↑ iStark wrote:I'm lost at what you're trying to ask.
I voted Hiplop for above reasons on D1.
That day ended with Korlash wasting lynch in my absence.( I found it scummy and felt he needed to be lynched immediately on D2)
So,I voted korlash on D2 and stayed with it.
What exactly in this sequence is not clear to you? or how is this even relevant to each other? -____-
Are you sure you're asking this to right person? because I didn't change vote to Hiplop when I thought korlash was scum.
A hypo claim is you claiming cop/investigative/any other results even if you're not a cop or PR. That way, after a cop/PR dies, we can see his results each night, but (s)he's not outing himself.
Here was your post on the morning of / night before the day one deadline:
↑ iStark wrote:@Rat, I don't know if you realize this or not, but I could have easily shipped my vote on you if I wanted when korlash was asking for it.
@Korlash, you better have good reasons if you're not scum for this stunt *thinks of certain game and your scum reads due to this same gambit*
I don't buy it.
You are suspicious of Korlash in it, but you don't vote for him and the next day you are suspicious of Korlash for wasting a lynch. This makes absolutely no sense, if you were at all concerned about wasting a lynch, you would have voted for Korlash in that post.
I think that iStark is scum, who wanted to avoid bussing Korlash, but who also wanted to get credit some credit for being right about him when he flipped scum.
Considering this is a theme game with unusual roles, a dead investigative role and a 1 shot doc is out, I don't think that hypoclaiming will be useful.