Weeeell you did say please, and maybe I can be kind rather than cruel to you, since I don't want you to go "despondent" again
Putting someone at L-2 was something that should have generated responses; it should have made town sit back and go "hold on a minute, this is a little risky", or "wow, why is that guy putting him at L-2 so early? He hasn't even posted yet!"
Pine did this. That's why Pine gets a cookie.
You, however, ignored it completely and put down a rubbish RVS vote when there was NON RANDOM shit going down. You wanted to remain away from the actual content because it would have meant getting your hands dirty from your very first post in the game. Scum are scared of getting their hands dirty so soon. Scum don't want to call someone out who could prove a threat later. Much better to wait and see what happens and try to remain in a nice RVS bubble for as long as possible. Well, sorry buster, but I'm not letting you do that.
Then, let's follow your later responses, where you say I never even put anyone at L-2. Feigned ignorance much? I clearly put him there AS I STATED IN MY OWN POST. You can't say moving my vote off him onto you meant I never put him at L-2, since unfortunately I don't have a time machine and actions taken in the future don't retroactively modify the past. He was still at L-2 with that vote, and you STILL tried to avoid making a comment or a stand on it. That was continually scummy.
Now we find you here seeing that you CAN say something about it because Pine has called you town and because he's said something about it, and because someone else has voted you and you need an escape route to throw the limelight off you and onto someone else. So now you're being opportunistic and throwing a vote at me, in an attempt to disentangle yourself from the scumminess you've already been caught up in. You can't ignore the L-2, say it never happened, and then bold the bloody thing as if it's something you find horrendously offensive. If it was that bad, why didn't you mention this before? You're a liar, liar, and your neck will be on fire when the rope lynches you.
And then we have that I sheeped Pine's vote. Which is hilarious considering I voted you first. Again, you seem to think I have a time machine. Do you know about this thing called linear sequencing of events? If something happens first, it can't have happened in response to something that hasn't yet happened. This is pretty basic stuff.
Oh no, I have a town read for a good reason! Lock me up and throw away the key!
Also my reasons for voting you aren't cryptic. I pointed to what it was that you did that makes you scum. I love that you want me to elaborate (I obliged) but come now, seeking reasons just reeks of scum looking to defend themselves. And if I had no reason when I voted you, when I was inevitably pushed on it, why - I'd have nothing to say! I voted you clearly in response to your first post, and the reasons should have been glaringly obvious to anyone who reads it. I'm disconcerted that hardly anyone else has posted, but I'm emboldened by the fact that nintendo has voted for you.
I'm hoping after that awful post that Pine will realise he's gone off to the loony tunes, but given his #51, I'm not sure I can count him as one of the sane members of this game any longer.
Is that an elaborate enough explanation for you, VerScum?
