your voting him, so you think hes scum
since i cant be scum, shouldnt you be happy that i think hes scum?
↑ Om of the Nom wrote:They aren't cases. They are individual points aimed to make me look scummy, when those points aren't even scummy things.
↑ Chrimi wrote:Slandaar is playing great at getting reactions.
However, I don't like the way he is doing it.
I have a town read on Slandaar, but he really needs to not act the way he is, because it's very anti-town.
And Slandaar, if you're going to try and reaction test, please make it a little more subtle. The manipulativeness was 0 in what he was saying, and based on your vocabulary and gameplay so far I am assuming you knew that and was only reaction-testing.
If you were reaction-testing, town read. You may be trying to get whatever you can on other people, which would be much scummier.
Ugh, I'm not used to this kind of gameplay. Alright, let's see here...
Until I get some kind of response that is noteworthy and explains well, I shall...
VOTE: Slandaar
↑ Slandaar wrote:↑ Om of the Nom wrote:
I'm kinda wary of kondi and Slandaar right now. This may sound wierd, but they seem more concerned with making cases and being active than I remember from their town meta. Yes, I get this is what town are supposed to be like, but it just feels off to me.
Om has 10 pages of meta on me. This is not very much, this is also very wrong from what I remember but thats not really the issue.
Om knows this;
↑ Om of the Nom wrote:
Of course, this could just be me being fail and forgetting half of their town meta, if that's the case, then just disregard this.
He knows that he doesn't really have adequate meta to be accurate so throws in an out when his meta read is challenged.
He cant possibly think he knows 'half my town meta' from ten pages let alone my full meta.
He then tries to defend his read with '10 pages is enough' then what was the point in the above quote? he surely knows my meta because 10 pages is enough, so why the doubt that he might not? Its because he knows its not enough.
His read is completely fabricated. His general read list shows a complete lack of reads bar gut and fake meta reads. Meta reads and gut reads require very little commitment, leaving him open for change later which is further backed up by his 'I could be wrong though if so disregard!' They are also very easy to invent as scum requiring little explanation.
His reaction to my vote is bad, he tries to get me to post content for which he can defend himself instead of just explainign a town read (vijay) which could have helped read him. It also shows a great hypocrisy that he can have gut reads that he doesn't need to explain but I can't
Basically hes scum.
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:Ugh what is this? OOTN sounds like a cornered townie imo. Slandaar's pressure is good, but it's coming close to confirmation bias imo. I played with him before and the meta is fairly similar, which is null, but gut gives me a slight town read.
@ Mod: could we get kondi in here please? Thank you.
↑ Slandaar wrote:↑ Om of the Nom wrote:Vote hopping can be a scumtell depending no the context.
it is a scumtell when you do it during the day with no deadlines nearby and no clear reason.
Obviously you were insinuating this
↑ Om of the Nom wrote:I see it as scum vote hopping.
as shown here
Therefore you are saying I am scum for vote hopping, I am scum based on meta, yet my meta says votehopping = town.
You cant use meta when it suits you and not when it doesnt. (well you can when you are scum, or try to)
or you want to admit you dont know my meta and just fabricated your read on me again making you scum... (this is the case)
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:Thomith, your sig. Best song ever. Regarding the game, I'm guessing you're insinuating OOTN - newbscum?
OOTN still is cornered townie lashing out at his attackers. Also, I believe that he was wrong about knowing your meta, but has no space to back down.
Chrimi, I was going to say you would play better if you stopped posting like everybody you talk to is 12. Then I remembered your actually quite close to that age yourself X.X
↑ Slandaar wrote:Meta reads are very easy to makeup to look like you are scumhunting.
He defends himself from me saying 10pages is clearly not enough to meta someone on but later wants me to meta him, which shows complete hypocrisy as if his read is good, I have the same meta on him as he on me therefore I know his meta like he knows mine. Yet it shows he knows 10pages isnt enough. Making him scum.
↑ Chrimi wrote:Makes his current logic bad. His current logic is faulty because he is being pressured hard.
Cornered townie, as vijay said. Defending from his attacker(s). Slandaar, somebody's case being bad does not make them scum, it makes the case bad and that's it. Both scum and townies can make bad cases, it happens all the time.
So, I agree Om your logic on the situation is at fault, but I do not believe he is scum.
P-edit: Thomith, he is fighting back and defending, if he just backed down Slandaar would move in and continue making points and asking for an answer. Om is answering and defending, like anybody would. A bad defense means a townie that has given up, anyways. Fighting back and defending means a strong town who is trying to understand why Slandaar is tunneling him.
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:@ Asher: my gut has served me very well in the past, as well as my metaing. I know how to use both. I'm not going to be right all the time, but more often than not.
When I bring up Thomith's meta, it's because he's playing fairly similar to that previous game. The fact that he flipped town in that one gives me a gut town read. Also, POE is another way of scumhunting, and something I've been trying to integrate to my skillset.
Regarding pressure, I believe it's you being short-sighted. Well not short-sighted, but more not considering both sides of the coin. Sure pressure can be imposed in the long term by questioning statements made, but why wait for that when you can pressure now? Furthermore, shouldn't early pressure provide you with more ammunition for late pressure as scum crack and flail?
↑ Slandaar wrote:
Chrimi and reaction testing:
I think you are town but im voting you untill you meet my demands.
Pressure by calling said person town; 0. Noone is going to actually stick to a vote on someone they think is town IF they are town themselves.
What reaction would be a town reaction to a no pressure vote exactly Chrimi? coming at you guns blazing? thats a strong reaction right? so thats town? doesnt seem to make much sense especially the tone of your OMGUS post recently.
So my reaction was always destined to get scumpoints wasn't it? your test was not impartial, thereby making you scum.
also explain the benefits of voting me for being antitown over kass for being antitown? who is being more antitown hm?
Oh but whatever alignment kass is as scum you want to keep him alive...
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Chrimi
this guys scum hes just been posting reactionary stuff and done approximately 0 scumhunting.
It actually makes more sense hes defending kass due to kass being useless so as scum he wants to keep him around rather than being buddies, the connection between the 2 is too obvious.
↑ Fat_Tony wrote:For the record, I would really have preferred it if Slandaar had not died today, he was active (if a bit flaily) and had he not made the Worst Claim Ever (TM) then maybe he'd have lived. Allowing him to live overnight just muddies everything up tomorrow and we can't afford to get bogged down in ridiculous WIFOM all day in D2. You had to die, even though it should have been Kass the whole time.
Pre-edit: What would your notes have done if you were going to hammer straight afterwards anyway? You would have given wolves more info to work with. Save them for tomorrow, they'll still be valid.
↑ Chrimi wrote:Slandaar is playing great at getting reactions.
However, I don't like the way he is doing it.
I have a town read on Slandaar, but he really needs to not act the way he is, because it's very anti-town.
And Slandaar, if you're going to try and reaction test, please make it a little more subtle. The manipulativeness was 0 in what he was saying, and based on your vocabulary and gameplay so far I am assuming you knew that and was only reaction-testing.
If you were reaction-testing, town read. You may be trying to get whatever you can on other people, which would be much scummier.
Ugh, I'm not used to this kind of gameplay. Alright, let's see here...
Until I get some kind of response that is noteworthy and explains well, I shall...
VOTE: Slandaar
↑ Slandaar wrote:↑ Om of the Nom wrote:
I'm kinda wary of kondi and Slandaar right now. This may sound wierd, but they seem more concerned with making cases and being active than I remember from their town meta. Yes, I get this is what town are supposed to be like, but it just feels off to me.
Om has 10 pages of meta on me. This is not very much, this is also very wrong from what I remember but thats not really the issue.
Om knows this;
↑ Om of the Nom wrote:
Of course, this could just be me being fail and forgetting half of their town meta, if that's the case, then just disregard this.
He knows that he doesn't really have adequate meta to be accurate so throws in an out when his meta read is challenged.
He cant possibly think he knows 'half my town meta' from ten pages let alone my full meta.
He then tries to defend his read with '10 pages is enough' then what was the point in the above quote? he surely knows my meta because 10 pages is enough, so why the doubt that he might not? Its because he knows its not enough.
His read is completely fabricated. His general read list shows a complete lack of reads bar gut and fake meta reads. Meta reads and gut reads require very little commitment, leaving him open for change later which is further backed up by his 'I could be wrong though if so disregard!' They are also very easy to invent as scum requiring little explanation.
His reaction to my vote is bad, he tries to get me to post content for which he can defend himself instead of just explainign a town read (vijay) which could have helped read him. It also shows a great hypocrisy that he can have gut reads that he doesn't need to explain but I can't
Basically hes scum.
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:Ugh what is this? OOTN sounds like a cornered townie imo. Slandaar's pressure is good, but it's coming close to confirmation bias imo. I played with him before and the meta is fairly similar, which is null, but gut gives me a slight town read.
@ Mod: could we get kondi in here please? Thank you.
↑ Slandaar wrote:↑ Om of the Nom wrote:Vote hopping can be a scumtell depending no the context.
it is a scumtell when you do it during the day with no deadlines nearby and no clear reason.
Obviously you were insinuating this
↑ Om of the Nom wrote:I see it as scum vote hopping.
as shown here
Therefore you are saying I am scum for vote hopping, I am scum based on meta, yet my meta says votehopping = town.
You cant use meta when it suits you and not when it doesnt. (well you can when you are scum, or try to)
or you want to admit you dont know my meta and just fabricated your read on me again making you scum... (this is the case)
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:Thomith, your sig. Best song ever. Regarding the game, I'm guessing you're insinuating OOTN - newbscum?
OOTN still is cornered townie lashing out at his attackers. Also, I believe that he was wrong about knowing your meta, but has no space to back down.
Chrimi, I was going to say you would play better if you stopped posting like everybody you talk to is 12. Then I remembered your actually quite close to that age yourself X.X
↑ Slandaar wrote:Meta reads are very easy to makeup to look like you are scumhunting.
He defends himself from me saying 10pages is clearly not enough to meta someone on but later wants me to meta him, which shows complete hypocrisy as if his read is good, I have the same meta on him as he on me therefore I know his meta like he knows mine. Yet it shows he knows 10pages isnt enough. Making him scum.
↑ Chrimi wrote:Makes his current logic bad. His current logic is faulty because he is being pressured hard.
Cornered townie, as vijay said. Defending from his attacker(s). Slandaar, somebody's case being bad does not make them scum, it makes the case bad and that's it. Both scum and townies can make bad cases, it happens all the time.
So, I agree Om your logic on the situation is at fault, but I do not believe he is scum.
P-edit: Thomith, he is fighting back and defending, if he just backed down Slandaar would move in and continue making points and asking for an answer. Om is answering and defending, like anybody would. A bad defense means a townie that has given up, anyways. Fighting back and defending means a strong town who is trying to understand why Slandaar is tunneling him.
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:@ Asher: my gut has served me very well in the past, as well as my metaing. I know how to use both. I'm not going to be right all the time, but more often than not.
When I bring up Thomith's meta, it's because he's playing fairly similar to that previous game. The fact that he flipped town in that one gives me a gut town read. Also, POE is another way of scumhunting, and something I've been trying to integrate to my skillset.
Regarding pressure, I believe it's you being short-sighted. Well not short-sighted, but more not considering both sides of the coin. Sure pressure can be imposed in the long term by questioning statements made, but why wait for that when you can pressure now? Furthermore, shouldn't early pressure provide you with more ammunition for late pressure as scum crack and flail?
↑ Slandaar wrote:
Chrimi and reaction testing:
I think you are town but im voting you untill you meet my demands.
Pressure by calling said person town; 0. Noone is going to actually stick to a vote on someone they think is town IF they are town themselves.
What reaction would be a town reaction to a no pressure vote exactly Chrimi? coming at you guns blazing? thats a strong reaction right? so thats town? doesnt seem to make much sense especially the tone of your OMGUS post recently.
So my reaction was always destined to get scumpoints wasn't it? your test was not impartial, thereby making you scum.
also explain the benefits of voting me for being antitown over kass for being antitown? who is being more antitown hm?
Oh but whatever alignment kass is as scum you want to keep him alive...
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Chrimi
this guys scum hes just been posting reactionary stuff and done approximately 0 scumhunting.
It actually makes more sense hes defending kass due to kass being useless so as scum he wants to keep him around rather than being buddies, the connection between the 2 is too obvious.
↑ Fat_Tony wrote:For the record, I would really have preferred it if Slandaar had not died today, he was active (if a bit flaily) and had he not made the Worst Claim Ever (TM) then maybe he'd have lived. Allowing him to live overnight just muddies everything up tomorrow and we can't afford to get bogged down in ridiculous WIFOM all day in D2. You had to die, even though it should have been Kass the whole time.
Pre-edit: What would your notes have done if you were going to hammer straight afterwards anyway? You would have given wolves more info to work with. Save them for tomorrow, they'll still be valid.
↑ Thomith wrote:Kondi, you were saying slandaar was town yesturday, but he claimed seer, if you ARE the seer then why did you still act like slandaar was town as he would have been lying would he have not?
UNVOTE:
i would vote but L-1 early in the day probably wont help much.
Also chrimi you viewed me and slandaar as a scumteam so you changed the meaning of one of my posts to make it more believable?
VOTE: chrimi
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:@ Fat Tony: I don't understand that unvote. Are you claiming that you knew Chrimi was going to vote Kondi?
By the way, note the Chrimi-OMGUS.
Anyway, I still want kondi lynched. Kass is probably scum, so is Chrimi. But kondi gets rope today.
↑ Elmo TeH AzN wrote:VJ wouldn't that make Tony scum as well? Since he knew Chrimi was going to vote?
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:That seems to fit rather nicely. Who did Tony replace again?
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:But why would Tony say that he knew? That's a connection that goes under my too convenient to be scummy cabinet. Like sort of how some people are too scummy to actually be scum, if that makes sense. Tony is null for me atm.
↑ Elmo TeH AzN wrote:That's the problem though. Were dealing with multi scum teams as well here
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:So what exactly are you suggesting Elmo?
↑ Elmo TeH AzN wrote:↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:But why would Tony say that he knew? That's a connection that goes under my too convenient to be scummy cabinet. Like sort of how some people are too scummy to actually be scum, if that makes sense. Tony is null for me atm.
Too scummy to be scum. You can't look past that right now. With only one team being able to be found by seer and the other is basically a group of evil masons. You can't make an argument too scummy to be scum
↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:Well I have scumreads that I personally believe are stronger than Tony at the moment.