll join on DK if you all think it wise to lynch him in light of what I said above. Otherwise I think xvart is our number 1 target otherwise. Agree?
Otherwise my little friend might take care of the DK living issue for us.
--
CoolDoG wrote:Xvart, DK, Rikana (something bugs me about her, for some reason.) scum team anybody?
I’m completely on board with 2 of those 3. DK? As stated above … only Mod knows. But he has to die well before endgame.
--
Deathnote wrote:poor DK. You need to learn to be more like me and not base your own thoughts or attempt to appear town. Just follow someone who you think is town and then you wouldn't appear scummy to everyone else. Advice from one bad player to another.
Funny but you look like scum in the one game we played together. Then again you were.
If DK is just VI Town then Deathnote is scum.
--
Juls wrote:Blah. you suck, I hate you. not really
Unvote
Rule 4 Juls. The small text of ‘not really’, while funny, is not kosher.
Please return your vote to scum xvart though.
--
KK wrote: I was thinking that you, me, & MagnaofIllusion could join forces in a voting block.
At this stage I agree to the revised block of Spyrex, MoI, KK and CooLDoG.
I also have a strong Townread on my Sekrit friend due to QT posting that means I have 4 solid Town to work with. Sweet!
--
xvart wrote:It is simply put, because in any permutation of how many letters, words, or syllables he adds I do not believe it.
This little nugget, drawn from 951, is exactly why xvart is scum. He’s not voting Reaper for scummy votes. Or any scummy actions outside his “it seems made-up” stance and taking every action of Reaper and framing it in that context. He's voting on what he thinks is an easy attack - improbability of actual post restriction from a rather controversial target.
When today started I planted a little seed. I saw Reaper’s posts and thought to myself – whut? Why does he have three syllables? So I went back and read Reaper’s posts in ISO and saw the “1 per PHASE” explanation.
So I decided to throw out a line to see if anyone would bite. I posted my “Hey, what’s up RC?” line in my first post to see if anyone would run with the inference that Reaper wasn’t being consistent.
And xvart took that line and ran with it like a Marlin on steroids. Didn’t even bother to do what I did and see what the claim was.
Now he’s caught in a scummy web and keeps flailing about, hoping his take that Reaper’s Post Restriction has to be faked and trying to make everything Reaper does look scummy in regards to the claimed restriction.
Sometime in the next 48 I’m going to go back and see what other gems I can find in xvart’s rather meager ISO from Day 1.
xvart wrote:But the modifying part of his post restriction and the how that developed is what is keeping my vote. I did not remember it being one syllable per phase; I thought it was per day.
Oh, so your faulty memory is why your vote is staying, despite the fact that it was clearly stated by Reaper Day 1 the situation?
God you don’t like playing scum do you xvart.
xvart wrote:Plus, being in Storm of Swords mafia I'm not too hip on post restrictions and letting people skate by because of that.
This ties back into the very first quote I highlighted and why you are scum – you are using ASOS as a crutch to make a vote on RC when you haven’t given reason 1 why his play is scummy other than ‘I think he’s fake-posting”.
xvart wrote:The only person at this point I would consider voting is Rikana, for the reasons I mentioned yesterday. Voting YamiChan to give pressure and then saying later saying she doesn't need pressure because she'll obviously flail. It appears to me that he was just trying to get her into a spot where she would flail (knowing she would flail) to derail D1.
Oh so Rikana is scummy for his play but you’d rather vote Reaper. Thanks for that little relational nugget xvart. Possbile FOS- Partner, Vote Town in the House!!!!!
xvart wrote:This was anti climatic...
Oh, I’m sure it was. When you are hoping for more role-fishing chances when you are caught scum finding out it was pure, 100% scum-hunting that hangs / vigs you must be annoying.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.