Implosion: if the doc can protect against poison, when should the doc claim it does/does not?
Once someone has had the doctor and it's been a few days since they had it, they could say so. Or if we ever massclaim what abilities exist in the game.
Implosion: if the doc can protect against poison, when should the doc claim it does/does not?
MoI 315 wrote:Nice deflection.
You basically chose to comment on Stringer and said effectively “He’s sort of scummy but I’m not sure if he should be voted”. You’ve just laid the groundwork to go either way on him depending on the wagon and to have an out if he ever flips.
Town doesn’t have reason to lay ‘escape hatches’ like that.
MoI 315 wrote:I don’t see that at all.
MoI 315 wrote:On one hand you present EpicMafia as the scourage of Mafia existence and then turn around and use a phrase that germinated and became well know from there.
MoI 315 wrote:Also I disagree that asking EC to support his reasoning when it was highly suspect (as I pointed out myself) is ‘Why Me’ posting.
spring 317 wrote:@Redcoyote, what is the point of your last post exactly?
ML 323 wrote:Just to reiterate. I think there is an almost zero percent chance that Fourseen is actually going to flip scum.
spring 326 wrote:I don't like the way you are implying that I'm stupid because I'm finding fault in you whereas no one else has. That's a very scummy reply because it is 1)trying to discredit your attacker 2)a fallacy because you are basically saying "you can't find fault with me because no one has yet".
This is doubly scummy because you have played with me in an ongoing game, and you therefore know that I'm not a particularly bad scumhunter.
ML 343 wrote:Did this lead you anywhere?
DGB 357 wrote:You're better than this word macaroni salad when you're town.
Junpei 365 wrote:Okay... so DrippingGoofball has no actual reads, and is instead just putting up a list to give the appearance of scumhunting, got it.
FC 376 wrote:@Game so If no one thinks I am scum, then why am I still the leading wagon...
ML 378 wrote:I think crypto replacing out in the way he did is actually a large town tell.
nopoint 380 wrote:Oblivious???
4see: Help! Wagon on me
Ludi: Oblivious???
nopoint 380 wrote:I don't get why ppl discourage the leading pressure wagon butnot pushing for any other wagon (Magister Ludi, slysly )
wazza 381 wrote:... seriously actually place a case so that people will believe you i will say this once
to start a legitimate wagon place a convincing case that gets others to look at what they have done.
but no you have just said he is scum... sorry but i don't believe it.
Ghostlin 391 wrote:To be fair, there are two interpretations of this post and both of them are correct depending on your viewing stragedy.
1) Oops. I made a mistake here. This player is protown and my reasoning was horribad to begin with.
2) Damn! People are riding me, must unvote.
I'm leaning towards #2 in the above situtation.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:
WE5874016 - Sinestro [Online.] – Why Town? Much lower activity than should be expected from hydra of hiplop and Andy. Horrible justification for Fourseen vote. Given the mechanics of this game hiplop’s ‘I’m bored because I’m VT’ regular excuse doesn’t hold water.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:
BT1357719 - Stringer Bell [Online.] – Why not Scum? Do you disagree with my reasoning?
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:DGB wrote:You're better than this word macaroni salad when you're town.
VOTE: nopointunactingup
Please elaborate on why the phrase ‘word maracroni salad’ appears in that sentence.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:DGB wrote:You won't have to campaign for my lynch tomorrow, your team will NK me.
If you are Town ( or scum in Multi-scum environment ) you know this isn’t true. It’s why you go to the trouble of playing as you do Day 1.
↑ PeregrineV wrote:↑ DrippingGoofball wrote:LEGITIMATE SIMULATIONS
HOSTILE SCRIPTS
IW8573414 - Junpei [Online.]
SN5795818 - Kdub [Online.]
JW2804010 - nopointinactingup [Online.]
I'd like elaboration on these three reads, please.
↑ Bunnylover wrote:I am still in favor of Crypto been lynched, but I think FourseenCircumstance is a much more obvious choice.
↑ Bunnylover wrote:@ML: Sorry, but I disagree with you.I agree with Junpei that your taking things out of proportion.
↑ RedCoyote wrote:MoI 315 wrote:
wazza 381 wrote:... seriously actually place a case so that people will believe you i will say this once
to start a legitimate wagon place a convincing case that gets others to look at what they have done.
but no you have just said he is scum... sorry but i don't believe it.
I don't like this defense of nopoint out of the blue.
↑ Toogeloo wrote:↑ Bunnylover wrote:I am still in favor of Crypto been lynched, but I think FourseenCircumstance is a much more obvious choice.
↑ Bunnylover wrote:@ML: Sorry, but I disagree with you.I agree with Junpei that your taking things out of proportion.
There do not seem like a town's thought process. Each of these statements reek to me.
Unvote;
Vote: Bunnylover
This sounds like Bunny is attempting to leave her options open in case momentum shifts back on to Crypto, which at the time of the post both 4seen and crypto are getting a lot of heat. There is too much justification for the vote switch, and comes off scummily.↑ Bunnylover wrote:I am still in favor of Crypto been lynched, but I think FourseenCircumstance is a much more obvious choice.
Appealing to another player's read to justify disagreement. Bunny is attempting to back up possible support against ML and possibly playing town against town. If Bunny is scum, Junpei and ML are both town.↑ Bunnylover wrote:@ML: Sorry, but I disagree with you.I agree with Junpei that your taking things out of proportion.
Fourseen is getting a lot of backing as a bad lynch, and so Bunny attempts to jump ship here and go with her previously set up attack on ML, which at the moment seems like a park vote due to it being the only vote on ML and almost no case provided by Bunny for the vote other than, "He's WKing 4seen too much."
↑ Magister Ludi wrote:You think fourseen is town and then vote me over the fact I've been calling him town? Hell, you probably got the idea he was town from me. And can you explain what you mean by saying;
a claimed "bad player"
What do you mean by this?
What are your thoughts on nopointactingup and warrior?
↑ warriormode wrote:Prod noted. Still following this game. Will be posting tomorrow morning.
↑ Magister Ludi wrote:
(I believe in last game scum had daytalk? If so, you would expect one of his buddies to at least tell him something good to say)
↑ Bunnylover wrote:
Their are about 14 people needed to achieve a lynch. With 11 people on the wagon, why would (as scum) distance myself against it as their would be less then 10% chance that people would focus on me if Fourseen flipped town?
slysly wrote:ML tells FC to check their scum daytalk for a pointer.
↑ Magister Ludi wrote:slysly wrote:ML tells FC to check their scum daytalk for a pointer.
I don't quite know what to make of this statement.For this entire day, you've been sitting on the wagon that I was leading on warriormode. Basically, you agree with me that warrior is scum, and forseen is not.And now you all of a sudden you call me out for defending forseen? And you try to fabricate something that is so banally stupid (first, assuming scum have daytalk, second scum A [me] posted in the scum quicktopic, and then felt it necessary to post in thread to point this out to my hypothetical scumbuddy)to call me scum? You make three separate illogical leaps to advance your point. This is circular scummy logic.
You've basically followed my reads all day here and then tried to take a swipe at the hand that feeds you.
And the rest of the post was equally as bad. Informing the game that it take 13 instead of 14 to lynch. Takes for the valuable input champ.
Magister Ludi wrote:Correction, slysly is not projectmatt. Shit. hmmmm