History Mafia Mini Theme - 1358 Game Over!
Forum rules
- DeasVail
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivor
- DeasVail
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12813
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Canberra, Australia
- Staeg
-
Staeg Mafia Scum
- Staeg
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3078
- Joined: April 19, 2011
- Location: Latvia
- Bitmap
-
Bitmap Jack of All Trades
- Bitmap
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8962
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: Somewhere
- MattP
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- MattP
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
- Nexus
-
Nexus Hemiss
- Nexus
He- miss
- miss
- Posts: 6599
- Joined: July 1, 2010
- Pronoun: He
- Location: Living rent free
- Bitmap
-
Bitmap Jack of All Trades
- Bitmap
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8962
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: Somewhere
Alright, I'm going to give some input on the 666 vote. I think it's a good wagon and something about his posting is off.
I find it extremely odd that he was one of the first two people to assume I was town when most people had gut reads of scum on me and they ended up dying and flipping town. It just seemed he had the innate knowledge that I was already town so that if I was to get lynched, he could look innocent. I saw this in one of my games where the scum buddies up one of the noob town in order to try to win their favor and vote.
Also, the miller claim was really off. Why would he claim it this early? And his strong pressure on Iceguy seems scummy."I give up on trying to read you. You're unimaginably scummy, with a dose of ultra-Town thrown in for spice."- MattP
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- MattP
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
This is LATE to claim if anything.
My gut tells me that him waiting to claim it makes it true, but I am having difficulty voicing why.
I think that it's protown in that...I don't know, it just doesn't feel like scum would do this.
You know what, it's because miller is supposed to be claimed in your first post and it's too stupid not too, it's not calculating enough and it therefore comes from town.SlappyKrust- Shamrock
-
Shamrock Mafia Scum
- Shamrock
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: November 13, 2005
- DCLXVI
-
DCLXVI Mafia Scum
- DCLXVI
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3461
- Joined: March 8, 2012
- Location: Somewhere in the central timezone
I wasn't the first person to call you town, as far as I remember. I first called you town after the whole sig thing, and that was after several other players called you town for it.
Anyway, I've been gone all day (spent 13 hours at an amusement park with friends.)which is why I haven't been on MS all day.I have to work tomorrow morning so going to bed now.
If you can wait till tomorrow afternoon I'll post more then.Sarcasm isnota scumtell.- Shamrock
-
Shamrock Mafia Scum
- Shamrock
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: November 13, 2005
- MichelSableheart
-
MichelSableheart Mafia Scum
- MichelSableheart
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: May 31, 2007
- Location: Netherlands
@MattP: actually, I think beginning of day 2 is a very good moment for scum to claim miller. They still preempt a cop claim, while giving scumbuddies more room to hide. Also, the "it's stupid play so it doesn't come from scum" argument is bogus. Town have no reason to play stupid either. Making stupid plays is a player tell, not an alignement tell IMO. Also, scum can WIFOM (they'll never think I'll make this stupid play as scum).There is no 'a' in Michel.- IceGuy
-
IceGuy Mafia Scum
- IceGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3390
- Joined: January 29, 2011
I think he just feared a cop investigating him N1.- DeasVail
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivor
- DeasVail
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12813
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Hmm, why would DCL be more scared of a cop investigation after Night 1 than before Night 1?
Technically, I think it is more pro-scum for DCL to claim now, because of the possibility of a cop investigating him N1 (when with a D1 miller claim, that would not happen). However, I'm not sure that this is a good indication of DCL's alignment.
I do have a question for DCL though. Can you point me to any experience/reading that influenced your decision to claim on Day 2 as opposed to Day 1? Sorry if this has already been asked.
I will work out my reads this weekend, but at this time I'm not happy with lynching DCL.- DCLXVI
-
DCLXVI Mafia Scum
- DCLXVI
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3461
- Joined: March 8, 2012
- Location: Somewhere in the central timezone
Just a heads up, I'm going to be gone again from 2pm-10pm us central time for work. Having two summer jobs kind of sucks, but it pays for college...
This is what I was able to get through, I was hoping to get through everything, but I'll post more when I'm done with work.
Don't worry, I didn't see it as bad, I should have said something about not being able to post yesterday. I can see why you would have been impatient.
I never said I would be "sad" to be nightkilled as a miller. Please don't misrep me.
This is a multi-ball game. No towncred for catching scum unfortunately.
I've done that in my ISO. MULTIPLE TIMES, I really don't want to go and have to do it again. Requests for a "case" on ICE are getting kind of annoying as I feel I have already explained it.
↑ Shamrock wrote:I do like the DCL wagon.I found his aggressive press on IceGuy at the end of D1 to be pretty scummyand Michel raises a good point about the plausibility of his claim, not to mention that we lose little even if he is telling the truth. I also missed his reasoning on waiting until D2 to claim, which is bizarre and I'd love to hear an explanation of why scum would want to take out a miller (or were you worrying about being vigged?) as well as an explanation of hisscumread on IceGuy whichI don't buy at all and whichI haven't seen him explain anywhere.
These two bold parts contradict each other.
In the first part, shamrock says he noticed my push on ICEguy and considered the push scummy. If he had paid enough attention to my push to notice it (and find it scummy) then he would have clearly noticed why I find ICEguy scummy. Yet he goes on to say he does not know why I suspect ICEguy.
I fully explained my scumread of ICEguy during my push on him day 1. To have shamrock claim he saw the push, and yet didn't see the case is a bunch of BS.
---------
Why I chose to claim day 2 instead of day 1:
-Claiming at the beginning just ends up in a quick auto-death a day-1 lynch or night 1 kill in which I end up not really doing much and being useless.
-I figured the odds of a pr getting off n2 were greater than one getting offed n1 so a later claim could potentially be better for taking attention away from town power roles.
-It also worked very nicely as a reaction test. I'll explain more later (I'm really running out of time right now) but one big thing that came out of this is that staeg is definately town because of how he reacted to my claim.
So basically I figured a later claim would be better because it would get more information for the town than a day 1 claim. It would better protect other power roles than claiming earlier and basically would let me be more useful in this role. I knew before deciding to do this that it isn't what's normally done, but I figured it was worth a try for the reason I've given.
Honestly, getting run up to L-1 was not what I expected from claiming. I didn't think everyone would believe it, but this still wasn't exactly what I was anticipating happening.
----------
why the claim does fit with the game.
One point that was brought, was that the flavor of it didn't make sense.
While player alignment may not be determined by the role name (joan of arc flipped scum) abilities still seem to be consistent with roleclaims (marco polo being a tracker)
So Julius Caeser being a miller doesn't seem inconsistant with the way the setup was designed.
Also I actually kind of breadcrumbed this info day 1.
-----------
Now to the existance of a miller in the setup.
Obviously we know that a tracker flipped. Which does make it seem unlikely for a miller, there are two reasons I think my role could have been put in for.
1. To cause uncertainty about the tracker claim. Nexus probably expected the miller to claim day 1 which would have made a tracker claim by quilford a little unbelievable. In other words, a miller was added to the setup to weaken the tracker role a little. Certainly a different way to do it but that seems to me to be the most likely possibility.
2. There is a cop in the setup. This seems op but could work if the SK was immune to track and if there is a godfather like role. Under those circumstances two investigation roles would not be OP, but I think the first explanation sounds more likely.
Ok, this is all I can say for now. I'll be back with more later.Sarcasm isnota scumtell.- Staeg
-
Staeg Mafia Scum
- Staeg
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3078
- Joined: April 19, 2011
- Location: Latvia
666, pretend that I'm retarded and walk me through your thought process.
Who would kill you N1 if you claimed D1? Did you expect to be lynched if you claimed D1 (provide examples of games where you've seen this happen), and if so, what would stop you from being lynched D2? What if a cop investigated you N1?lmao Fate = Jake from State Farm & Pisskop- Shamrock
-
Shamrock Mafia Scum
- Shamrock
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: November 13, 2005
Ok, I looked through your ISO one more time. Is the post you are referring to?
↑ DCLXVI wrote:OK, I get that you are saying it is a benefit risk decision.
The risk is obvious, the fact that you have claimed being a pr means you will be dead or role blocked tomorrow, I would be shocked if neither of those things happened.
I just can't see anything that could offset that risk.What possible benefit could counter out that risk?
The answer is none,which is why I just can't see you as town right now.
This seems like a totally bogus argument to base the entirety of your scumread on, which is why I assumed you had some other reason. As I already said:
So is there some other reason or is that it? Because I'm not buying that at all.Two chainz, four bracelets. Let me see that ass clap, standing ovation.- Shamrock
-
Shamrock Mafia Scum
- Shamrock
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: November 13, 2005
- DeasVail
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivor
- DeasVail
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12813
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Canberra, Australia
I kind of think DCL is town.
Regarding Michel,
I think I have quite a decent scumread on him now. The main things are:
-There's the rolefishing accusation, when I feel that Michel never really considered whether scum would actually so blatantly rolefish and was instead just using it as fake scumhunting fuel. I find the following quote very unconvincing as well.
I know that I am terrible at finding powerroles as scum myself. I also don't have experience with scum rolefishing in the sense that I could not point to a particular post in a finished game and quote a scum quicktopic to prove that the player in question was clearly rolefishing. Still, there are various way in which you can enter a discussion regarding powerroles, and encouraging other players to give info away is not a pro-town one.
-I find 565, where Michel thinks he hammers McStab to be very scummy as well, with the way he presents a list of acceptable lynches and reasoning and his content before that. If he did indeed feel that time was running out, why would he not just say something along the lines of "Hey, let's lynch McStab because we're running out of time" rather than posting lots of stuff and presenting acceptable lynches, only to say "may as well hammer McStab" at the end when the opportunity appears to arise. The whole *hammering without a claim* thing affirms my belief that the hammer (or what he thought was one) appeared to be an attempt to distance from McStab and it doesn't match with his actual post (particularly the part suggesting there were multiple lynch options), which I feel was more of an attempt to look town than what would come from a townie.
~~
I also find Shamrock scummy for similar reasons as Day 1, but also his sudden support for a McStab lynch in 543 looks like it could be an attempt to distance. His accusation of me deflecting a McStab lynch, with no further mention, is scummy too.- MichelSableheart
-
MichelSableheart Mafia Scum
- MichelSableheart
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: May 31, 2007
- Location: Netherlands
You do realize that the rolefishing accusation was made on page 2, when there is still relatively little information to go on, and any chance to get a discussion on who's scum started should be taken? Of course accusations will feel a bit forced there. I still believe that CO's is the most suspicious reaction to IceGuy's proposal because it seems intended to do setup speculation rather then determine whether the proposal was good, which is more likely to come from scum then from town IMO. If the conversation happened this way now, though, I probably would drop the word blatant and just call it rolefishing.DeasVail wrote:-There's the rolefishing accusation, when I feel that Michel never really considered whether scum would actually so blatantly rolefish and was instead just using it as fake scumhunting fuel.
I must admit that you are partially right with this accusation; the hammer does indeed not fit with the rest of the post. The L-1 was placed as I was writing. Originally, my post concluded that out of the viable bandwagons, McStab's was the largest, placed the L-1 vote, and called that we should make sure to get a lynch. On preview, I believed that L-1 had already been placed, so I edited the end of my post to reflect that. The fact that I was hammering became suddenly more important then why I chose McStab out of my acceptable lynches, which causes the discrepancy between the vote and the rest of my post you're noticing.DeasVail wrote:-I find 565, where Michel thinks he hammers McStab to be very scummy as well, with the way he presents a list of acceptable lynches and reasoning and his content before that. If he did indeed feel that time was running out, why would he not just say something along the lines of "Hey, let's lynch McStab because we're running out of time" rather than posting lots of stuff and presenting acceptable lynches, only to say "may as well hammer McStab" at the end when the opportunity appears to arise. The whole *hammering without a claim* thing affirms my belief that the hammer (or what he thought was one) appeared to be an attempt to distance from McStab and it doesn't match with his actual post (particularly the part suggesting there were multiple lynch options), which I feel was more of an attempt to look town than what would come from a townie.There is no 'a' in Michel.- DeasVail
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivor
- DeasVail
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12813
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Regarding the first point, you're saying that my argument is made less valid by the fact that it was page 2, but your mention of it in your hammer post indicates a greater significance than what you imply in this latest post.
Onto the second, I realised that the L-1 vote must have occurred after you started your post, but the main things I find scummy (which probably weren't well expressed) are:
-Your presentation of acceptable lynches + reasoning (as well as other content), while prepared to commit to the McStab wagon when time was running out (which you were evidently aware of), seems a lot to me like scum trying to look pro-town, rather than town trying to organise getting a lynch. When town has decided to bring McStab to L-1, I don't expect them to give reasons for other scumreads as well, especially when McStab was obviously the leading wagon. I can easily see scum doing this however, in an effort to demonstrate town scumhunting.- IceGuy
-
IceGuy Mafia Scum
- IceGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3390
- Joined: January 29, 2011
Because daycops are much less common than standard cops.
How do you know that?
SCUMSLIP
Yes, I know two kills happened, but that could mean that there is a mafia and an SK, a mafia and a vig, and some other weird power role interactions. You claiming it's a multiball game after only one night of two kills reads like you know it from your role PM.
↑ DCLXVI wrote:
In the first part, shamrock says he noticed my push on ICEguy and considered the push scummy. If he had paid enough attention to my push to notice it (and find it scummy) then he would have clearly noticed why I find ICEguy scummy. Yet he goes on to say he does not know why I suspect ICEguy.
I fully explained my scumread of ICEguy during my push on him day 1. To have shamrock claim he saw the push, and yet didn't see the case is a bunch of BS.
That's not a contradiction. He saw the push but not the reason for it.
-Claiming at the beginning just ends up in a quick auto-death a day-1 lynch or night 1 kill in which I end up not really doing much and being useless.
-I figured the odds of a pr getting off n2 were greater than one getting offed n1 so a later claim could potentially be better for taking attention away from town power roles.
-It also worked very nicely as a reaction test. I'll explain more later (I'm really running out of time right now) but one big thing that came out of this is that staeg is definately town because of how he reacted to my claim.
Millers generally don't get lynched D1 and don't get killed N1 because a miller claim is both believable enough to not get lynched and attackable and essentially worthless enough to not get killed. On the other hand, claiming miller on D2 means a cop could've wasted an investigation on you N1.
One point that was brought, was that the flavor of it didn't make sense.
While player alignment may not be determined by the role name (joan of arc flipped scum) abilities still seem to be consistent with roleclaims (marco polo being a tracker)
So Julius Caeser being a miller doesn't seem inconsistant with the way the setup was designed.
Earlier you claimed this:
↑ DCLXVI wrote:
The flavor should be obvious to anyone with a middle school knowledge of history. Why I claimed is also fairly obvious. But I'll explain to make sure you get it.
Flavor, I'm viewed as a bad guy cause I got rid of the roman senate and made myself a dictator. But I actually saved Rome so in reality I'm a good guy , comprende?
That's not a breadcrumb. - IceGuy
- DeasVail
- MichelSableheart
- DeasVail
- Shamrock
- Shamrock
- Staeg
- DCLXVI
- DeasVail
- IceGuy
- MichelSableheart
- Shamrock
- DCLXVI
- Shamrock
- MattP
- Bitmap
- Nexus
- MattP
- Bitmap
- Staeg
- DeasVail