UberNinja wrote:I am very serious about lynching shos. I won't lie, I have pulled the white-knighting thing as scum before (the game was deleted), but I am really genuine in my reasons for not wanting to lynch shos (yet). Namely, because I just won a game as scum where we lynched town Day 1 in 3 pages and town never recovered from the suspicion and infighting brought about as to whose fault that was. If I was scum, I kid you not, I would have ridden his wagon until death did us part.
What, exactly, is the argument against shos? The only point brought up against him seems to be OMGUSing his voters during what he (and I) thought was RVS and “flailing” when he expressed bemusement over being voted. The way he reacted to his wagon doesn’t seem scummy to me.
UberNinja wrote:Why vote me without reasoning, and then say someone else is going to give you headaches?
I voted you because I thought you were scummy. I said that Parama would give me headaches because I find players with his playstyle hard to read. I’m not sure why this distinction is lost on you.
As for why I didn’t state my reasons for voting you, I wanted to see who was thinking along the same lines as me so that I could identify them as more likely town, which I now see shos as.
Quilford wrote:a) Just because their reasoning for Parama being scum is valid doesn't mean he is scum. That's what mislynches are.
b) Getting shitty gut reactions does not equal thinking someone is scum. This is the same mistake that Nuwen made and the resulting argument which it spawned has completely consumed my recent posts. I'm at a loss as to how you've missed them.
While I now understand your argument, it wasn't clear to me from your original post and I don't think it was obvious either. But okay.