↑ smargaret wrote: ↑ Isa wrote:Damn, activity.
VOTE: Smargaret
Agreeing with Lambda and voting her at the same time.
Page 1 and 2 were hilarious to read btw.
I believe the Miller claim, as I tend to do when people claim anything. Perhaps I'm a bit naive. Time will tell - I disagree that we should let the vig shoot Kanye N1 regardless of outcome of today though.
So you're agreeing with me (that we shouldn't jump to vig shot n1) and voting me at the same time?
Your vote was placed down because of...IDK, that LLD believes a claim, that we might not have a vig in the setup and that she says vigs should shoot the miller night 1 seems to be the reasons. Believing a claim is not a scumtell, assuming that we have have a vig and speculating in what should be done is not a scumtell, stating that vigs shall be shot night 1 is questionable, but I wouldn't call it a scumtell.
While doing this you still agree with LLD that yes, we shall indeed shoot the miller with the vig. By saying this, you
1. speculate in the existance of a vig, like LLD
2. believe that the miller shall be shot, like LLD. The difference is the timing.
So the only thing that LLD do that you didn't was to believe the claim, which she refuted quickly.
My reasons for voting you are the above, not the fact that I agree with you on when the miller should die. I can agree with you on different things and still vote you, because my reasons for voting you aren't related to what we agree on. It's related to your actions - i.e. putting down the vote.
In fact, if we do a list of things we agree on, it differs only slightly from the list of things that I agree with LLD on:
1. Vig speculation
2. Shooting the miller, but not necessarily at night 1
Me and LLD:
1. Vig speculation
2. Shooting the miller
3. "Believing" the claim - I'm putting this down since you did the same.
So yeah. I'm voting you not because of a huge disagreement, but rather, because of the lack of such while you still voted her.