rat wrote:2. Slander? ROFLMAO. If you've been reading the game you would see that MoI has had the same sort of double standards about what is acceptable as Korlash has. Im not going to go dig through all these walls for you.
If you refuse to back up an accusation it becomes mere worthless slander. Refusal to support your accusations with evidence suggests one of the following:
A) You are not interested in the accusation you made, which is not what town do when they think they have found scum.
B) You have nothing to support it, and thus the accusation is nothing more than an attempt to slander the person you've attacked.
C) The attack you have presented is so bad/weak/wrong that attempting to back it up will show everyone else this is the case, so not backing it up is an attempt to avoid this.
Secondly, if you saw something and thus had notion to accuse someone of something then to back it up would not require you to "dig through these walls" since you have physically seen it all ready and should "know" where it is. (Or the general idea of where it is making finding it more easy than you're presenting it here)
Thirdly, if you are unable to remember where or when the examples are to reference, there is no reason you cannot remember the gist of what happened so you can describe the event. Doing this would put a small bit of burden on the people you attacked to defend themselves by looking the event up. Unless you can even muster this all burden of proof rests on you and your 'case', 'point', 'attack', or whatever you want to call it is proven shit because there is no supporting evidence.
This isn't a 'doubles standard' me and MOI have. It's good and proper play, end of story. And I defy you to find an instance of me or MOI ever neglecting to back up our attacks when asked to. Let alone when asked three fucking times.
Rat wrote:3. Someone doesnt need to do something inherently scummy for someone else to lose their townread of them.
This is true. What exactly did I do though to lose that town read?
