Heroes of Comedy Game Over - He who laughs last!

[PeregrineV]

WISC?

[PeregrineV]

@Jason- TML hasn't been onsite for 2 weeks. Can we request a replacement?

[Yates]

That's too bad about TML. I hadn't realized it's been 2 weeks.

[jasonT1981]

Yea, I thought I advertised for a replacement for her... Blagh, sorry getting behind on this game. Work is fucking killing me!

Edit: Replacement advertised, I will hit up a few people when I get back from work tonight.

[Scott Brosius]

I like the non-confusion theory as I feel similar not being able to get a grasp on this game. The vote on me is very weak from PV, and the initial easy wagon vote on split who he had not really mentioned previously looks bad

Vote: PeregrineV

Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but you think I am "not confused" and then say I made a "very weak" vote on you, and an "easy" vote on split.
How do you reconcile my "confidence" with "very weak" and "easy" votes?

One can be confident with weak reasoning.

So, based on the fact my reads are mostly weak-null-scum or town, I can't really push for anything with a whole lot of gusto.
Order of lynch preference
Hez
ScottBrosisus-TML-split-Vijay
Yates
Tammy
Me.

So after Hez, there is a pool of four people you would be fine lynching, yet your vote is not on Hez? Town would try to pursue their top scum read, not just list him at the top and vote elsewhere, without any effort to garner a case/votes on top scumread.

PV - 3
split -2 (certainly not until a replacement comes)

[HezLucky]

PEREV - 3 [Hez], 3 [Scott], 2 [Vijay], 1.5 [Tammy - WHICH IS REALLY TWO], 1 [Yates]
SPLIT - 3 [Tammy], 3 [Yates], 2 [Hez], 2 [Vijay], 2 [Scott]

With TML yet to say anything.

So basically, if you take out Yates it is practically even - and Yates numbers single handedly skew this shit.

TML needs to be replaced and give us one final contribution to this list.

[Yates]

Why would you discount my post? If anything, my convictions appear to be stronger than yours and based on better scum hunting. Why don't we take out YOUR vote and see that there is a clear choice?

Vote: Split

[jasonT1981]

TML and Split are being replaced. An advert has been placed for both.

[jasonT1981]

inte Replaces Split, thank you!

[inte]

page 28, really interested in this game

shame Fate had to die though

[inte]

not suprised at my role pm either

pizza was town, but hes just a really bad player imo

i should be confirmed town status based off pizza's play. no arguments about it please lets make this easy

[inte]

i'm skimming over a lot of walls fyi

[inte]

and before someones says amished

fuck you

[jasonT1981]

Vote Count 1 Day 4

Inte 4 - vijay2vansandani,Tammy, PereV,Yates,
PereV 2 - HezLucky ,Scott Brosius,
Scott B - 1 Inte

Not voting

The Mini-Librarian

Day 3 begins with 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

(expired on 2012-06-29 08:43:15)

till Day 3 Deadline

Mod Note - My apologies for slacking. Work has swamped me lately and am either in Work, watching the soccer or in bed!

[inte]

UNVOTE:

[Tammy]

LOL...I think I kind of like inte...we'll see where this goes.

ps...the amished tell is a load of crap anyway

unvote

[inte]

i actually love the amishd tell

... but pizza is too much of a bad player to say something

[Tammy]

Meh...I replaced into a game once and called Drmyshotgun a moron and people went AMISHED. It was stupid.

[Tammy]

HHHHHEEEEZZZZLUUUCKKKYYYYY - Thoughts on inte so far?

[PeregrineV]

I like the non-confusion theory as I feel similar not being able to get a grasp on this game. The vote on me is very weak from PV, and the initial easy wagon vote on split who he had not really mentioned previously looks bad

Vote: PeregrineV

Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but you think I am "not confused" and then say I made a "very weak" vote on you, and an "easy" vote on split.
How do you reconcile my "confidence" with "very weak" and "easy" votes?

One can be confident with weak reasoning.

So how is confidence determined from a weak reason?

So, based on the fact my reads are mostly weak-null-scum or town, I can't really push for anything with a whole lot of gusto.
Order of lynch preference
Hez
ScottBrosisus-TML-split-Vijay
Yates
Tammy
Me.

So after Hez, there is a pool of four people you would be fine lynching, yet your vote is not on Hez? Town would try to pursue their top scum read, not just list him at the top and vote elsewhere, without any effort to garner a case/votes on top scumread.[/quote]
It was, but sitting my vote there doing nothing was pointless. And now he's doing something, but the fact he is trying to narrow the lynch down to HIS two candidates is scummy.

Unvote: Inte

@Inte-More, please.

[Yates]

Are you guys busting my friggin balls with all these unvotes? You get me to break one of my golden rules and vote for an empty s;lot but now it's suddenly not worth voting for because someone is in it?? You're expecting inte to catch up on 42 pages of the game and make the Pizza/Split slot Town all of a sudden?

I'm going to take a second look at the unvoting. That's suspicious as hell.

[PeregrineV]

Are you guys busting my friggin balls with all these unvotes? You get me to break one of my golden rules and vote for an empty s;lot but now it's suddenly not worth voting for because someone is in it?? You're expecting inte to catch up on 42 pages of the game and make the Pizza/Split slot Town all of a sudden?

I'm going to take a second look at the unvoting. That's suspicious as hell.

Meh. Hez was given the opportunity to come in, catch up, and play. Inte can too. And if he doesn't, or is still scummy, we lynch him.

Besides, maybe a fresh voice will shake something loose.

[Tammy]

I second Pere. Someone replaced into the slot, the proper thing to do is to let them catch up and get a read on them.

[inte]

Are you guys busting my friggin balls with all these unvotes? You get me to break one of my golden rules and vote for an empty s;lot but now it's suddenly not worth voting for because someone is in it?? You're expecting inte to catch up on 42 pages of the game and make the Pizza/Split slot Town all of a sudden?

I'm going to take a second look at the unvoting. That's suspicious as hell.

this was easy, don't even need to read the rest of the game probs

VOTE: Yates

[Yates]

I second Pere. Someone replaced into the slot, the proper thing to do is to let them catch up and get a read on them.

No, this is a load of crap. What you are both telling me is that your convictions were strong enough to lynch an empty slot but as soon as someone is here to defend it you think there's a chance they can prove that the slot that you were certain is scum may actually be Town?

This isn't a question of etiquette. This is a matter of claiming to have a case against two people in the same slot. Why should it matter that a third person is in the same slot if both of the first two were scummy? This goes back to my earlier statement about why I don't like seeing people voting for vacant slots even if they were slightly scummy. This just reinforces that statement and makes me question why you were on the wagon in the first place if you are not now willing to see it through.

THIS is what makes the unvote super scummy.