Execution Mafia: Days of the Cold War GAMEOVER

[implosion]

Jesus I forgot all my reads.
implosion is scum right?

VOTE: implosion

[Cosca]

VOTE: implosion

You stated...

implosion suddenly changing from not relevant to top scumread (ISO #50, #64)

Top scumread BESIDES Quil. Reads change. I gave my reason.

Quil is your top scum read, with Implosion being your second.

Now you have voted Implosion I would like to know what brought Quil down in the scum reads and/or what brought Implosion up in the scum reads. I noticed you made a post saying that you forgot all of your reads but remember that Implosion is scum. You then waited a little less than a day before voting Implosion. In the timeframe of that 23 hours I would expect someone as active on this site as you to have gathered your thoughts since you surely have the time to, so if that excuse was good before, and it wasn't, it isn't good anymore.

- Junpei

[SleepyKrew]

Forgetting my reads was a joke.
Do you know the mechanic of this game Junpei? Sounds like you don't.

[Cosca]

Forgetting my reads was a joke.
Do you know the mechanic of this game Junpei? Sounds like you don't.

I know, I made an incorrect error when I mentioned Witch Kills. However Iceguy corrected me in private, I apologize for the mix up, I fully understand setup mechanics now, my paper theory still stands though, minus the witch kills. I will try to confer with Iceguy more in my posting, although he is LA these next few days so I will probably on most things just speak up.

I noticed you failed to respond to my earlier stated questions, SleepyKrew, I'd appreciate it if you could get to explaining the vote, as you seem to have not forgotten your reads after all.

- Junpei

[SleepyKrew]

I know I didn't explain why I'm voting a strong scumread.

[Cosca]

I know I didn't explain why I'm voting a strong scumread.

I cannot be bothered to play this cat and mouse game SK, where you be purposefully difficult and waste perfectly good thread space. I said explain why you are voting Implosion, your number two, over Quilford, your number 1 scum read. What changed? Please respond in detail so no one has to ask again.

- Junpei

[SleepyKrew]

You forgot the mechanics again...
And I'll explain my vote in due time. If I was going to answer, I would've answered by now.

[Cosca]

Ah yes, we elect an executioner whom will make the kill for us. I will now retreat into my hydra cave and post a sticky note on the rock outside that I should consult Iceguy and read the OP more.

[SleepyKrew]

So then what did you get clarified before?
Also, posting a sticky outside doesn't help if you're inside.

[Cosca]

So then what did you get clarified before?
Also, posting a sticky outside doesn't help if you're inside.

I feel like I"m making too many solo posts, but I thought that witches had a kill. I think in my intro post where I said my paper theory something along the lines of... well here I'll go grab the quote for you.

[quote="Cosca"
If the witches kill someone with paper, the witch who submitted the kill gets the paper. This way it is possible for witches to start the game with paper, while it also having some incentive to give paper through some sort of plan.
- Junpei[/quote]

Iso number 2

Iceguy clarified it for me.

- Junpei

[Zang]

I know I didn't explain why I'm voting a strong scumread

Why aren't you explaining it now? What reason could you have for voting for you're biggest scum read?

[SleepyKrew]

Second biggest and it's a secret.

[Quilford]

VOTE: Quilford

It's a secret.

[SleepyKrew]

Oh you.

[Quilford]

Oh me.

[Cosca]

Here are our reads, in descending order of scumminess:
Scum:
- jason. We will explain our case on him in our next post.

Leaning scum:
- vezok. Got elected and coasted his way to the misexecution.
- Tragedy. Didn't like her failure to follow through with posting her reads. Some reads were waffles or not very descriptive. Like Codfish or IceGuy. Other two reads are scum reads.

Neutral:
- MoI. Has lurked too much on day 2 for our tastes.

Leaning town:
- CC. After rereading, we can agree that he might be stupid and anti-townish, BUT he seems earnest. It's WIFOM. Is scum really going to be THAT stupid and do obvious anti-town things like "I'm keeping my paper"?
- SK: We have an indication his town PR claim is real.

Town:
- Zang. No scum is going to do such a ton of work if he knows he's going to get a misexecution anyway.
- Quilford: Early on capsrage and previous agony looked like frustrated town that people couldn't see what he saw.
- implosion: Strong scumhunting providing solid logic to move the day along.

No read:
- Scumhunter. Will hold off read until he actually posts.

- IceGuy

[SleepyKrew]

MoI's been lurking D2? yah no

[Tragedy]

Basically, I'm scummy because...
1) I failed to be descriptive with my reads.
2) Failed to post all my reads well
3) Because I had scum reads while I had terrible description along the way.

That's just being Neutral, not scummy, when it comes to being undescriptive about my reads. Hmmm.

[Cosca]

Jason Case

Jason, this post is bad
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#p3280264
- See Quilfords' Post

A few issues here
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 6#p3280756
- Skipping the first two paragraphs that have nothing to do with scumhunting (but I understand why you wrote them, pure appeal to emotion), the Vezok "scum claim" was an obvious obvious joke. I do not possess enough hands for all the facepalms I had when I read that people were interpreting it as Vezok confessing to being a witch. Which makes SK post unjustified.

- There was no wifom Jason... it was an obvious joke...
- Did you miss the part where Cod buddies SK and attacks Quilford? COD IS TOWN
- Hi waffle maker. I noticed you waffled on whether Vezok was a good Executioner as well as whether MoI was too!
- Codfish said "leaning VI/Townie", and Vezok had posted 9 times before that post, Jason.
- Agree 100% on the Vezok not contradicting himself there
- He hardly pushed the wagon -.- Basically said he wanted executioner to kill Cod, wasn't campaigning for Vezok...
- Ugh, I am fairly confident that what Vezok meant when he said "Why am I not open to discussion?" was, paraphrased, "Why am I not a possibility for executioner?".
- Yes cod isn't looking good, but not for the points you pointed out.
- Jason, that wasn't pro-Vezok that was just saying he wanted Cod dead...
- Yes kill on scumminess, excellent point (finally I can agree with you again)
- Natural of contradictions, type of contradiction, etc. This has been explained by someone else I believe
- Yes it is a fair point, why are you saying it is a fair point, there's no reason to voice agreeing with him, that isn't even something up for discussion.
- Vezok clings to MoI every game they're in together, I'm pretty sure this is true, not sure why Vezok hasn't pointed it out yet.
- More filler~~ No one cares how you feel about his attitude
- So Vezok is town for 1) voting MoI and 2) Linking past games
- "This is where Quil starts to slip" indicates that you read through it before posting. However earlier you posted "How could codfish have a town read on Vezok?" And then right after, "OK, he tries to explain it in 31", which indicates you are writing this down as you read.

Why is this?

Oh Jason, you can't "know if someone is town" this early. Vezok was just his towniest read, and you are using that bad interpetation of Quilfords' post again.

Then Jason engages in a back in forth with Quilford and then posts reads at the end of the post.

Basically, Jason as terrible logic all throughout this post, like, it's bad.

Beating down on Quilford for no reason
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 3#p3282173

Talking backhand to Quilford for no reason
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#p3282174

Capsrage means Quilford never executioner?
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 6#p3289246
- So Jason basically what you're trying to do here is take 1 town out of the election equation to raise the odds for your witches to be executioner? This was a few days after the capslock ordeal so Jason has no reason to still be upset over it this much.

Not sure what to head this one
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p3289778
- Some back and forths, then changes read on Quilford for meta reasons he can discuss.
- Oh, the capslock literally gives you head aches to the point where you can no longer comprehend the ideas written on the page? It's that big a deal for you?
- PROMISES UPDATED READS TOMORROW OMG

Blatant misrep
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#p3289964
- Votes Vezok, he "trusts him to do the town thing", anyone else laugh when they read that?
- Oh and he pretends not to see the sarcasm in Quilfords post.

Misreps MoI
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p3291118

Trust' MoI's scum hunting abilities, oh that's why he voted him
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 6#p3291126
- But wait if you have him as null then you don't really think he's town which translates to you trusting his judgment?

DeJa Vu
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 2#p3291192
- Yeah Jason you already said this.

Posts 229 - 232, read them and tell me Jason isn't being silly.



Jason's reads, I wish he had done more than just respond to the question of 2 top scum reads. OH WAIT FOLKS REMEMBER WHEN HE SAID "I'LL POST MY READS TOMORROW"? WHERE ARE THEY JASON~~
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p3295658

Why do you have to tunnelvision on what Quil says? Yes I know you interacted with SK and CC a little, but for the most part, only Quilford. And can you stop bringing up the Rageposting, AtE much?
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p3306218

Stop persisting to AtE
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 2#p3306292

Reads aren't that detailed, but at least it's something, only took, how many days was that?
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 6#p3310056

Overall Jason has exercized little use of logic and reasoning early on tunneling completely on Quilford seemingly all for capslocking (appeal to emotion) and seeming to never get over it. We think he is the most likely scum in this game and a scum flip will lead us to the other scum players.

MoI's been lurking D2? yah no

Yah yes. He only posted the vote tally and one question to Tragedy.

Basically, I'm scummy because...
1) I failed to be descriptive with my reads.
2) Failed to post all my reads well
3) Because I had scum reads while I had terrible description along the way.

That's just being Neutral, not scummy, when it comes to being undescriptive about my reads. Hmmm.

Try 1) Failed to be descriptive with your reads
2) Failed to post most of your reads (got 4 down)
3) Posted 2 waffles and 2 scum reads. And one of your reads was on the guy who was about to get shot, and it was neutral. This is CLEAR distancing from the misexecution.

Also it's interesting that you seem to be content with a neutral read and don't assert your towniness. And you still failed to answer MoI's question.

- Junpei

[Tragedy]

I answered MOI's question a few posts ago.

I found Fitz scummy.
But I wanted my questions answered (At the Least).
Then him flipping town and being executed at night which wasn't something I wasn't truly expecting (Especially when SK's on most people's SCUM LIST).
If it was 'faked', I would have at least EXPECTED Fitz to be executed in your hands, which I didn't. :/

But why'd you choose to kill Fitz, anwyays, MOI?

[SleepyKrew]

Day Two started how long ago? Yah no.

PEDIT: Tragedy, I ask you again, what was faked?

[Tragedy]

Day Two started how long ago? Yah no.

PEDIT: Tragedy, I ask you again, what was faked?

My reaction towards Fitz being dead.

[Cosca]

Day Two started how long ago? Yah no.

Compare his activity on D1 with his activity on D2 and you'll see what we mean.

Tragedy, full set of reads please.

- IceGuy

[SleepyKrew]

Day 2 literally started two days ago. You could call plenty of people "lurkers".

[Cosca]

Compare his activity on D1 with his activity on D2 and you'll see what we mean.

- IceGuy