Hiraki wrote
K. But that's totally assumptive, so it's a shitty gut read. Which is usually a shitty scum gut read.
You shouldn't have done it in the first place then...
Both of these are stupid.
I
Hiraki wrote
have logic behind me. All you have is relations that may lead to something. I have more concrete. Am I assuming in some way? Yes, of course. Who has more force behind them? Me.
Logic lol?. you have no logic. all your doing is " OH I BELIEVE PANDA IS SCUM SO I ISO HIM AND USE ALL HIS POSTS AND MISREP HIM AND TUNNEL HIM AND ALSO CAST A LITTLE BULLSHIT ALONG THE WAY SO I GET WHAT I WANT " yea nice force.
Hiraki wrote
Would've been useful if I knew.
I'm not allowed to assume, kthx.
Hiraki wrote
Then what did you agree with?
Because you can't agree with any part of that post but the last line.
You seriously can't.
I did mention the post but maybe you i need to show you since your obviously reading everything out of context.
↑ Robocopter87 wrote:OK. Got a case.
This is why you should be voting hiplop:
Lets start off with his vote. He votes haoala. His reason? He doesn't put one. People have voted before him at haoala. Note this. For this makes this vote a bandwagon vote. Hiplop looks scum. haoala did something scummy. So I said, "Bus Much?"
His terrible response was this (Also, I'm not taking anything you say as a joke. You trying to be cool like Fate or Elli and them isn't working. It makes you look bad. Also, those guys are actually hunting scum. And they do it pretty good too. They, unlike you, actually make cases and give reasons. Even if they are difficult about it. So please, save yourself the embarrassment. Because you look awful.),
Again, no reason. Helps no one at all.
Then,
He changes votes in the blink of an eye. Again, he doesn't give any reasons. I see nothing scummy about numberqs actions. And even if I did take his actions as scummy. This is barely enough for me to vote numberq or present the idea of his lynch.
Because his antics are just making him look bad, I tell him to stop his nonsense.
↑ hiplop wrote:↑ Robocopter87 wrote:No. You need to stop this stuff you are doing.
Why is that an obvious scum post? numberQ is totally right. Though I don't really think DH jumped on the wagon rather than he just wasn't here to post first.
So. Please. Why is it an obvious scum post?
no thank you
the content doesnt matter, its the way he phrased it. NEWBSCUM etc
The way he phrased it. The way he phrased it was enough for you to say "Lets kill this guy shall we?" Really?
Also, notice the refusal to cooperate. I don't think its indicative of his alignment. However, it is anti town because hes just being stubborn, not realeasing info due to thinking hes cool.
Again again and again and again he has failed toExplainwhy it is scummy/not town.
Or its newbtown. I can easily see this as a "nervous that people will think hes stupid if he says the wrong thing." You are jumping to conclusions that aren't found in evidence. Its as easy that hes newbtown as he is newbscum.
↑ hiplop wrote:
o_O Not sure if serious
Was a RV on haoala, i found ACTUAL SCUMMY BEHAVIOR, I lead a wagon on NumberQ. Its the way the game works.
He is serious. You switched votes right after I called you out on it. Why do you have this level of ego that makes you think that whatever he says doesn't apply?
Whoa whoa whoa. It was a RV? Since when? Why are you explaining this now? You found actual scummy behavior on numberq? You mean possible a newbscum bad phrasing. Thats not very solid. Its not the game works. You switched votes super fast and he asked you why. I wanna know why too.
Now you are changing your story. You said it was a random vote. meaning there was no backing to said vote. but now you are saying he is scummy. AND that there is ahigh chancehe is scum? Really? High chance? Me thinks not. Numberq is more likely than "High chance" its like you think hes confirmed scum.
You can change your mind, but not into straight contradictions. You can change your mind without saying that you didn't do something you said you did but really didn't do.
Again with the thinking your cool. Your accusation is as flimsy as <something super flimsy here>. Unless you make a case then I don't see any reason to believe you.
↑ hiplop wrote:↑ Captain Corporal wrote:Some people's reactions to haoala's wagon are amazing.
For example, Hiplop's #94 and #96.
In #94 we admits Haoala's scumminess, but says NumberQ is scummier. This is exactly the same as the "Vote: town, FoS: scumbuddy" tactic I've seen used before. In #96 he wants everyone to jump off the wagon (even though Haoala is scummy to him), and onto his wagon.
Sounds like scum trying to get scumbuddy out of trouble.
VOTE: Haoala
I'll take Reck's place
ON PAGE FIVE MY READS ARE MOST DEFINITELY SOLID.
Not sure how you could possibly think im scum but OK you do that captain corporal. What about the 90% of town players who have more than one scumread? Why are you clearly ignoring the more common situation?
You said they were solid. You said HIGH CHANCE. You said that numberq was EVEN HIGHER. That sounds like you said your reads were pretty darn solid to me. So tell me, whats your story this time? Its seems to change every time.
Why? Why is his post townish. Why is haoala's vote not townish? Reasons. Explanations for reasons. Case. Vote. Simple as that.
↑ hiplop wrote:↑ xRECKONERx wrote:ALL THE WAGONS ARE GOOD WAGONS.
Vote: haoala
AJ is still scum, though we can take care of his buddy first.
idk theres an idiotic wagon on me
Nice defense. "idiotic wagon on me". Good job. This totally makes me think you aren't scum. [/sarcasm]
This is totally useless. Fluff that does nothing. Explains nothing. Defends against nothing. Accuses nothing. Nothing.
Summary: hiplop has changed his vote, changed his story, not explained anything. Been uncooperative. This is not an "idiotic wagon".
Hiplop: Make a defense. Don't say its and idiotic wagon. Don't be stubborn and say "no thank you". Stop trying to act cool. And do something useful.
VOTE: Hiplop
Robo out for now.
That was exactly my case on hiplop. i dont understand why you find it so hard to understand simple stuff.
I
Hiraki wrote
was nowhere on your scumlist. I make one random vote, and you vote me.
What does that tell me?
You have no clue who the scum actually is, and are just being opportunistic to the max.
and i voted for you where?
Hiraki wrote
haoala (5) - DemonHybrid, numberQ, hiplop, xRECKONERx, Oversoul
hiplop (5) - RedPanda, Captain Corporal, Chronopie, Robocopter87, haoala
No one voted before you did, so that's a complete lie. GG.
haoala (5) - DemonHybrid, numberQ, hiplop, xRECKONERx, Oversoul
hiplop (5) - RedPanda, Captain Corporal, Chronopie, Robocopter87, haoala
alabaskaJ wrotepost 223
right now i feel comfortable sayingvote: hiplopas it seems pretty evident to me (and xRECKONERx, ironically enough) voting outside of hiplop and haola will just stall our day (although i am going to review Red Panda). one last closing thought:
So your post is a lie?
You have manipulated something. You have no case apart from some bullshit. No concrete no force.Hiraki wrote
And here's this fluff that RP puts in Oversoul's case.
That little push that I must've manipulated something, because I must be wrong.
no me gusta.
Hiraki wrote
No clue! It's not like we all know that they're both town!
Oh wait.
We do.
No wait no wait. You couldn't explain could you so you have to resort to bullshit again. If i was scum And if i knew Hiplop and haoala were town beforehand what was the neccesity for me to switch votes at the last minute and paint a target on my back?
Robo wrote
The thing is, anybody after me who voted Hiraki after I did isn't confirmed. I know it sounds selfcentered or something but I since I was the first, mine was the first legit reaction to it.
RedPanda could have just been copying me. As could the people after that.
Fair enough.
Hiraki wrote
Funny how RedPanda skips some points.
This is policy now.
What points? ive answered every single thing.Stop tunneling on me with bad facts. it makes you look foolish.
Nice way to put your foot in both doors for lynch candidates as well. So townie.
