vijay wrote:
Also, why did you leave Glass out? He also agrees with the idea.
Because Im obv-town.
action wrote:
That was me wondering why you were ok with Otto VOTING vijay but not ok with rylai VOTING vijay. I never implied that you thought or should have thought that Otto was scum. Seriously, read that sentence twice .
Where did I say I was not okay with rylai voting vijay?
action wrote:
You said much eariler that you agreed with Vijay's case against Rylai, so don't give me that BS that you are voting Rylai because of the above paragraph.
I am pretty sure I know the reason for my rylai vote better than you. It doesn't even make sense that that is the reason I am voting rylai, if that were the case I would have voted for him when I agreed with the case, no?
It is only after rylai made that post that I felt that he was potentially scummier than vijay, hence why I unvoted in my post addressing it.
action wrote:(Which incidentally is :bad logic: on Rlai's part, but since no vote was attached, it isn't particulary scummy)
action wrote:
However you still haven't said why your suspcion of Vijay vanished into thin air.
Because it hasn't. It is just that my suspicion of you+rylai+malth is now greater than vijay, and nothing new has come out of vijay for me to question.
action wrote:
Your vote on me is absurb. I will defend my town reads vigorously from being mislynched. Suddenly I'm buddying the guy you think is scum, is that right? (btw, Lopsy is more of a town read than Rylai, by the slightest bit)
Defending your town read is one thing, attacking an attacker simply because he is an attacker (AKA chainsaw defense) is something completely different.
@Malth
Do you still think that delta's claim is fake?