Tammy wrote:Why is it interesting that I like Hez? Do you think he's my partner? What about the underlined sentence above if that's your suspicion?
Why is it interesting that I like Scott?
And no, I wouldn't say I think he is your partner, I do think if Hez is town the scum are looking at him as mislynch bait in the future and taking on an "i like this guy" early could be a way to prepare for it.
I also think a majority of his posts are shit so YOU saying you 'like him' feels like an outright lie. Could be my own biased against him though.
tammy wrote:But, I do like how you want to insult me about my scum hunting methods after you just stated that you think it's likely that I'm scum. Because if you are town who thinks I'm scum, my methods aren't the only flimsy ones around.
First off, you didn't answer my question. Second off, it wasn't an insult. If you took it that way you missed my point. Third off, Being wrong doesn't make your methods 'flimsy', having methods that can be 'dismantled' easily makes them flimsy.
Tammy wrote:Oh but you say Yates and I are the last scum. I'd like to direct you to the underlined in the first box. You would say that Yates and I have acted friendly towards one another right? We both have each other as pretty confidently town, right? So, by your logic above, how do you then put Yates and I together?
You're scum for the pushing of my lynch but jumping off. Little things like saying you'll jump off if it gets too big, keeping your vote on me for a majority of the day while contributing very little to the wagon as it grows, never being able to actually say WHY I'm scum, just that you think I am, and the whole "intent to hammer" without any actual content to go along with it (and of course not paying attention to the size of the wagon).
Yates is scum for keeping me as one of his suspects but avoiding my wagon at all costs. He says I'm not worth a vote, but says NOTHING about the people voting me. he spends these last pivotal moments of the day doing... what?, instead of pushing his own lynch candidate he merely mentions it, instead of commenting on the wagon he says there isn't enough to support he lets it go on without a care, and while he focuses on Hez's not reading the game and thus cannot make accurate reads, he ignores the actual vote hez makes never once questioning its validity.
I find the two of you to be most likely scum independent of each other. You can try and invalidate my logic via 'partnership' arguments, but those don't fly until one of you flips and I'm not stupid enough to let you break down my thinking with such an invalid point. So I'll put it as plain and simple so that even Hez could understand (if he bothered to read anything I said) I have never, nor would I ever, say you and Yates had anything close to what Scott has with V2V's wagon. They are not the same AT ALL, so my statement about "who defends their buddy that hard" does not apply to the two of you. Being friendly and calling your partner 'town' isn't "defending" in any sense of the word.