MagnaofIllusion wrote:
No, I don’t. I’ve done plenty of explaining why your actions are scummy. Which you yourself ignore.
Throughout our whole debate you have simply taken things that we have done and labeled them as "scumtastic" without an explanation. Sometimes, you even did the same things yourself.
That's not explaining; that's accusing in an unfounded way. And since the attacks have started after we have expressed light suspicions of you and intensified as our suspicions grew stronger, we all know why you showed this behavior.
No, it’s a clarification. We can go round and round like this all day … stating things that you can’t back up doesn’t make them true. I typed up my response to Scumhunter's fake-claim in two minutes as that time of night I don't have the ability to make detailed posts. I don't particularly care whether you believe me since your play is pretty much scum-tunneling.
Here are the quotes again so everybody can see how MoI is lying:
ISO #39:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:
ATTENTION EVERYONE
- It is him or me today. Not other Executioner votes are going to be acceptable at this juncture.
ISO #41:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Ok, perhaps in my quick reply last night before bed I didn’t phrase it as clearly as I should have.
No other votes for WHO to be executed are acceptable.
So you’ve basically filtered everything through a perspective of “MoI is scum to construct this”. Noted.
In the scum-MoI scenario, yes, because that scenario is based on you being scum. In the town-MoI scenario, no.
I’m really curious which of these you’d like to debate.
As to your ‘scum-perspective’ I’ve bolded the part that is shows you aren’t being objective. Every bit of it MUST be premised on the fact that I am scum. That bolded argument can be applied to anyone who had a preference between the two 'cop' results (one of which was obviously fake), including yourself
On one hand, if you are town then the assumptions that you have to make to see Scumhunter as scum can't be made into much of a list. However in order to take Quilford as scum (in a way that would make you prefer his execution over Scumhunter) you have to make many, many more assumptions. It isn't that prefering Quilford over Scumhunter is scummy for everyone, just you, since town-MoI is confirmed town to himself.
Cosca wrote:Sometimes, Quilford is the only acceptable execution
; sometimes, Quilford is preferred, sometimes, you'd only be willing to go along with his execution if more players agree. You even managed to contradict yourself in one post.
The bolded is a pure, unadulterated lie.
Please directly quote the post where I say Quilford is the ONLY acceptable execution. Do it. You can’t. I never use that phrase. Nice attempt to infer a contradiction that doesn’t exist.
Again, the quote, from ISO #41:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:
I support Zang for Day Executioner to kill Quilford. If Quilford flips scum we elect him again and he executes fake-claiming Scumhunter.
As we also mentioned, you contradicted yourself in the same post.
