dj wrote:
1) what was not "pro-town" about my reaction?
2) why didn't you vote me when i allegedly "advocated passivity"?(you answered this briefly, but it don't make sense when added to the other info here. you claim it wasn't enough for you to determine my alignment, but when i ask you what it was about my next post that caused you to vote me, you say "it wasn't your next post." so clarify this if you can. thanks)
3) you do realize that by not waiting for those 2 players, you are in fact "advocating passivity"?(i realize that the way this is worded somewhat limits your answers, but the point being made is valid. do you disagree? if not, why not?)
4) please explain this again(referring to 132). i can't find it in your previous post. as far as i can tell, your argument is "by asking those questions, dj is sitting on the sidelines until someone does something scummy." ok. even if we accept that theory of passivity being a scumtell, you employed the exact same strategy. you posted an unexplained bandwagon vote. then... you waited on the sidelines until someone did something. then you attacked that something. coincidentally, you attacked someone for putting you at L-1. by not waiting for 2 players to react to your vote "gambit" you not only shortchanged information you could have used to better scumhunt, you shortchanged the entire town from getting more info as to the alignments of the two inactive players. great job. you arte scummy by your own logic. the only difference between you and me from a logical standpoint is that "allegedly" laid out an unexplained bandwagon vote to "bait" someone so you could attack. imo, your behavior is way more in tune with scum behavior than mine as you describe it. if you are meaning something else, or if i am misunderstanding your 132, just let me know.
5) is that a townie post to make on page 3(4 or whatever it was)?(see my previous post for reference)
6) maybe you need to learn english better?(sorry if this hurt your feelings, but i have to wonder if your inability to read and understand the nuances of my language may be hindering your ability to interpret my posts. for realz, has it occurred to you that maybe you are not communicating your thoughts precisely?)
thats 5 pretty legitimate questions i asked which you ignored. (6) is reasonable, but i admit it could come off as sarcastic. but that doesn't excuse from answering the previous 5. so whatever. if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.
, so nothing is out of ordinary, I guess)
