Oversoul wrote:Haters gonna hate
This was in response to suspecion. no question why? no scumhunting? no ANYTHING?
nope. "OH LOOK PPL SUSPECT ME LOLHATERSGONNAHATE"
This is not a town slot.
This is not policy.
This is not a drill.
He hangs.
Let's go.
Oversoul wrote:Haters gonna hate
Vifam wrote:Bomberman wrote:Oversoul wrote:I left this window open in another tab while I farted around on YouTube.
So you're gonna ignore my unvote then?
vote: Oversoul
Scum vote, guys.
Scum vote.
redFF wrote:Estyn wrote:1. Empking - Town
2. Kcdaspot - Scum, not liking your posts until about 2 pages ago
3. Estyn - Town
4. Xeras - Null
5. Foolish Fool (Haylen + JordanA24) - Town
6. mastin2 - Town
7. Vifam - Null leaning town, still don't like that argument between you and Johhog though
8. BomberMan - Null leaning scum
9. Fool_Hardy - Null leaning town
10. David Xanatos - Scum, don't like you not answering questions
11. Oversoul - Null leaning town, self voting doesn't sit well with me though, don't know why you would do that.
14. LordChronos - Null
15. Johhog - Town, don't like that argument between you and vifam though
16. LTP Mafia - Null
17. Secret Project (evilpacman18 + MrBump) - Scum
20. redFF - Null leaning town
Ommitted people haven't posted yet, i skim read the last 6 pages or so, may have missed a post by them.
Does anybody else think these kinda posts are scummy as hell? I mean it's just getting a list of all the players, saying town about players who are considered pro-town at the time by the thread and scum about players considered scummy at the time by the thread. And then null leaning x about players who haven't really been looked at by anyone. If you gave reasons for reads then maybe but these posts just set off alarms in my head.
Vifam wrote:All these fucking counterwagons.
Someone do a manual vote count.
Oversoul wrote:I am here again.
UNVOTE:
Can't believe it took a self vote on myself for you all to realize that I'm not scum.
KC/Bomberman, what questions do I have to answer?
Secret Project wrote:Estyn wrote:VT...
Estyn wrote:Stating your reads on each person and joke claiming are completely different things, i don't see the connection
1. Joke claiming? So you're NOT a VT?
2. I think the point was that claiming gives scum more useful NK information than stating reads.
LordChronos wrote:Specifically, this post (SP's ISO 6, #227):
Secret Project wrote:Estyn wrote:VT...
Estyn wrote:Stating your reads on each person and joke claiming are completely different things, i don't see the connection
1. Joke claiming? So you're NOT a VT?
2. I think the point was that claiming gives scum more useful NK information than stating reads.
'Cause you asked.Secret wrote:why can't we be Soben?