Hired Help Mafia - Over - Mini 1279

[Thor665]

I also bet I can show multiple times of me suggesting policy lynch as town.

Go provide links. So far, it looks like you're hoping enough dumb/lazy town players follow the MoI-suggested lynch, especially as you're pretty much sheeping him.

1. What are we betting on it? How about a sig bet - if I can provide them I get to rewrite your sig and you have to keep it for the duration you're in this game, and the same will go for me? Agree and I'll provide the links. (also known as - Thor wants something worth his time to do busy leg work for random IceGuy issue)
2. Yes, I like lazy town sheeping me.
3. I am not 'pretty much' sheeping MoI - I am drastically sheeping MoI (though I think by me providing reasoning and him not, I am at least working hard for that sheep - it's a tough life, y'know)

Unvoting when RVS ends is not a scumtell. It's not a tell at all, it's a matter of personal preference.

Yes...? You *do* note I specifically said I disagreed with the tell, so...I agree?

So I will ask again, this time rephrased: What good does my definition of policy lynching get us?

Reactions and a conversation start point for them.

@farside - wanna vote Stranger now?

[StrangerCoug]

Where the hell do you get that enomis is lurkerscum?

And there we have our opportunistic lurkerscum. This is your first post out of RVS and all you're doing is voting the prevalent wagon with a non-sequitur.

Nice dodging. Try again.

1)Why did you start the discussion then?

I interpreted Thor665 as starting it; where is it clear that that was not what he was talking about before I inquired?

2)why did you vote after you unvote after the RVS stage if you do not have any idea who to vote?

Thor665 had not made the comment about taking the policy lynch of whispersilk seriously.

@SC: Why did you switch to IceGuy?

IceGuy falsely accused enomis of lurking. That's a pretty strong accusation to be making on page 2.

What is your thoughts on Thor's comments?

They're one big ball of confusion. It is very unclear to me what he thinks. Being humorous is not a tell but understanding humor has never been my strong suit.

[StrangerCoug]

EBWOP:

1)Why did you start the discussion then?

I interpreted Thor665 as starting it; where is it clear that that was not what he was talking about before I inquired?

2)why did you vote after you unvote after the RVS stage if you do not have any idea who to vote?

Thor665 had not made the comment about taking the policy lynch of whispersilk seriously.

@SC: Why did you switch to IceGuy?

IceGuy falsely accused enomis of lurking. That's a pretty strong accusation to be making on page 2.

What is your thoughts on Thor's comments?

They're one big ball of confusion. It is very unclear to me what he thinks. Being humorous is not a tell but understanding humor has never been my strong suit.

[IceGuy]

Where the hell do you get that enomis is lurkerscum?

And there we have our opportunistic lurkerscum. This is your first post out of RVS and all you're doing is voting the prevalent wagon with a non-sequitur.

Nice dodging. Try again.

That's not a dodge, that's the actual reason.

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second.

Nice try to spin my argument.

[enomis]

Where the hell do you get that enomis is lurkerscum?

And there we have our opportunistic lurkerscum. This is your first post out of RVS and all you're doing is voting the prevalent wagon with a non-sequitur.

Nice dodging. Try again.

That's not a dodge, that's the actual reason.

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second.

Nice try to spin my argument.

No.I gotta clarify myself. First, i did not lurk. Secondly, i did not laid low. Thirdly, do you count the SC wagon then as a major wagon? Is two people to you a major wagon? If it is so then, i would have just jump on the whisper wagon? Well, i do have faults for not posting my thoughts with my vote.

[StrangerCoug]

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second..

Less than 25 hours is an awfully short time to be lurking and your posts are further apart. Why, then, shouldn't I add lurking to the case against you?

Ladies and gentlemen, Thor665's shenanigans are nothing compared to this crap I'm getting from IceGuy. Let's wagon him.

[enomis]

Thor665 had not made the comment about taking the policy lynch of whispersilk seriously.

So? Its suppose to be the RVS stage.

[StrangerCoug]

Anything serious is, by definintion, not RVS.

[enomis]

Anything serious is, by definintion, not RVS.

But you just said he did not make the comment seriously.

[farside22]

@Thor: I think you missed my vote.

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second..

Less than 25 hours is an awfully short time to be lurking and your posts are further apart. Why, then, shouldn't I add lurking to the case against you?

Ladies and gentlemen, Thor665's shenanigans are nothing compared to this crap I'm getting from IceGuy. Let's wagon him.

Wow you really a making a mountain into a molehill here. Your focasing so hard on the lurker part you just role over and ignored everything else.
Talk about pushing a weak case.

Where the hell do you get that enomis is lurkerscum?

And there we have our opportunistic lurkerscum. This is your first post out of RVS and all you're doing is voting the prevalent wagon with a non-sequitur.

Nice dodging. Try again.

That's not a dodge, that's the actual reason.

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second.

Nice try to spin my argument.

No.I gotta clarify myself. First, i did not lurk. Secondly, i did not laid low. Thirdly, do you count the SC wagon then as a major wagon? Is two people to you a major wagon? If it is so then, i would have just jump on the whisper wagon? Well, i do have faults for not posting my thoughts with my vote.

Here was my view. You voted for SC for no reason and did so without expanding. Many look at this as lurkersom and certainly opportunistic. The wagon on SC has chance more then Whispering. Being invisible and saying little is what many expect scum to be. It's also why I called you scum in my post. There was no reason not to explain your reason's for your vote at the time.

---

Fixed broken tags - Mod

[IceGuy]

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second..

Less than 25 hours is an awfully short time to be lurking and your posts are further apart. Why, then, shouldn't I add lurking to the case against you?

How about, you know, reading what I post?

Lurking is

not

the cornerstone of my argument. It's lurking

and then

voting the main wagon with a non-sequitur justification.

[farside22]

Mod: Please fix the quote above please..... I sent you a PM on how it should look.

@SC: Why did you vote for Thor?

[enomis]

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second..

Less than 25 hours is an awfully short time to be lurking and your posts are further apart. Why, then, shouldn't I add lurking to the case against you?

Ladies and gentlemen, Thor665's shenanigans are nothing compared to this crap I'm getting from IceGuy. Let's wagon him.

Where the hell do you get that enomis is lurkerscum?

Wow you really a making a mountain into a molehill here. Your focasing so hard on the lurker part you just role over and ignored everything else.
Talk about pushing a weak case.

And there we have our opportunistic lurkerscum. This is your first post out of RVS and all you're doing is voting the prevalent wagon with a non-sequitur.

Nice dodging. Try again.

That's not a dodge, that's the actual reason.

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second.

Nice try to spin my argument.

No.I gotta clarify myself. First, i did not lurk. Secondly, i did not laid low. Thirdly, do you count the SC wagon then as a major wagon? Is two people to you a major wagon? If it is so then, i would have just jump on the whisper wagon? Well, i do have faults for not posting my thoughts with my vote.

Here was my view. You voted for SC for no reason and did so without expanding. Many look at this as lurkersom and certainly opportunistic. The wagon on SC has chance more then Whispering. Being invisible and saying little is what many expect scum to be. It's also why I called you scum in my post. There was no reason not to explain your reason's for your vote at the time.

No i did not say 'nice dodging trying again' and i admitted it is my fault for not posting my reasons with my fault.

[StrangerCoug]

But you just said he did not make the comment seriously.

It's Thor665, not me, that denies he was serious.

I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second..

Less than 25 hours is an awfully short time to be lurking and your posts are further apart. Why, then, shouldn't I add lurking to the case against you?

How about, you know, reading what I post?

Lurking is

not

the cornerstone of my argument. It's lurking

and then

voting the main wagon with a non-sequitur justification.

Lurking is still a seriously unfounded accusation to be making against IceGuy. If I had a problem with either the act of voting the wagon itself or you accusing such, I'd be arguing that.

@SC: Why did you vote for Thor?

Asked and answered. See post #44. If you have a problem with my answer there, address it.

[Darox]

Votecount the second

StrangerCoug (4) - MagnaofIllusion, Thor665, enomis, farside22
Thor665 (2) - SnakePlissken, whispersilk
popsofctown (1) - Riceballtail
Riceballtail (1) - popsofctown
Yates (1) - jerobbo
jerobbo (1) - Yates
enomis (1) - IceGuy
IceGuy (1) - StrangerCoug

Not voting (1) - NachoMomma8

[popsofctown]

I do dislike and vote people who suggest policy lynching as it tends to be anti-information; however, I've been accused of policy lynching policy lynchers (in a game where I was scum, if I remember correctly), so I have to be careful with my accusation of this. Thor665's post looks closer to a random bandwagoning stage post, and even though I'm against the RBS as well, fighting the stage is unproductive.The RVS stage is pretty much over in my eyes, so I will UNVOTE: ; however, nobody stands out as scummy and it's a little late for me to think right now.

In light of Pops' random guessing stage I see not one but two scum-driven statements / actions in this post.

First person to correctly identify them and join me in voting StrangerCoug gets a delicious Internet Cookie*

UNVOTE: Whisper
VOTE: StrangerCoug

* - Disclaimer : Your definition of delicious or what constitutes and actual cookie may vary from mine. No actual cookie will be delivered.

Serious image management when he metas himself, survivor-scum tell.

His position on the RVS stage seems like a wave that appears like a particle if you observe it. It's unproductive, yet he participates in it, thus encouraging it.

I'm either 0/2 or 1/2.

Thor665 had not made the comment about taking the policy lynch of whispersilk seriously.

So? Its suppose to be the RVS stage.

No. It is the RGS stage until I announce the RGS stage is over, write a flavor scene in which the RGS stage ends, and then denounce the RGS stage and unvote my RGS vote, then idle around waiting for something to happen.

[StrangerCoug]

RGS?

[Thor665]

Random guessing stage?
A more accurate term, maybe - since the votes are never random.

[popsofctown]

That's been made explicit. Neither of you are paying attention.

[whispersilk]

Obviously neither of them

really

read post #65.

[whispersilk]

Or post #33.

[popsofctown]

You forgot post 20. It only contains one word that starts with 'g', so both of them are smart enough to figure that out.

[Thor665]

I was smart enough to figure it out without having to go back, so huzzah me.

[popsofctown]

You thought it was just another name for RVS though. But you are correct that coug is a more grave offender.

[Thor665]

Sweet - vote him for it.