↑ whispersilk wrote:
I don't respond well to blatant rudeness, especially coming from someone who apparently ISO'd me for his case. Open your eyes and try reading for real this time. I'm not doing your leg work on a case against myself.
If I would have seen a plan, I wouldn't have asked you. It's just not there.
Nothing to say against your case?
Where is the headbanging smilie?
I just spent an hour refuting every single aspect of your ridiculous case on me point by point. Are you fucking stoned?
That's not a "refutation".
↑ whispersilk wrote:
That was in response to a question that MoI asked everyone. Did you expect me not to answer just because the answer should have been obvious?
[...}
Which part?
Again, it was in response to
DCLXVI, because I wanted him to understand the flaw in his statement. What is scummy about that?
[...]
Did you call out the
other 2 people that said the exact same thing on the very first page
after
I made my post for stating the obvious and being repetative?
Again, that was in
response to someone, and not a random post made to keep up appearances.
[...]
The first part was
in response to the person that voted for me. So how is it not beneficial for me to give my reasons? The second part was a response to a question put forth by the same person in the same post. How is pointing out a rule to someone who wanted to limit people's choice of tile in a way that could greatly benefit scum a bad thing?
All that stuff is irrelevant. I wasn't criticizing for doing that, I was criticizing you not doing anything but that.
My post directed at LLD was in no way an attack and was hardly too long. I just stated my thoughts politely, and in fact I agreed with aspects of her reasoning while disagreeing with her methods. I also shared my thoughts on how she should have presented her plan differently, instead of trying to force people into following. Can you be a little less vague with your accusation and specify where I am "re-capping" everyone else's arguments with the quotes to prove it? Thanks.
Again: irrelevant. LLD's plan was already dead; no point in writing paragraphs about it.
My plan was
based on using logic and deduction to catch scum
, and yet you still don't understand that despite what Hoopla said and my full explanation in the post you're referring to.
No, I said null at best when referring to 3 people. That means at least one of them was a scum read.
Responded above.
What part of
Hoopla's post do you not understand? She was obviously referring to my plan and not every single post I had made up till that point, and she was the one that called it "logic puzzling", not me.
Irrelevant. Not my point.
Really? I think I've refuted the latter part of your post. I put forth my own plan for debate and didn't get much response. I've stated that I have a town read on Amrun, and null-scum reads on the other 3 on Arugulas wagon. When I have firm reads on everyone else, I'll post them. Where are your reads on everyone?
See above.
I don't want to follow any plan, because it's too late to do so for any of them. Who is "following" your plan? It seems to me that most people are doing whatever they want, if they haven't semi-followed another plan already and messed up any chance of following yours successfully. I'm not getting involved in useless debates about plans that cannot work at this point.
Again, a cop-out. I ask you for the plan you posted, you reply with fluff.
---
↑ Arugula wrote:
Why is Hoopla's plan bad? Is that enough to lynch her?
Because she missed that:
↑ IceGuy wrote: ↑ Hoopla wrote:
I know Magna's exact hand now because of him floating his interest and I think I know yours now as well. Any half intelligent scum are capable of putting the pieces together.
And any half intelligent town is capable of choosing his choices so even more-than-half intelligent scum can't reconstruct the hand.
And yes,
repeatedly
pushing bad plans, especially when you should know better, is a scumtell.
And yes, I did read Amrun's posts. DID YOU SEE THE WHOLE ARGUMENT WE HAD? Obviously you didn't see it or you would have known that.
I also read them. It's just that I don't read them as town, and nobody can sincerely say they read it as town. If you have a townread on her it's because she's a safe townread for town because always appears town in the beginning.
