For now:
↑ Psyche wrote:Voting Bloc Rules:
The point of a voting bloc is to usefully organize votes such that things get done. Players will have to compromise and vote for their null reads when doing this. Discussion, however, should be free, as free discourse allows ideas to compete and the best ones to win.
When a plurality of players in a voting bloc decide to seriously vote for someone, that plurality can entreat other players in the bloc to vote the player by producing a point-by-point case against him.
Unless other players in the bloc have strong town reads on that player and can justify them, these players should join the plurality and give it strength.
This is useful to all players in the bloc, because it strengthens their voice by rendering other players amenable to compromise. However, for the efficacy of the bloc to be successful, all players must be willing to compromise on their null reads.
if someone had explained it like
this
before I would not have called the strat retarded /in
I don't like those scumslips matt pointed out but I only had time to skim through kondi's responses, so no decision on that front till tomorrow.
@shot: I didn't unvote because I haven't been on.
UNVOTE: kassadin
