Stuff I need to address.
↑ Firestarter wrote:NN, please explain to me why my vote contradicts my base reads?
NN
- answer my query please.
↑ DeasVail wrote:My main problem is the rack read and vote, as he does not acknowledge agreement with everyone else and presents his reasoning as his own.
DV
- So let me see, the reason you have a problem with my rack vote is because I presented reasoning of my own... I fail to see how that is even remotely scummy, explain please?
↑ Nero Cain wrote:though I have to agree that fire is very probable scum. Psyche is his #1 but he joins the rack wagon?
Nero
- You might want to read my #299 - when you have read it, please come back and tell me if I'm still probable scum.
↑ mastin2 wrote:Ohgod. Oh, god. Firestarter. really. is. scum. That post. just.
so. IioA, bad reads, scummy tone...
mastin2
- OhMyGAWDOverreactionMuch...
↑ mastin2 wrote:Firestarter tripped dozens of scumtells in that post, and is now on my scumlist above drmy. Specifics later (need to type them up).
Specifics and explanation required please?
Firestarter wrote:Kublai Khan - Town-read
Most of what KK has written so far I agree with, except maybe the stance on scooby.
I agree with Pine here, that death shouldn't be in the pipeline for someone who only posted
once, and that was to confirm.
I came in and did the same thing, confirmed. Where was the pressure on me?
KK
- The bold part in the above quote should not have been aimed at you, it should have been aimed at TML, as it was he who suggested killing scooby for "Confirm without content".
I've re-read the interactions between you and Pine regarding scooby, and it seems I got my wires crossed.
TML - scooby should die.
Pine - WTF
KK - scooby deserving of pressure, but not death.
So yeah, wires crossed.
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Firestarter post...hmmm, not too sure on it right now, gut tells me something is off about it. But it is just gut.
jason
- More "firestarter is scum", but no explanation - please explain?
↑ Pine wrote:The suspicion of Firestarter has merit.
Pine
- Yep, you guessed it, explanation of the above is required please?
~
~
↑ redFF wrote:Firestarted came into the thread very late and posts his catchup post, which is literally just a summary of the game.
Then lists a reasonless scum read on rack(of course, when everyone else is doing it, why not?)
I thought this part of his post was particularly silly
Nero Cain - Scum-read
The Shotty incident. PL'ing him. Not gonna happen.
You say you were not the one to bring up the idea that shotty should be PL'ed.
But you grabbed the baton and ran with it anyway.
When you were quizzed on it, you failed to deliver anything in the way of proof that shotty
was a VI. Yes, those who were questioning you could have looked for it themselves,
but the BoP lies with you.
redFF - Null-read
On my re-read, I found this slot to be one of the tougher reads for some reason.
As I've said before, the whole Policy Lynching thing is not my bag.
I disagree with it, but as stand alone point in ones ISO, not worthy of being called scum for.
So nero cain is a scumread for
- wanting to pl shotty
- saying he was not the one who brought it up (which is true)
- "grabbing the baton and running with it" (he never denied this)
- failing to prove how
shotty
is a bad player... (hint that's something he doesn't need to prove, even looking at only shotty's posts from this game)
So all that makes nero cain a scumread, K.
Now I'm a null read, even though nero seems to be a scumread purely from pushing a policy lynch, and firestarter says
As I've said before, the whole Policy Lynching thing is not my bag.
I disagree with it, but as stand alone point in ones ISO, not worthy of being called scum for.
???
As for his other reads, scum read on psyche, one of the bigger pushers of rack all game. You can't really have a scumread on both of them buddy.
RedFF
- First of all, the summary is for me. It may help others in the future, but what I always do, WHAT I ALWAYS DO, is post my thoughts in-game.
Regarding my rack vote, momentum was gathering and he just happened to be a scum read of mine.
(I assume you have by now, seen my subsequent post after I gave out my reads, that my lists were in no particular order?)
At the time I posted my reads, Psyche had about 3 posts? None with any real content except a rack vote.
rack had been gathering momentum so scum coming into the game and slapping a vote onto a player that was on the way to being
bandwagoned looked opportunistic. iirc correctly I was read up to #229.
At that time Psyche
WAS NOT
one of the bigger pushers of rack -
this is lies
.
Regarding Nero & you, red, on the PL issues... It's more a gut feeling I have.
You've been quite brazen about wanting a shotty PL, whereas Nero got very defensive about it.
So, Nero remains a scum-read, you a null-read.
~
Ill get to everything else tomorrow.