Open 343: True Love - Game Over!

[Andr├®]

First things first: Maxous is my lover. For reference here are all of the lovers pairs:

André and Maxous
Uncledaphne and Chaotic
pinkfloyd and robotnik

We are lynching him.

I don't like this at all. What are your reasons? You're seemingly nonchalant attitude in a potential lylo is worrying and highly suspicious for that. Your play D1 was a post-just-to-post attitude. You only posted 1 meaningful post (Post #68; I'll quote it next):

Vote:Isa

Im sorry about Auction Mafia it was a big mistake on my part but I couldnt stand Mego any longer. Also, your pushing too hard on the policy lynch. Self voting is a big no-no

At that point, Isa was not pushing a policy lynch. And I don't quite see how her self-vote warranted a vote of your own. True, it was definitely not a good move, but it seems to me like you were jumping on easy prey. VOTE: uncledaphne

In this post how did you know I was Chaotic's partner?

Chaotic said it himself:

Oh and if Chaotic Neutrality and uncledaphne are lovers I want them lynched next.

We are. And I'm on board with lynching my lover.

[Andr├®]

EBWOP:

I really have nothing else to say. Robotnick is very obviously scum.

You have not explained why yet.

[pinkfloyd]

Firstly, you wanted me to trust you more? Why?
Secondly, I get called a noob a lot. Not sure why. It tends to just go over my head, except when people make a big deal out of it, at which point I regard it as a scumtell and react to it in the same way that I would any other scumtells.

So you would open up your reads to see if you are actually scum?

[Robotnick2]

And yet you lied about your own reads.
In this game, pinkfloyd, one must trust no-one. Until it can be unequivocally proven that a given person is town, which in this setup is impossible, then one cannot and should not trust them. Therefore, seeing as giving reads is standard practice, it stands to reason that one does not have to trust someone to tell them their reads. Thus, your expectation of me to "open up my reads" if I were to trust you is a logical fallacy. Furthermore, it also stands to reason that your

expectation

of me to trust you is a scumtell, because I have absolutely no reason to, unless I were to

know

whether you were town or scum. The only people in this game who know town from scum are the scum themselves. Thus, your arguement is invalid; if I were scum, I would not need to trust you, and if I were town, I could not trust you. Furthermore, I would posit that you are scum, using scum reasoning as to why I should trust you.

Fixed tag
~mod

[pinkfloyd]

Well robo, I like your case and I will not argue against it, because I want us to die together

DEAL WITH IT.

[izakthegoomba]

Official Votecount 2.05 (unchanged)


Robotnick2 (1) - uncledaphne
uncledaphne (1) - André
André (1) - pinkfloyd
pinkfloyd (1) - Robotnick2
Chaotic Neutrality (0) -

none

Maxous (0) -

none

No Lynch (0) -

none

Not voting (2) - Chaotic Neutrality, Maxous


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch, 3 to no lynch.

The deadline is 00:00 UTC on 20th October 2011.

[Maxous]

Done.

Robotnick seems town to me. His question did not look like a gambit to me and his responses afterwards seemed like town frustration at getting picked at for something trivial.

Uncle Daphne - slight scum. Did not like his vote to put Isa at L-1, citing reasons of self-voting and pushing a PL too hard.
The contast in tone between this and this is strange.

Pink floyd - slight scum. This vote is a red flag to me particulary considering his 'noob town' claims towards Robotnick.
I would read him as scummier if he did'nt have a comment of 'good gambit is good' which is nagging at me :/

CN and Andre are null.

[Andr├®]

Mod

: It may be time to consider prodding chaotic now.

[Chaotic Neutrality]

I'm reading along, I just don't have much to say at the moment.

[Maxous]

This is getting nowhere

VOTE: UncleDaphne

if i'm wrong, so be it

[izakthegoomba]

Official Votecount 2.06

!L-2!

uncledaphne (2) - André, Maxous
Robotnick2 (1) - uncledaphne
André (1) - pinkfloyd
pinkfloyd (1) - Robotnick2
Chaotic Neutrality (0) -

none

Maxous (0) -

none

No Lynch (0) -

none

Not voting (1) - Chaotic Neutrality


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch, 3 to no lynch.

The deadline is 00:00 UTC on 20th October 2011.

[Maxous]

Oh.
I just realised it is impossible for scum to quickhammer.
Carry on.

[Andr├®]

This is getting nowhere

VOTE: UncleDaphne

if i'm wrong, so be it

Any reasoning or just a pressure vote?

[pinkfloyd]

Can we please not hammer the last T/T team

[izakthegoomba]

Official Votecount 2.07 (unchanged)

!L-2!

uncledaphne (2) - André, Maxous
Robotnick2 (1) - uncledaphne
André (1) - pinkfloyd
pinkfloyd (1) - Robotnick2
Chaotic Neutrality (0) -

none

Maxous (0) -

none

No Lynch (0) -

none

Not voting (1) - Chaotic Neutrality


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch, 3 to no lynch.

The deadline is 00:00 UTC on 20th October 2011.

[Robotnick2]

Again, this is getting nowhere. As uncledaphne is my other scum candidate;
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Uncledaphne

That puts him at L-1 folks! Anyone wanna hammer and prove me wrong?

[Andr├®]

Can we please not hammer the last T/T team

Why are you so sure of uncle and chaotic being T/T? You still have not supplied reasons for this, nor have you supplied reasons for why you think robo and I are scum. If we lynch uncle and he flips scum, I'm going to gun for you.

[pinkfloyd]

Because Andre and robo are scum, meaning uncle and chaotic are town

[izakthegoomba]

Official Votecount 2.08

!L-1!

uncledaphne (3) - André, Maxous, Robotnick2
Robotnick2 (1) - uncledaphne
André (1) - pinkfloyd
pinkfloyd (0) -

none

Chaotic Neutrality (0) -

none

Maxous (0) -

none

No Lynch (0) -

none

Not voting (1) - Chaotic Neutrality


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch, 3 to no lynch.

The deadline is 00:00 UTC on 20th October 2011.

[Maxous]

Hmm okay.
So, what we know is Pink floyd cannot be scum with either myself or Andre.
In short, if Uncle Daphne and Chaotic are both town, robotnick

must

be scum.

@Pink Floyd: Can you explain what you find scummy about Andre?

@Andre: My vote was not a pressure vote. It was a vote to terminate =)
Basically UD's reason for putting Isa at L-1 looked opportunistic and the contrast in the post tone between his reaction to the quick hammer and voting Robotnick straight after is quite weird to me (read: weird=fake)

[Andr├®]

Because Andre and robo are scum, meaning uncle and chaotic are town

I'm going to quote myself one more time:

You still have not supplied reasons for this....

@Chaotic: What are your thoughts on uncle? You are the only person who can hammer, as PF is obviously not going to.

[Mist7676]

Official Votecount 2.09

!L-1!

uncledaphne (3) - André, Maxous, Robotnick2
Robotnick2 (1) - uncledaphne
André (1) - pinkfloyd
pinkfloyd (0) -

none

Chaotic Neutrality (0) -

none

Maxous (0) -

none

No Lynch (0) -

none

Not voting (1) - Chaotic Neutrality


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch, 3 to no lynch.

The deadline is 00:00 UTC on 20th October 2011.

NO CHANGE

[Chaotic Neutrality]

@Chaotic: What are your thoughts on uncle? You are the only person who can hammer, as PF is obviously not going to.

It's not as if he has much to look over, but from what I can tell he's very paranoid, distant, and defensive. I'd be more than happy to hammer.

VOTE: uncledaphne

Andre + Max is probably our town other pair.

[uncledaphne]

I am disappoint. Lynch Andre please

[pinkfloyd]

We loose now that they are the T/T pair....