T-Bone wrote:Just for the record. I think Greenknight's reasoning for finding Zang scummy is wrong. I don't think being wrong is scummy. Therefore being wrong doesn't equal being scum. I commented on Triangle because he voted after Greenknight made a post explaining his actions, and I felt nothing scummy coming from Greenknight. Acomist and CMAR voted well before my posts, so stop trying to misrepresent my attack.
I get wrong =/= scummy, but this only means you are saying wrong = acceptable. For someone who say nothing else in the game worth commenting on, this is a pretty hard thing to accept.
Also, no one missrepresented you, if anything they missunderstood you but that's hardly the same thing. Resorting to trying to finger them for a wrongness is a far reaching over reaction mate. You said 'Triangle was the only one to vote' which is wrong, and someone mentioned that. What you meant was "Triangle was the only one to vote after me" so it's your own fault for being misunderstood.
Lastly, are you claiming your comment against Triangle was meant as an attack?
T-Bone wrote:Tl:DR version. Korlash is scum for, voting me without ever having a stated real reason other than a hunch, then proceeding to try and get more votes for me as if he made a case, to outright begging for votes. This reeks of scum trying to avoid the major wagons because he knows he won't get a lynch on me without a real push (which he won't make).
Avoid the major wagons? Last time I checked I was heavily into a lot of that discussion regardless of where my vote was. That's hardly avoiding them. And begging for votes on you? You've been more or less a brick wall I've been trying to talk to. I've spent most of this game waiting for you to respond to something I asked you or commented towards you. I think it's well within my right to ask the plethora of people who have claimed they also think you 'scummy' to vote in an attempt to get you more interested.
(Also, pssst... The only 'major wagon' you've been 'involved in' was the one where you simply made a fake vote and then ran away... People in glass houses mate... I forget the rest but it ends with me laughing and a tear welling up in your eye... I think it's for the best I forget it, eh?)
T-Bone wrote:I'm not gonna beg for votes. I think people should really look at what Korlash is doing, not just with what I pointed out, but also his stances on the leading wagons. To me, it all looks like fake-scumhunting. Especially when it comes to the Jason wagon.
Actually this could be legitimate. I could see how some people might get the wrong idea when looking at my stuff on Jason, I welcome the chance to go into it more if people feel the need for me to. You might want to cool it with the 'fake scumhunting' though mate, it's not going to end well for you. This post off yours is proof enough my 'scumhunting' bore fruits.
T-Bone wrote:That's good posting, and if it weren't for people thinking bad reasoning = equals scum, this would probably be the leading wagon. So, why are people avoiding this wagon? It seems to have died down on page 4. The take away point from Tierce is that Jason took the opportunity presented by GreyIce to make the situation more confusing, and I agree that isn't protown. I'm not even sure how the Jason discussion became about fencesitting, because the issue I see with Jason is not the fencesitting, but in fact the stance he took on the GreyIce/Zang ordeal. According to #88, Korlash brought up the non-existant issue of fencesitting. Though maybe someone else brought it up before him, I'm not looking that deep. It bothers me that Jason is defending against fencesitting as opposed to what he was doing in regards to GreyIce/Zang that made him scummy.
Excuse me for a moment... *walks outside* *laughter is heard echoing through the halls*
Ok, So you haven't actually looked into the Jason wagon at all. You're simply backing it so you can avoid being on Green. From my point of view, Green is likely town so scum wouldn't want to rush onto that sinking ship, it's too early in the game to speed out a mislynch. Pushing Jason is the far safer path, and you even manage to avoid voting him. Pretty clever, but ultimately damning.
See if you had been paying attention to the Jason wagon you would know it was Teirce that brought up the fence sitting and that at this point, it's pretty much the only thing on him. That is why the wagon died down, because the whole 'case' was simply 'a fence sit on the ICE/Zang' ordeal which isn't that scummy. You would also know the fence sit was about the Zang/ICe ordeal, which you just said was the best thing about his wagon... So you've just gone in a circle saying you don't like the biggest point against him, but you think the best thing against him is the (our words) fence sitting...
Lastly, You use it to throw more misinformation at me. Blaming me for something you call bad (to make me look worse) but ultimately was the same thing you called good (makes you look worse).
This whole thing is fake, Jason is town (90% sure of it) and you're scum (95% sure of it).
Here, answer this "What was Jason's stance that he took on the GreyIce/Zang ordeal, and why is it bad (scummy)?" Now, you're stuck trying to answer that in such a way that what you say isn't equatable to 'he fence sat'... Good luck mate, this is your one chance to prove all this you just posted wasn't fake... and I have no faith you're going to be able to do it.
Hate his guts still. 
