Cyclic Experimentation Set x02 - [Game Over]


Forum rules
User avatar
Magister Ludi
Magister Ludi
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Magister Ludi
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3258
Joined: April 7, 2011
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #75 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:32 am

Post by Magister Ludi »

I like this StringerBell guy!

Yeah, warriormode's initial post was very worthy of a vote. I would say that crypto sprinting away from a warrior vote looks suspicious if warrior ever flips scum. (Its also possible crypto is trying to go with the idea that a lot of posts equal town, and is just posting high volumes to this end.)
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #76 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:34 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

crypto wrote:i think magnaofillusion knows better than to vote me


Yeah, you probably need to re-adjust your perceptions. You've presented what at this early stage is the scummiest post I have seen so far. Thus you get a vote. Pretty simple process.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
Magister Ludi
Magister Ludi
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Magister Ludi
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3258
Joined: April 7, 2011
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #77 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:34 am

Post by Magister Ludi »

Crypto, why would you want me to explain why someone should be voted, if you agree that they should be voted?
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #78 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:37 am

Post by crypto »

okay, okay, magister ludi, you've cowed me into busing my scum mate. it's only page 3, so i'm confident enough that by the end of day one he'll have wormed his way out of getting lynched like all early-game obvious scum do, thanks to his own recovery as well as to the town's wondrous ability to overlook plain scummy behavior and instead obsess over ridiculous conspiracy theories.

unvote
vote: warriormode


what i have on magna is very thin, so this satisfies me.

preview edit:
magister ludi wrote:Crypto, why would you want me to explain why someone should be voted, if you agree that they should be voted?
i want to get a feel for your thought process. that's a cornerstone of effective scumhunting.

magna wrote:You've presented what at this early stage is the scummiest post I have seen so far.
enlighten me.
User avatar
Toogeloo
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8400
Joined: October 21, 2009
Location: Jusenkyo

Post Post #79 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:37 am

Post by Toogeloo »

MagnaofIllusion wrote:Indulge me here Toog - the only times I recall you getting significant pressure and getting lynched Day 1 you were scum. Do you have any Town games where that happened?

DEFCON 2 Me v. Scum Fate, Fate won that battle.

Here is a list of every game that I have been called scum in and lynched (or endgamed) at some point, though I was town:
Earth's Struggle
DEFCON 2
Reck's World of Warcraft
Bloodbath in Camden


I play most my games offsite though, so a good majority of my meta is found elsewhere. Not entirely sure why you care about this though, you know my meta, you've played with me enough.

MagnaofIllusion wrote:I'd like you to specifically state whether you object to the claim passing or actively try to undermine it (by not being forthcoming or truthful) to make things "more interesting" as you put it.
I haven't yet determined if I find the system advantageous to town or not.
User avatar
Toogeloo
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8400
Joined: October 21, 2009
Location: Jusenkyo

Post Post #80 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:48 am

Post by Toogeloo »

PeregrineV wrote:I like the RVS or RQS or whatever stage. It's about the only post in the whole game where you have fun for fun's sake. After that, it's about winning.

There is usually nothing random about the RVS/RQS. The game is always about winning.
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #81 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:53 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

Stringer wrote:I'm not an expert on crypto's play, I've never played with him before, but it certainly seems to me that a), b), and c)
were all part of RVS, and therefore not really to be taken seriously.
In d), he jumped on the warriormode "wagon", which consisted of Magistar Ludi and nobody else, because warrior's reasoning was nonexistent.


The bolded I read as similar to Junpei’s assertion that RVS is useless. I disagree in that RVS votes are part of the game and often can be used to find relational tells.

--

cypto wrote:enlighten me.


I already did. Did you not read my post where I voted for you? You position that the plan is stupid and implosion should be quicklynched for mentioning it (regardless whether it was RVS or teehee reaction testing or whatever you want to call it) was the closest thing to scummy play at that point.

Your recent play calling out others for not providing reasons while you engage in the exact same behavior has so far provided me with sufficent reason not to move it.

--

Toogeloo wrote:DEFCON 2 Me v. Scum Fate, Fate won that battle.

Here is a list of every game that I have been called scum in and lynched (or endgamed) at some point, though I was town:


Being lynched outside of Day 1 as Town isn’t really relevant. It pretty much happens to every Town player who plays Mafia.

Saying your playstyle generates scum-reads as you did is Anti-Town. If you are Town you’ve only given scum an open invitation to attack you by self-admitting you are naturally ‘scummy’. If you are scum it’s a pre-emptive measure to say “I’m not scummy, it’s my playstyle” which is a complete cop-out. Neither serves Town’s interests.

Toogeloo wrote:I haven't yet determined if I find the system advantageous to town or not.


Did you read Cyclical X01? Because regardless of how the Mod has crafted the set-up to reduce the effectiveness clearly the plan does not give scum any additional information and helps Town via PoE and helping to establish reads based on the claimed pass targets. I’m not quite sure what else you might have to say on the issue.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #82 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:54 am

Post by crypto »

toogeloo wrote:blah

i wish you would vote

or state some reads

or something
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #83 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:54 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

Magister Ludi wrote:Yeah, warriormode's initial post was very worthy of a vote. I would say that crypto sprinting away from a warrior vote looks suspicious if warrior ever flips scum. (Its also possible crypto is trying to go with the idea that a lot of posts equal town, and is just posting high volumes to this end.)


Please elaborate on why his initial post was vote-worthy.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #84 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:56 am

Post by crypto »

magna wrote:I already did. Did you not read my post where I voted for you? You position that the plan is stupid and implosion should be quicklynched for mentioning it (regardless whether it was RVS or teehee reaction testing or whatever you want to call it) was the closest thing to scummy play at that point.
where did i give that reason for my quick lynch suggestion? do you think my quick lynch suggestion was serious? have you ever come across the word
facetious
before? do you know what the opposite of serious is? do you think that experienced mafiosi would attempt blatantly anti-town play?

magna wrote:Your recent play calling out others for not providing reasons while you engage in the exact same behavior has so far provided me with sufficent reason not to move it.
that's a blatant misconstruction. i've done no "calling out." i ask questions to strengthen my understanding of other players' thought processes. that's how i get reads. you're misattributing a critical or threatening quality to my probing when you.
User avatar
Toogeloo
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8400
Joined: October 21, 2009
Location: Jusenkyo

Post Post #85 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:00 am

Post by Toogeloo »

MagnaofIllusion wrote:Saying your playstyle generates scum-reads as you did is Anti-Town. If you are Town you've only given scum an open invitation to attack you by self-admitting you are naturally "scummy". If you are scum it's a pre-emptive measure to say "I'm not scummy, it%u2019s my playstyle%u201D which is a complete cop-out. Neither serves Town%u2019s interests.
I was giving my personality traits as asked. Take it however you want.
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #86 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:01 am

Post by crypto »

crypto wrote:
magna wrote:I already did. Did you not read my post where I voted for you? You position that the plan is stupid and implosion should be quicklynched for mentioning it (regardless whether it was RVS or teehee reaction testing or whatever you want to call it) was the closest thing to scummy play at that point.
where did i give that reason for my quick lynch suggestion? do you think my quick lynch suggestion was serious? have you ever come across the word
facetious
before? do you know what the opposite of serious is? do you think that experienced mafiosi would attempt blatantly anti-town play?
i expect real answers to all of those questions, by the way. i'm not one for joking around.
User avatar
Toogeloo
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8400
Joined: October 21, 2009
Location: Jusenkyo

Post Post #87 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:01 am

Post by Toogeloo »

crypto wrote:
toogeloo wrote:blah

i wish you would vote

or state some reads

or something

I'll get on this eventually.
User avatar
Toogeloo
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8400
Joined: October 21, 2009
Location: Jusenkyo

Post Post #88 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:04 am

Post by Toogeloo »

Would you count Mass Effect Mafia, MoI? You thought I was scum Day 1 there, I lived through the Day and you tried to swap me with you you hoping I would eat the bullet... which ended quite humorously if I recall correctly.
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #89 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:11 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

Cypto wrote:where did i give that reason for my quick lynch suggestion? do you think my quick lynch suggestion was serious? have you ever come across the word facetious before? do you know what the opposite of serious is?
do you think that experienced mafiosi would attempt blatantly anti-town play?


Of course I understand what being facetious is. I’m not some 12 year old you can make cower with rapid posting and empty questions like these.

The bolded is telling. Of course they would if they thought they could get away with it. Players like Fate and Sociopath specialize in it. Appealing to the WIFOM this early on seems like a pretty over-the-top reaction to what is minimal pressure at this stage.

Crypto wrote:that's a blatant misconstruction. i've done no "calling out." i ask questions to strengthen my understanding of other players' thought processes. that's how i get reads. you're misattributing a critical or threatening quality to my probing when you.


Asking people to justify their votes is ‘callling out’ as I put it. And you have clearly done that. Examples –

ISO 7 wrote: is this vote reasoned or random


ISO10 wrote: so you've established that i move quickly and unpredictably.
why are you voting me?
do you actually think i am mafia or is this a policy-type vote? if you think i am mafia, then what do you think is the secret scum agenda driving my play?


You are welcome to get reads however you wish. If that process I find scummy I’ll vote / inquire of you. That’s how Mafia works. In this case you ask others to provide reasoning but yourself don't. That's low level Cognitive Dissonance.

Let me ask you – looking back at ISO 7 you specifically ask Warriormode if his vote was ramdom or serious and then three posts later vote him agreeing that it was scummy before he even responded. Why question him if you’ve already drawn the conclusion within minutes?

--

Toogeloo wrote:Would you count Mass Effect Mafia, MoI? You thought I was scum Day 1 there, I lived through the Day and you tried to swap me with you you hoping I would eat the bullet... which ended quite humorously if I recall correctly.


Given I didn’t play in Mass Effect Mafia I’m not sure what you are getting at here. Please explain.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
Toogeloo
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8400
Joined: October 21, 2009
Location: Jusenkyo

Post Post #90 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:13 am

Post by Toogeloo »

MagnaofIllusion wrote:Given I didn%u2019t play in Mass Effect Mafia I%u2019m not sure what you are getting at here. Please explain.

"whoops" ... had you confused with someone else lol.
User avatar
Toogeloo
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Toogeloo
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8400
Joined: October 21, 2009
Location: Jusenkyo

Post Post #91 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:16 am

Post by Toogeloo »

Mass Effect Mafia.... Spyrex thought I was scum Day 1, and he was Jack with a Bus, Vig shot, and some other junk. My first post I stated I wanted the Governror lynched because I didn't want scum to have the role, I got a lot of flak for it. Spyrex made the case that I was scum, but someone else was lynched. That night, Spyrex bussed me and him, thinking that he was going to get shot and was hoping I would take the bullet. Instead, I got shot, and Spyrex ate the bullet.
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #92 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:24 am

Post by crypto »

magna wrote:Let me ask you – looking back at ISO 7 you specifically ask Warriormode if his vote was ramdom or serious and then three posts later vote him agreeing that it was scummy before he even responded. Why question him if you’ve already drawn the conclusion within minutes?
his vote was scummy. it was understandable. i found the real substance of his post intuitively scummy.

magna wrote:You are welcome to get reads however you wish. If that process I find scummy I’ll vote / inquire of you.
"i don't lynch people for behavior that is actually scummy. i lynch people whose peculiar scumhunting methods i find instinctively suspicious, probably because they feel foreign to me. embrace your irrationality, fellas. that's what i do. and i get by!" – magnaofillusion, paraphrased
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #93 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:25 am

Post by crypto »

at least you have the decency to use the spaced en dash rather than the stuffy antiquated em.
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #94 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:28 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

Crypto wrote:his vote was scummy. it was understandable. i found the real substance of his post intuitively scummy.


Why question him then?

And why was it scummy? Elaborate.

Crypto wrote:"i don't lynch people for behavior that is actually scummy. i lynch people whose peculiar scumhunting methods i find instinctively suspicious, probably because they feel foreign to me. embrace your irrationality, fellas. that's what i do. and i get by!" – magnaofillusion, paraphrased


More empty rhetoric. Thanks, I’m getting a good idea at your playstyle already and it will help me develop a solid read on you as the game progresses.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #95 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:32 am

Post by crypto »

magna wrote:Why question him then?
again, understanding people's thought processes is fundamental to my scumhunting – and everyone else's, i hope.

magna wrote:And why was it scummy? Elaborate.
i said it was intuitively scummy. that indicates that i don't have strong logical reasons. but i found his post rushed and uncurious (bordering on bored) and too minimalist.

magna wrote:Thanks, I’m getting a good idea at your playstyle already and it will help me develop a solid read on you as the game progresses.
you're welcome, magnaofillusion. you're so welcome.
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #96 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:33 am

Post by crypto »

i should add that that mock quote was intended to be a genuine criticism of your approach
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #97 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:41 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

crypto wrote:i said it was intuitively scummy. that indicates that i don't have strong logical reasons. but i found his post rushed and uncurious (bordering on bored) and too minimalist.


If you can explain how you think any of these attributes (rushed, uncurious, too minimalist) actually applies or how they are scummy please do so. If the answer is "Gut / Intuitive" don't worry about responding.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
User avatar
crypto
crypto
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
crypto
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4088
Joined: April 20, 2009

Post Post #98 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:48 am

Post by crypto »

i'd like to think he would be more curious/eager/zealous at the start of the game and looking around for things to do, embers to stir, etc. i know that when i'm town i'm always amped up at the start of a game. the rushed, over-minimalist appearance is a manifestation of that lack of curiosity. obviously, early-game excitement varies from player to player so it's not a terribly strong lead.
User avatar
Kdub
Kdub
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Kdub
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4220
Joined: March 3, 2009

Post Post #99 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:00 am

Post by Kdub »

MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Official Passing Strategy


The Cyclic Claim process is a two step process.

Step 1 - The Day after you cycle a power at Night in your first post of the day you claim to have passed a power. You do NOT claim the Power or who you passed it to.

Step 2 - The second Day after you cycle a power at Night in your first post of the day you claim who you passed the power in Step 1 to. In the case of possessing multiple powers you claim every person you passed the to. You do NOT claim what the power was.

Having not played in the first game, is this strategy supposed to be some balance between being able to figure out the setup and not giving the scum too much information? I don't see any fundamental problem with it, I just don't understand the reasoning behind the details of what and when things get revealed. Also, how is it supposed to deal with limited-shot powers that can disappear, or what happens when somebody's power gets revealed earlier? If I'm undermining the strategy by asking, feel free to say so and I'll drop it.
Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic Mafia - 17-player large theme, currently needs (0) replacements
Locked