Mini 1262 - Game Over (Over!)
Forum rules
- SodaSpirit17
-
SodaSpirit17 Mafia Scum
- SodaSpirit17
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: June 24, 2011
- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
- Pine
-
Pine In Your Head
- Pine
- In Your Head
- In Your Head
- Posts: 16763
- Joined: February 27, 2011
- Location: Upstate New York
- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
PLEASE FORGIVE ME O GREAT ONES
I asked the wrong question. Here it is for reals, answer it and you'll probably never hear about it again:
How would you describe my usual scum play? Good, bad, flipfloppy, etc? How good/bad would be uncharacteristicslly good/bad?To be clear: my avatar was drawn by SaveTheDragons.- Mattman
-
Mattman
- Force of Nature
-
Force of Nature Goon
- Force of Nature
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 544
- Joined: September 18, 2011
- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
- Mattman
-
Mattman Townie
- Mattman
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 66
- Joined: September 13, 2011
- Force of Nature
-
Force of Nature Goon
- Force of Nature
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 544
- Joined: September 18, 2011
Yeah you seem sane. I just think calling a vote for pressure a "pressure vote" kind of defeats the purpose.
Also what prompted the Triangle = GF comment?
SK I don't think I ever answered your question.
I'm not sure I'll even remember what it was if I go back and look, unfortunately.
But yeah, being told by somebody I respect that I'm wrong does bias me toward seeing things their way.
Somewhere along the way I also looked at your meta. Except I didn't. What?
People asking about why you're reading them as town are also usually town, though scummeta may cover that now.- Force of Nature
-
Force of Nature Goon
- Force of Nature
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 544
- Joined: September 18, 2011
- triangle123
-
triangle123 Goon
- triangle123
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 784
- Joined: August 27, 2011
- Yates
-
Yates Jack of All Trades
- Yates
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5119
- Joined: October 12, 2011
- Location: In your closet. In your head.
Wow, Triangle. You are pushing pretty hard for no reason and with no evidence. Wait - I put a hyphen in my post. Oh! And an ellipses... Those are surely scum tells. Now I see your rationale.
You'll notice that I didn't have a vote on the board [other than no lynch] expressly because I didn't feel as though there was any evidence to substantiate a vote. I'm not even bothered by people calling me scum or potential scum or scummy or whatever they want. That's how a discovery phase works. While I acknowledge that I'm not a fan of the sarcasm or tone of FoN or Sleepy's posts, I at least understand what they are trying to do. In fact, I believe that their pressure may have borne fruit in exposing YOU.
Vote: Triangle
Suspicious to me at present:
1. Triangle - Looks like you are trying to exploit a general distrust of Yates as seemingly the 2nd or 3rd option for players [190, 215, 224+225, 229+230, 237]. Plus, voting for a noob is the easy way out. No one is going to defend someone they don't know or particularly care for/about.
2. kondi2424 - random lynch vote with no explanation in 252
Less than suspicious to me at present:
1. Grimmjow - I agree with pretty much everything he says in post 253. A reluctance to random vote on Day 1 is not an immediate indicator of scum. To the contrary, it seems to indicate a reluctance to vote poorly. This is a position I at least understand. As indicated above, I also agree with his assessment of kondi. I can't even blame him for not liking my initial posts. I haven't had anything of substance to say until this post.
2. Implosion - Handled my "noob post" well in 176.
3. Sleepy - Handled my "cattle prod" well in 190.
Iffy:
Right now I'm iffy on Pine. Posts 195, 197 and 199, for example, show irrational flip-flopping. While that isn't an immediate incrimination because I did bait him a bit, it gives me cause for concern. At the very least, it gives me reason to pay a little extra attention to his posts and behavior.Coming soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in- Pine
-
Pine In Your Head
- Pine
- In Your Head
- In Your Head
- Posts: 16763
- Joined: February 27, 2011
- Location: Upstate New York
- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
- xRECKONERx
-
xRECKONERx GD is my Best Man
- xRECKONERx
- GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- Posts: 26087
- Joined: March 15, 2009
↑ Yates wrote:Wow, Triangle. You are pushing pretty hard for no reason and with no evidence. Wait - I put a hyphen in my post. Oh! And an ellipses... Those are surely scum tells. Now I see your rationale.
You'll notice that I didn't have a vote on the board [other than no lynch] expressly because I didn't feel as though there was any evidence to substantiate a vote. I'm not even bothered by people calling me scum or potential scum or scummy or whatever they want. That's how a discovery phase works. While I acknowledge that I'm not a fan of the sarcasm or tone of FoN or Sleepy's posts, I at least understand what they are trying to do. In fact, I believe that their pressure may have borne fruit in exposing YOU.
Vote: Triangle
Suspicious to me at present:
1. Triangle - Looks like you are trying to exploit a general distrust of Yates as seemingly the 2nd or 3rd option for players [190, 215, 224+225, 229+230, 237]. Plus, voting for a noob is the easy way out. No one is going to defend someone they don't know or particularly care for/about.
2. kondi2424 - random lynch vote with no explanation in 252
Less than suspicious to me at present:
1. Grimmjow - I agree with pretty much everything he says in post 253. A reluctance to random vote on Day 1 is not an immediate indicator of scum. To the contrary, it seems to indicate a reluctance to vote poorly. This is a position I at least understand. As indicated above, I also agree with his assessment of kondi. I can't even blame him for not liking my initial posts. I haven't had anything of substance to say until this post.
2. Implosion - Handled my "noob post" well in 176.
3. Sleepy - Handled my "cattle prod" well in 190.
Iffy:
Right now I'm iffy on Pine. Posts 195, 197 and 199, for example, show irrational flip-flopping. While that isn't an immediate incrimination because I did bait him a bit, it gives me cause for concern. At the very least, it gives me reason to pay a little extra attention to his posts and behavior.
is there a reason you didn't say a damn word about megreen shirt thursdays- Yates
-
Yates Jack of All Trades
- Yates
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5119
- Joined: October 12, 2011
- Location: In your closet. In your head.
- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
- Grimmjow
-
Grimmjow Goon
- Grimmjow
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 902
- Joined: April 5, 2011
- Location: Durham, NC
- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
- Yates
-
Yates Jack of All Trades
- Yates
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5119
- Joined: October 12, 2011
- Location: In your closet. In your head.
↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Do you have any actual townreads?
There's no one I have identified as "absolutely positively" townie. I think that will require investigation information or confirmed scum hunting success. My "less than suspicious" list would be the people I would investigate later [after checking on more suspicious characters] if I had a cop/investigator role.
A good half of the "town" has yet to contribute anything substantive at this early juncture in the game.Coming soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in- SleepyKrew
-
SleepyKrew he/himSnark Attack
- SleepyKrew
he/him- Snark Attack
- Snark Attack
- Posts: 15483
- Joined: April 27, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: the henhouse
- xRECKONERx
-
xRECKONERx GD is my Best Man
- xRECKONERx
- GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- Posts: 26087
- Joined: March 15, 2009
↑ Yates wrote:↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Do you have any actual townreads?
There's no one I have identified as "absolutely positively" townie. I think that will require investigation information or confirmed scum hunting success. My "less than suspicious" list would be the people I would investigate later [after checking on more suspicious characters] if I had a cop/investigator role.
A good half of the "town" has yet to contribute anything substantive at this early juncture in the game.
you do realize town makes up a majority of the game so saying you have varying degrees of scumreads but no townreads is a terrible way of doing this
However Yates is probably town for post 296 alonegreen shirt thursdaysCopyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- xRECKONERx
- SleepyKrew
- Yates
- SleepyKrew
- Grimmjow
- SleepyKrew
- Yates
- xRECKONERx
- SleepyKrew
- SleepyKrew
- Pine
- Yates
- triangle123
- Force of Nature
- Force of Nature
- Mattman
- SleepyKrew
- Force of Nature
- SleepyKrew
- SleepyKrew
- Pine
- SleepyKrew
- SodaSpirit17