I'll make a more consice post summarizing my reads later.
oh, please DO. Because there isn't an ounce of anything that's scummy about ANYTHING in there except useless questions directed at me.
↑ Indecision wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake.
UNVOTE: Faraday
I don't care, I'm unvoting because I think Equinox's vote on Faraday is stupid. When he's scum, he just calls the person he's voting obvscum over again; he doesn't fly off the handle like this.
I think you're both tunneling like idiots on each other right now for abstract theory discussions you had in some chat log from some game from months ago.
Also, I refuse to claim before L-1.
~Mina
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:Anxiety wrote:With recent activity the possibility of two scum in the previously mentioned triangle is valid.
This is the problem I have with you. What recent activity? (Be more specific). Why two scum in the triangle and not SPECIFIC PEOPLE IN THE TRIANGLE? (Be more specific). Are you afraid to call people out as scum, so you just call groups of people out as scum?
[/quote]
↑ 4nxi3ty wrote:mation.
With regards to meta-talk, the triangle, and recent activity:The recent 1v1 between Indecision and Faraday is another example of what I was getting at earlier except now it looks like Jase got caught up in the middle of it and shouldn't be included in this analysis.A good amount of their accusations are centered around meta, which if they were both town and have significant meta on each other I don't see the need to focus the majority of their attention on each other. It leads me to believe that one of them has a overwhelming scumtell on the other. Right now I am leaning more toward equinox being the scum in that pairing. However, with the way faraday voted me I could also see the possibility of this being a distancing ploy.
Hinduragi wrote: I hate being scum.
↑ Klazam wrote:4nix3ty- If it looks bad, then you'll be voted for it. i dont get how its a reaction test.
I'll try to explain my unvote- This is my thought process:
1) That looks scummy, vote, and try to find out the purpose of the deal
2) Hmm, so basically the deal means nothing
3) so basically Nacho just trusts equinox that much? ------------------ At that point, it is clear the reason for my vote means nothing, so I didnt find Nacho that scummy anymore
4) I ask him if his vote on Hind had any basis (This is a different line of questioning, i dont find him scummy for the vote, just for the deal), and i unvote.
It was not a SCUMMY thing that nacho did, just a slightly scummy thing.
so, you (4nix3ty) think even after the Indecision vs Faraday drama that Indecision is scum? Could you please elaborate on this?
Pedit:
Kiwieagle- I cant see any light green, is there any? And if you're null on Indecision, why is your vote on him and not the people you think is scum?
I'm considering voting Kiwieagle, actually.
Pedit #2:
Hinduragi wrote: I hate being scum.
Why the vote on me, then?
↑ 4nxi3ty wrote:With regards to meta-talk, the triangle, and recent activity: The recent 1v1 between Indecision and Faraday is another example of what I was getting at earlier except now it looks like Jase got caught up in the middle of it and shouldn't be included in this analysis. A good amount of their accusations are centered around meta, which if they were both town and have significant meta on each other I don't see the need to focus the majority of their attention on each other. It leads me to believe that one of them has a overwhelming scumtell on the other. Right now I am leaning more toward equinox being the scum in that pairing. However, with the way faraday voted me I could also see the possibility of this being a distancing ploy.
↑ Klazam wrote:I'm thinking about voting you because your vote is on null, when somebody is more scummy in your eyes. Go and vote who you think is scummiest. And you didnt explain why you thought Nacho and Tim is scum. And how the hell do you have a town read on Oversoul? how do you get that from two posts? IF anything, I'd say Oversoul would be scummy.
And what is it with skyrim now?
Screw it. I'm gonna
vote Kiwi