Mini 1327: Murder in the Louvre- Day 6

[Vi]

Well, Marguerite thought, she'd be lucky to be back in time for the afternoon sitcoms.

"After/during the 1800s".

[Hiraki]

Well, Marguerite thought, she'd be lucky to be back in time for the afternoon sitcoms.

"After/during the 1800s".

Which applies for after

radio tech

Then again. I'm not 100% sure.

How about this:

Mod: If a flag is tricolored, does white count as a color for the purposes of this game?

In addition, I feel this whole argument is distracting.

Why won't you vote Charter Vi?

[shos]

anyone noticed how all the letters in the newspaper in post 1120 b the mod are censored, except the relevant line at the bottom and..something about a new film? do you think it's some hint hidden there? :0

how comes it's the 1800's if there are sitcoms? sitcoms=TV=after world war 2.

[Hiraki]

radio tech

I'll admit I didn't see the part about sitcoms, but that doesn't mean it's after WW2, let the mod clarify this first though.

These discussions are growing to be pointless.

[shos]

yes well, when you're hearing a lecture you don't want to hear you have some spare research time.
here are the links for the pictures the mod used:

http://s16.postimage.org/dxh0sxf0l/mona.jpg
http://s9.postimage.org/dd6wp5yen/champ.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/8fb8hy38v/louvre.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/nj9clrikt/crime_1.gif
http://s9.postimage.org/j92rt6o6n/Journal_2.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/jqh5lncnj/journal3.jpg
http://s16.postimage.org/4sbnnafkl/clue_3.gif

I really didn't get anything in the last hour or so. Nuwen - please do tell what you found out about Baal Peor?

[springlullaby]

I shan't answer Hiraki's question as I shall neither deny nor confirm that the word 'tricolour' is part of my vocabulary.

[Nuwen]

I really didn't get anything in the last hour or so. Nuwen - please do tell what you found out about Baal Peor?

Nothing at all, unless my suspicions vis a vis a jailkeep @ that rolename were correct and that accounts for the scum kill. On one hand... that was too easy. On the other hand, no one has claimed out a succesful block. Going to backburner that tangent for now. Doc shouldn't claim out his protect last night, but DO KNOW that the successful protect pretty much confirms that target as town and is invaluable. Baal Peor is the name I submitted.

We don't necessarily know that Shos' BP accounted for the lack of nightkill. Also backburnering until we have more information. I think the gambit there was ill-advised because it doesn't actually confirm anyone as scum. :s

I believe Yos' claim, especially with the extra tidbits in Shos' flavor. Shos has no reason to verify Yos' claim as scum: he could fake a guilty track, or just keep quiet and let Yos take the heat for the only successful kill last night.

My shit list is ready to be napalm'd: Vi, Katsuki, Hiraki, Zar, Charter, Furclow, kanye.

Flavor is VERY much part of this game and anyone who says otherwise is wrong, or trying to dismiss important information. The map has to be relevant, just don't know how yet.

[shos]

Yes I tried to connect the dots between the murders, the roles/rolenames we know and the place the murders happened in the museum - otherwise, why would the mod tell us that the kill was performed in room 33 ground floor? I'm positive we're missing something =\
if Hiraki is on your shitlist, vote him. my gambit wasn't a foolproof scum-outing of course, but the coincidence in hiraki's behavior...do you think they really are coincidences?

[Hiraki]

Shos. Why would I listen to a message that told me what to do?

Don't the words "trap" come to your mind?

Shit-list =/=Scum btw.

[shos]

because what it told you to do is beneficial for you, and because the message said that it comes from someone who has the same goals as you?

[Hiraki]

But the message had no note of who it was from.

[shos]

that's where the 'maybe' part comes, lol. you can either believe the writer, or not. in my opinion - in the light of the consequences - you believed, when you shouldn't have.

[Hiraki]

That's basically admitting Scum don't have a QT, something you would not know.

Unless you were scum

That's going to the point that my buddy was stupid enough to have a message but not put his name in it just because he wanted to be secret

In addition, the message even went to the point of saying "if you are town"

[shos]

...what?
first of all, scum *always* have a QT.
second, I did not say I was scum in the message - I said 'pretend that I have scum motives' or something like that.
third, even if I *were* scum and what you're saying is true, how does that 'admit' that scum don't have a QT? the message was delivered to you AT DAY. if I were indeed scum, it only 'admits' that scum don't have daytalk.

[Hiraki]

first of all, scum *always* have a QT.

Yeah. To contact at night.

second, I did not say I was scum in the message - I said 'pretend that I have scum motives' or something like that.

You blatantly say that I should pretend that you are scum.

third, even if I *were* scum and what you're saying is true, how does that 'admit' that scum don't have a QT? the message was delivered to you AT DAY. if I were indeed scum, it only 'admits' that scum don't have daytalk.

It doesn't. This is correct. I rushed that part. Still devoid of the reasoning why I didn't post this.

[shos]

no I am not saying pretend that I am scum, I am saying that MY MESSAGE told you to pretend that the sender wants scum to win.

[Vi]

Why won't you vote Charter Vi?

Because I have no reason to believe charter is scum. Do you have any reason to believe charter is scum?

The other reason is - I'm really not sure what would possess you to

imagine

highly incriminating things about shos' message that turned out to not exist.

I believe Yos' claim, especially with the extra tidbits in Shos' flavor. Shos has no reason to verify Yos' claim as scum: he could fake a guilty track, or just keep quiet and let Yos take the heat for the only successful kill last night.

I don't see shos verifying any claims anywhere.

My shit list is ready to be napalm'd: <over half the rest of the game>

But I'm genuinely impressed at how you're passing this off like it's some novel twist of scumhunting.

There is way too much going on right now that's factually or contextually WRONG.

[Vi]

You know what?

Unvote: shos
Vote: Nuwen

(L-4)

[Parama]

THAT'S NOT A VOTE FOR HIRAKI

CURSE YOU, VIIII

[charter]

I'm La Joconde, aka the mona lisa.

[Hiraki]

no I am not saying pretend that I am scum, I am saying that MY MESSAGE told you to pretend that the sender wants scum to win.

which would make the sender scum or traitor with messaging abilities

right

because this seems like a really good role to put in a game that looks decent(not trying to make fun of mod, I just don't know what the setup is obv.)

[shos]

I'm not following your point. I don't know what a traitor is, never played an independent; but why is "shostown setting a trap to newly replaced" not fitting here.?

Also, I am 'Le Artefact'.

[Vi]

THAT'S NOT A VOTE FOR HIRAKI

CURSE YOU, VIIII

You're right, it's not. Every day Nuwen posts is like a day without sunshine and every day Nuwen doesn't post is like lurking.

Not that Hiraki has any idea why I should be voting charter and he's basically acknowledged that he's making stuff up multiple times over.

Also, I'm the Louvre's mummy.

[Hiraki]

Not that Hiraki has any idea why I should be voting charter

I'm getting bumrushed sheesh.

He was my second main FoS in my catch-up post.

Look for further details.

[shos]

Also, I'm the Louvre's mummy.

Mommy I'm sick, make me tea

ahem, anyway - I really am sick, and something *might* happen tomorrow that'll make me LA for a while, 2-3 days tops. may also just be a couple of hours, long story~