Good vs Evil, Law vs Chaos Reboot - Game Over, Good wins

[ManiacalLemon]

Man I had totally thought we'd be skipping over RVS again =/
So lets discuss other things.
Lemon. What scum role are you?

/Moneybags

[sarcasm]I am a jester that's role is switched to survivor when I'm lynched [/sarcasm]
Sorry, I couldn't resist.

[Foxace36]

1. 3

2. Haven't checked in a while. Its like 3.8+

3. Dancing. (Inb4ballet. Nope, its called popping. Dope ass shit, look it up)

4. Get rid of all the scum.

5. It's fucking amazing, that's why.

6. It's RVS. I was fucking around. Rigs because he likes P&T and ML because he unvoted during RVS. I voted purely out of trolling and the fact that it IS RVS.






Now tell me this....
Why did YOU vote for me?

Is it just another RVS vote or something more?

[Mastermind of Sin]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mastermind of Sin
For being a Niblonian! Also, for being in scum in Consulmaker :3

Lies! Well, on one of them at least.

Kill all the orcs! Start with their leader!

Vote: Lord Mhork

[brizingre1]

VOTE:ManiacialLemon

, obv scum.

VOTE: brizingre1

We do not like his lack of stance on the mass alignment claim.

Are you mixing me up with someone like RangTangler, if you read through the old game thread you'll find I was fairly clearly anti a mass roleclaim.

My suspects atm are RangTangler, xvart, Maniacal Lemon and Skeletor, due to the old thread, and I haven't really gained much impression from this thread so far

[Seacore]

Vote Count 1.1

ManiacalLemon (5) -

Guy_Named_Riggs, Foxace36, kondi2424, Shadoweh, brizingre1

Foxace36 (1) -

Norman

Shadoweh (1) -

Lord Mhork

brizingre1 (1) -

MaguaofIllusion

CooLDoG (1) -

ManiacalLemon

Lord Mhork (1) -

Mastermind of Sin

Not Voting (16) - Pine, Empking, AurorusVox, PeregrineV, Y u no scum, LynchMePls, greenknight, CooLDoG, trekker, Tammy, Feysal, Skenvoy, Jackal711, Zdenek, Shadow1psc, Haze

(expired on 2012-04-02 00:00:00)
With 26 alive, 14 are needed to secure a lynch.

In other news, thanks heaps to Feysal and Zdenek for saving the pre-crash records, and thanks to everybody else for sticking with the game and/or helping me out by replacing in.

[Shadoweh]

Lemon I think you'll find that is neither funny or likely to stop people from voting you.
The other Shadow: The old Day 1 is linked in the third mod post. Not hard to find.
If I see the word RVS one more time I'm gonna put a cap in someone's posterior.

Mod - In fairness, I hadn't put the link in until Shadow's post motivated me to do so.

[CooLDoG]

Hello, I'm here.

@MoS, did you put that vote on the right person?
@Lemon, what is your reason for voting me (RVS???)?
@Shadow, put one in mine.

[Mastermind of Sin]

?

[MaguaofIllusion]

And we’re back … back again –

Hey other head? Can we lynch Norman? I totally want to.

Post 22 is totes scummy. And he’s clearly at amateur troll given he’s been banned before and his cheeky antics in the reboot thread. We can’t have any amateurs getting in the way of our professional trolling!

VOTE: Norman

Hey Norman – I’m not answering your pointless non-scum hunting questions since they are fluffily scummy. I’m going to lynch you instead. Want to make something of it?

--

Also let’s not start the whole “Let’s mass-claim discussion” again shall we? It benefits Scum more than Town and is at best MD discussion. We can look back and find who is scummy for wanting in later.

[LimMePls]

So, I was able to read Feysal's reply to my mass-alignment claim idea, and I now see what he meant about it being terrible. So ya, I don't think we should do that.

Vote: Rang Tangler

Still not RVS. Others should vote here too.

[LimMePls]

Wait, who replaced Rang?

[LimMePls]

unvote
Vote: kondi2424

Sucks to replace into a caught scum slot.

[Pine]

Damn you MoI. I read 22 and practically squealed with glee at finding scum on page 1. But you pointed it out before I could

Seriously, 22 is completely useless, and worse, it's willfully obstructive.

Vote: Norman

[Shadow1psc]

Lemon I think you'll find that is neither funny or likely to stop people from voting you.
The other Shadow: The old Day 1 is linked in the third mod post. Not hard to find.
If I see the word RVS one more time I'm gonna put a cap in someone's posterior.

Mod - In fairness, I hadn't put the link in until Shadow's post motivated me to do so.

<3

[Empking]

Vote: ML

- Getting into the groove boy.

[Foxace36]

UNVOTE:



@Pine
Your vote sounds like your just trying to jump on a bandwagon against another player. You never even gave Norman the chance to retort to what MoI has posted. You are basically agreeing with him and throwing the lame "I totally saw that too and was going to say the same thing" excuse and then going on to agree with him.

I am tempted to place a pressure vote on you but that's really not my thing. I want to hear what you have to say to this.

[MaguaofIllusion]

So Empking are you scum this game? If not you should be sheeping us.

@Pine

- Um … MoI isn’t a part of this hydra. Didn’t you see our Sig?

I’d totally vote Foxace for Post 40 where he unvotes what I assume is RVS and doesn’t revote despite saying Pine is scummy. That is if I wasn’t already voting scum Norman.

[MaguaofIllusion]

You know what ... I'm not waiting for my other head ... I'm a rebel!

Stab - Foxace

[Shadow1psc]

UNVOTE:



@Pine
Your vote sounds like your just trying to jump on a bandwagon against another player. You never even gave Norman the chance to retort to what MoI has posted. You are basically agreeing with him and throwing the lame "I totally saw that too and was going to say the same thing" excuse and then going on to agree with him.

I am tempted to place a pressure vote on you but that's really not my thing. I want to hear what you have to say to this.

I really hate non-committal posts like this.

VOTE: Foxace36

[Foxace36]

So Empking are you scum this game? If not you should be sheeping us.

@Pine

- Um … MoI isn’t a part of this hydra. Didn’t you see our Sig?

I’d totally vote Foxace for Post 40 where he unvotes what I assume is RVS and doesn’t revote despite saying Pine is scummy. That is if I wasn’t already voting scum Norman.

I didn't revote because I'm not the type of player that likes to throw out votes willy nilly. I like to hear the player's defenses and what they have to say for themselves before I do anything hasty.

If I vote for you then you know damned well that I have good reason too and I'm not likely going to be convinced otherwise. It takes a lot for me to vote for someone.

[Empking]

Unvote
Vote: Briz

I can't argue with that logic.

[Shadow1psc]

So Empking are you scum this game? If not you should be sheeping us.

@Pine

- Um … MoI isn’t a part of this hydra. Didn’t you see our Sig?

I’d totally vote Foxace for Post 40 where he unvotes what I assume is RVS and doesn’t revote despite saying Pine is scummy. That is if I wasn’t already voting scum Norman.

I didn't revote because I'm not the type of player that likes to throw out votes willy nilly. I like to hear the player's defenses and what they have to say for themselves before I do anything hasty.

If I vote for you then you know damned well that I have good reason too and I'm not likely going to be convinced otherwise. It takes a lot for me to vote for someone.

That's like, the opposite of what you want to be doing.

[Foxace36]

So Empking are you scum this game? If not you should be sheeping us.

@Pine

- Um … MoI isn’t a part of this hydra. Didn’t you see our Sig?

I’d totally vote Foxace for Post 40 where he unvotes what I assume is RVS and doesn’t revote despite saying Pine is scummy. That is if I wasn’t already voting scum Norman.

I didn't revote because I'm not the type of player that likes to throw out votes willy nilly. I like to hear the player's defenses and what they have to say for themselves before I do anything hasty.

If I vote for you then you know damned well that I have good reason too and I'm not likely going to be convinced otherwise. It takes a lot for me to vote for someone.

That's like, the opposite of what you want to be doing.

Why is that? Please elaborate.


I want to make sure that I believe someone is scum before I vote for them. If I were to do otherwise than there is more of a chance to mislynch someone.

[Shadow1psc]

So Empking are you scum this game? If not you should be sheeping us.

@Pine

- Um … MoI isn’t a part of this hydra. Didn’t you see our Sig?

I’d totally vote Foxace for Post 40 where he unvotes what I assume is RVS and doesn’t revote despite saying Pine is scummy. That is if I wasn’t already voting scum Norman.

I didn't revote because I'm not the type of player that likes to throw out votes willy nilly. I like to hear the player's defenses and what they have to say for themselves before I do anything hasty.

If I vote for you then you know damned well that I have good reason too and I'm not likely going to be convinced otherwise. It takes a lot for me to vote for someone.

That's like, the opposite of what you want to be doing.

Why is that? Please elaborate.


I want to make sure that I believe someone is scum before I vote for them. If I were to do otherwise than there is more of a chance to mislynch someone.

Your only way of pressuring someone is your vote. Saying "Well, I'd

like

to vote you" does two things;

1) Tells this person they can ignore you. No pressure, no reason to regard your 'suspicion' as anything important.
2) Paints you as non-committal and scummy. You don't throw your hat into VCA, there's no hard record of your stance so you can, come that person's flip, take whichever stance benefits you most.

[Foxace36]

So Empking are you scum this game? If not you should be sheeping us.

@Pine

- Um … MoI isn’t a part of this hydra. Didn’t you see our Sig?

I’d totally vote Foxace for Post 40 where he unvotes what I assume is RVS and doesn’t revote despite saying Pine is scummy. That is if I wasn’t already voting scum Norman.

I didn't revote because I'm not the type of player that likes to throw out votes willy nilly. I like to hear the player's defenses and what they have to say for themselves before I do anything hasty.

If I vote for you then you know damned well that I have good reason too and I'm not likely going to be convinced otherwise. It takes a lot for me to vote for someone.

That's like, the opposite of what you want to be doing.

Why is that? Please elaborate.


I want to make sure that I believe someone is scum before I vote for them. If I were to do otherwise than there is more of a chance to mislynch someone.

Your only way of pressuring someone is your vote. Saying "Well, I'd

like

to vote you" does two things;

1) Tells this person they can ignore you. No pressure, no reason to regard your 'suspicion' as anything important.
2) Paints you as non-committal and scummy. You don't throw your hat into VCA, there's no hard record of your stance so you can, come that person's flip, take whichever stance benefits you most.

Well, this site certainly plays this game differently then. If it's really that much of a bother....

VOTE: Pine

My vote stand unless convinced otherwise.