With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch and 7 to quarantine. A reminder that quarantine is locked as soon as a majority is reached.
Deadline for this day is June 23, 1630h UTC+12.
↑ Malakittens wrote:Wish I had my ROMS buddies here. I do repeat myself a lot, but that doesn't make me scummy in the least bit. I do it often, so, it's a null tell. I have always been lynched in past games for doing just that, but also due to the fact I'm just a jumpy townie. I'm usually lynched by day 2-4 for that behavior. Also yes I question everything that's my style of hunting.
↑ Espeonage wrote:
Now my claim. With a mechanic like Quarantine, I figured that everyone would be jumping to claim VT if they are in fact VT in the hope that it would mean that there is less likelihood of wasting it on someone that doesn't have a power. For the cynical ones, there are 'likely' to be goons who would also claim VT as it is the most safe claim to make, and goons also have nothing to do at night as kills are 'generally' a team thing meaning kills should go through regardless of quarantine. I want to make this point very clear so that we don't waste time early game in the case that a townie gets quarantined and scum think they're smart but no killing. This won't work until there is only 1 scum left.
↑ Espeonage wrote:
Next point: Phill, NEVER I repeat, NEVER use an RNG to choose your rvs vote. The idea of the RVS is that people can start to get reads. But by RNGing your vote you effectively skip this and instead disassociate yourself from your vote which is anti-town. I won't be following this up yet, because Mala is already doing scummy stuffs, but bear it in mind for future games. You help literally noone.
↑ Espeonage wrote:@ Mala: Self meta is unreliable at best. Also you have completely missed the rvs. If everyone treats it seriously then it is actually useful. By not trying to come up with something serious from the get go you are holding town back. Every post that someone makes can and should be put under scrutiny.
↑ Malakittens wrote: I don't really agree with pressure votes or RNG votes. It's not pro town. A bit of pressure after D2 is needed to make the lurkers start posting though.
↑ Malakittens wrote: Like I said the more posts townies make then the scum have to be forced to post. When the scums post then they are most likely to slip up with a mistake and be caught. That's the main belief I go by when playing MS/ROMS.
Espeonage wrote:
Second point: Vote: Malakittens
You have started this game in the stereotypically scummy fashion of appearing overly nervous. You have commented on absolutely everything, and you keep repeating yourself every time someone says something you have agreed with. Already yuou are exhibiting IIoA with your refusal to follow up on alot of your 'ideas' which cooinceidentally seem to fit in with the bog standard neutral reading which is another sign of trying to artificially fit in. I think that's enough for now.
↑ Phillammon wrote:I'd say it's probably more useful as a public jail, and use in a similar manner- ie, going for people we suspect to be scum to stop them making the kill,particularlyONLY in the endgame.
↑ brundibar wrote:Espeonage wrote:
Second point: Vote: Malakittens
You have started this game in the stereotypically scummy fashion of appearing overly nervous. You have commented on absolutely everything, and you keep repeating yourself every time someone says something you have agreed with. Already yuou are exhibiting IIoA with your refusal to follow up on alot of your 'ideas' which cooinceidentally seem to fit in with the bog standard neutral reading which is another sign of trying to artificially fit in. I think that's enough for now.
I'm surprised you see this as scummy, and not just newb. I'm not saying it's not scummy, but I am saying his behaviour thus far has been incredibly newbish.
↑ Espeonage wrote:↑ brundibar wrote:Espeonage wrote:
Second point: Vote: Malakittens
You have started this game in the stereotypically scummy fashion of appearing overly nervous. You have commented on absolutely everything, and you keep repeating yourself every time someone says something you have agreed with. Already yuou are exhibiting IIoA with your refusal to follow up on alot of your 'ideas' which cooinceidentally seem to fit in with the bog standard neutral reading which is another sign of trying to artificially fit in. I think that's enough for now.
I'm surprised you see this as scummy, and not just newb. I'm not saying it's not scummy, but I am saying his behaviour thus far has been incredibly newbish.
I go by the philosophy that everyone knows what they are doing until they prove themselves otherwise, simply because alot of people try to play to the I'm a newbie, it's not my fault sympathies. If you want examples I know alot of players that at least used to do this ALL the time. This is why having discernible meta is very important. I hate it when people come in to non newbie games without having played here before.
↑ Phillammon wrote:I'd say it's probably more useful as a public jail, and use in a similar manner- ie, going for people we suspect to be scum to stop them making the kill, particularly in the endgame.
↑ Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Meh. I think it's kinda stupid to jail the second suspect in hopes of stopping them from killing town. At least, that doesn't work until there is only 1 killer, since their partner(s) can just go ahead and do the kill.
↑ Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:↑ drmyshotgun wrote:Thinking image knows something we don't.
Why do you think that is a bad thing (I'm assuming you do because you voted for him right after)?