Jase wrote:Were there reasons based on scumhunting for these questions? I'm not seeing the purpose.
Yes. Whether you see the purpose, or not, I had reasons for them. I'll elucidate on these, this time, but don't expect it always.
The ones to 4nxi3ty were aiming to find out if the 1 of 3 comment was serious, or just a passing reference to the dominant theme of the game before voting Klazam.
The ones to you were geared around figuring out your miller claim, and around deciding if you were planning to present a certain predetermined facade forward.
The one to Timeater was a an outgrowth of what I was thinking of saying as an RVS, but by the time I posted, the game was flying strong. So, Timeater hadn't yet posted, and I was curious if his first contribution would be to focus on what was essentially a throw away question.
I'll ask questions in my own way. You may not always know why I want a particular piece of information. If I'm ever pushing for a particular lynch, I'll post my reasons unequivocally.
Zang wrote:The only thing that nachomamma8 said with his vote was him asking a question which Anxiety has already answered. Your reasoning for voting him didn't apply. So why did you vote him anyway? Did you even read Nachomamma8's and Anxiety's post?
I read 4nxi3ty's post and was taken with the smear 3, vote someone else nature of it. Nachomamma8's questions were different than mine. I wanted answers to those as well as mine. I wasn't offering Nachomamma8's questions as my reason for voting 4nxi3ty in any way. I saw that 4nxi3ty had posted answers to Nachomamma8 before I posted, but didn't have time to read them or edit the post to acknowledge that fact.
There were multiple things of interest to me when I posted, and I voted 4nxi3ty because that was most significant.
Indecision wrote:-I debate questioning Jase on his DLG vote,and also mention getting town vibes from Faraday.
-I also consider doing something erratic like voting for Jase for being a miller (maybe making a sarcastic "Everyone knows that miller claims are scummy") just to see the reactions, although we both agree that Jase looks town.
-Equinox tells me to do whatever I want to end RVS, because we can talk our way out of heat. But she also muses that a Faraday wagon is always good.
...The rest of the conversation doesn't have much to do with Faraday.
The things about Jase and me have nothing to do with Faraday, so why include them?
Since you did, though, what about Jase's vote would you have questionned?
UNVOTE: 4nxi3ty
4nxi3ty wrote:I have already said that I find klazam scummy because of his response to nacho, I would at least like to wait until he posts before moving. I don't really see a reason to rush.
His vote is evidently not subject to the persuaion of others.
@ Faraday and both heads of Indecision
Have you concluded your personal inspections of each other? Sure the debate was in thread, but it involved games and meta on each other that is unverifiable to me, at the least, and maybe most everyone else.
Am I correct that you have come to a mutual town read on each other?
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
