Ok, will be waiting. Meanwhile i had time to do an ISO on
Acosmist
. My read is neutral, slightly leaning scum. It is more like a general impression and disagreements over certain actions and players.
His vote was on greenknight from RVS, yet the reason why it stayed there he gave only after being questioned about it. The reason itself feels like exaggeration to me: "greenknight is freaking out about GreyICE. Seems like he wanted to railroad Zang and use GreyICE's "claim" as an excuse. Then the rug was pulled out from under him.". Using a strange/illogical tell may be viewed as scummy (personal choice for everyone), but using it to railroad? If greenknight didn't believe his own tell, do you think he thought that 4 other players will find it a good scum tell and quicklynch Zang? So, either he believed his own tell, and then his vote was pretty normal, adding pressure to scum read, or he didn't believe it, didn't expect others to believe it, then it was some kind of pushing or reaction test, but not railroading. Anyway, that's my personal opinion about the "railroad" thing, and for all i know Acosmist may believe it, like green believed his tell.
I don't like that
wall on T-Bone, after so many previous concise posts. I finally managed to read through it, following all the quotes and links, and feel that this was overreaction, and don't see the reason for this. The comment on T-Bone
post 127 is way off (misunderstanding?), the rest of the answers are factually true, still there were more sarcasm than facts. To be fair, T-Bone also misread
post 141, since Acosmist was talking to Starbuck there, not greenknight (about the "point stands", etc). Maybe you two should reread each other and reassess your reads?