Lopsy wrote:This is ridiculous.
First of all: "...power role info will be lost due to wasting it sorting you out..." No, Delta claimed miller.
Second of all, Korlash says lynching Delta isn't about gaining information (which is correct - it gains the least information out of all possible lynches), but later he says we gain more information throughout. [@Korlash: What am I missing? How does removing Delta create a "better game"?]
Finally, none of Korlash's post gives actual tangible reasons for why we should suspect DeltaWave's claim of being false. All of his post is saying, in essence, "well, this lynch is at least as legitimate as a policy lynch, so we should make this lynch."
Here's an argument for Delta's claim being real: he claimed in the very first post of the entire game and wasn't counterclaimed in a game which is likely to contain a miller by its very theme. He's town, dude.
Funny... I wrote that paragraph due entirely to Delta using that very same word... He doesn't actually read what I say either... You two make a fun pair to play with. :\
Before we start brow-beating each other, you do know I have been arguing AGAINST lynching Delta right? no? of course not, you would have had to actually read what I've been posting to know that... Ok, lets get started.
First off: Yeah. And what was delta's response? "If someone wants to vig me, then do so..." We waste a vig... on a townie... My point. that's one nothing.
Second off: Removing a questionable claim removes all the time the rest of us spend worrying about him. If five people have suspicions of player B, then a majority of the game will be spent with those people talking, voting, arguing with, and more or less wasting time with player B. Remove player B from the equation, and those five people can now spend all that time actually scum hunting. Case in point, how many people are voting Delta? Three. How many are wasting time discussing him and his lynch? two. That's five fucking people wasting time on someone most likely town. Now imagine this happening for the next two days. My point. Two-nothing.
Finally: I never said we should make this lynch. You've now lied and shown how inept you are in this argument. My point. Three nothing.
(For the record, I have merely present an argument towards Delta to show him that his lynch IS viable. I have not pushed it nor suggested we actually do it.)
Unfortunately, there are some people in this game that don't believe his claim. I attempted to put those doubt to rest and Delta let me down. I will continue to defend his claim with all my available resources so long as it remains valid, but at the end of the day if he proves to be too much of a distraction his lynch is still valid and credible.
My last word: You've assumed this set-up has a miller in it simply because it is themed around cops. Why? And why would a setup about cops, that contains a miller, make that role completely unique? Why not two? You've not only resorted to confirming a player based on your own assumption of the setup, but have now started condemning others who do not share your opinion. Stop it. My assertions about his claim have been grounded in hard evidence and facts based on his playing and actions. I have never stooped so low as to assume I knew shit about his role. If you're going to resort to calling me scum based on pure speculation, well... Just be glad I have no intention of turning it around on you because it wouldn't be hard.
(Again, for the record. I'VE BEEN SAYING HE IS TOWN... WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM, "DUDE"?) [Caps lock? Nope, real people hold the shift key <3]
Grow up and vote V2V so we can see actual progress. Don't waste my time with this meaningless discussion about a player we both think is town until you have something competent to say.
=D (Smiley face because I'm not actually the asshole I appear to be.)