@2for1
– You need to revote Ice-scum since the Mod didn’t count your vote from Agent Ireland.
--
DCL wrote: Maybe because armun did the collect without a flip around post 80ish. Discussion on what was the best way to handle flips had not finished.
The timing isn’t as important as the reaoning and apparent motivation given that Amrun specifically stated in
Post 84 that she was cognizant that what she was doing wasn’t going to be met with approval (given she specifically called all presented plans Anti-Town).
She specifically went out of her way to thumb her nose at all plans presented and go against the grain. And for the same reasoning 2for1 game to boot.
So again – why did that not earn a Town read from you?
--
AV wrote: In other news, who wants to lynch Vijay with me?
His vote on Arugula was certainly bad. I'd rather lynch Ice-scum first since he's the most obvious.
Why did you not respond to my “What does Iceguy-scum do to your reads”?
--
Iceguy wrote:Links. Now.
Icescum – Why are you ignoring the person who started the wagon?
Post 522 –
He's basically saying "that was a scum-driven derail and new wagon,
but neither the person starting it
nor the people ending it are scum".
I’ve bolded it for you. Please feel free to illustrate who you are trying to say started the wagon since you basically are dodging and weaving whenever someone tries to get you to clarify the point. Who started the wagon that you claim I am ignoring? That way I can show AGAIN how your statement in 522 was fabricated.
Oh wait I see
Post 580 and the following gem –
Iceguy wrote:Actually, DCL was the original wagon starter
So you are admitting that in 522 when you claimed I was not calling the wagon starter scum in
Post 468 is a complete fabrication as DCL was indeed clearly on that list.
I appreciate you admitting to being fabricating scum! Eat rope!!!!!
Icescum – Well it is irrelevant blah blah blah
Post 567 –
Who originally started the wagon is irrelevant –
This is why I know you are scum just hoping to score points instead of actually scum-hunting. Because it was easy to find those.
Iceguy wrote: Yes, I have them as suspects. None of them have been my top suspects at one point - of course, I've posted reads, but you've decided to ignore them.
You claiming it's scummy to not vote all of one's suspects is ridiculous and shows at which kind of straws you're already grasping.
I’ll tackle the second point first – you are misrepping my point. I’m stating you claim to have scum reads on those people who pushed both you and Arugula. Yet you haven’t voted them and certainly haven’t done any scum-hunting in regards to them. Where are your questions to them about why they voted you and him?
Links. Now.
As to the first part let’s look at your ‘reads’ that you claim I was ignoring –
Iceguy in 342 wrote: Other scum reads: Robocopter
Leaning scum: LLD, Voided
Neutral or need to post more: Amrun, 2m1s, vijay, DCL
Unfortunately probably town: MoI, Hoopla, whisper
Town: AV
This is the last time you posted a ‘reads list’. Now you are claiming that you have scum reads in those players who voted for both you and Arugula. Well your scum reads are
Arugula (flipped Town), Robocopter, LLD, and Voided.
LLD doesn’t meet that criteria – she’s cast a single vote for Hoopla this game.
Robocopter doesn’t meet that criteria – he’s never voted for you.
Voided is the only player in this list who voted for both Arugula and yourself.
Yet you aren’t pushing him in any way. You simply sit playing reactively to his posts.
And to head off what I see as your response – I don’t meet the criteria either as my vote on Arugula came very early in the Day. I certainly wasn’t part of his mislynch … as we know I clearly was trying to lynch scum-you.
So no – I haven’t ignored your reads. I’m just calling them what they are – fabrications from scum who can’t actually scum-hunt in an open game with only 1 scum faction.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
