@Quilford
– I have a question for you. Do you support Town directed Executions if you are going to be the Executioner?
--
Sleepy wrote:I can't tell yet. My gut says so, but I think it's just butthurt that you're attacking me.
Sleepy wrote:Okay, mod can't be elected, cool.
VOTE: MoI
Sleepy wrote: Magna is null,
This series of posts by Sleepy really makes me think he is scum. Before he was at the bottom of my list. Captian and Cod read as more scum motivated than Sleepy. However …
1. Sleepy hammers Quilford for “defending” Vezok.
2. I swoop in and lay down the smack on his Vezok is scum argument (much the same as what Quilford was going).
3. He does his utmost to disengage from direct conflict with me (not answering specific inquires like my post about his “Contradiction” and generally does everything he can to make me ‘go away’.
4. When I directly ask him if I am scum for defending Vezok he fence-sits on it (saying his Gut says yes but he might just be Butthurt).
5. He then votes for me to be the Executioner.
6. When pressed on it later he says I am a Null read.
I see this pattern as a huge case of ‘Appeasement’. I’ve directly said that his “Contradiction” catch isn’t a catch at all and called his other posts not scum-hunting. Town doesn’t have a reason to back off what they think is a valid tell in the manner he has.
Town certainly has no motivation to vote a Null read as Executioner. Especially one they have a gut ‘Scum’ read on. Hell, even if he doubts his Gut scum read he'd be better voting for himself (who he should know as Town) as opposed to lobbing a vote my way in hopes it will distract me like a shiny bobble.
So Sleepy moves to the top of my “Want to see Executed / Will Execute” list.
--
Vezok wrote:As for NK: Don't choose the same executioner as the day one. It's one of the worst tactics.
I am going to disagree with this from the standpoint that if a Day Executioner hits scum with the execution I see no reason to NOT make them the Night Executioner.
--
Jason wrote:MOIs case against SK is a lot better than anything Quilford has produced so far on SK. I am still not sold on SK scum, but it is a convincing arguement by MOI.
Jason you were on a hot streak there in providing quality posts with content. Don’t backslide into fence-sitting like this and make me question my Town initial read on you.
--
Implosion wrote:Selfvoting up until this point (since at this point I'm stating this outright) should be taken as a minor towntell. It would feel awkward to scum moreso than to town, i feel.
I like much of what you have posted in your walls but this makes zero sense. Self-voting is a Null tell. Either alignment has reason to do so … because they know their own win-con is furthered to some degree when the Execution is in the hands of a known alignment (aka their own).
Now certainly scum will not be shy about supporting a fellow scum since they have more information to work with but self-voting isn’t a Town tell at all (if you put any credence in them, which I don’t).
--
Zang wrote:Magna- What do you think of Quilford? you don't really mention him in your post but later, you call him town.
I get a Town read so far on Quilford because his reaction to the early “Vezok contradiction” post by Sleepy and Cod are very similar to my own. Thus he’s approaching the game from a similar mindset.
I don’t generally feel the need to fluff up my posts making comments about how his CAPS RAGING is pointless and anti-productive. It clearly is. But it certainly isn’t a scum-tell worth discussing.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
) and would do whatever he felt was best (for him).
