↑ absta101 wrote:@username
- Why does it have to be in his own words?
here's how it went down:
- i do a thing
- disturbed one makes a post, does not say anything about the thing i did being scummy
- someone else says the thing i did was scummy
- disturbed one says the thing i did was scummy
- iceninja does a thing
- disturbed one makes a post, does not say anything about the thing iceninja did being scummy
- someone else says the thing he did was scummy
- disturbed one says the thing he did was scummy
basically, he seemed to just be parroting other people's arguments, so i wanted him to explain them in his own words to prove he could actually demonstrate an understanding of the opinions he claims to hold.
i don't find his responses particularly satisfying.
↑ Disturbed_One wrote:you were all like "Let's go hunt the scum", which seems weird because it goes without saying that we should be hunting and lynching scum. It kind of read to me like "Oh look guys, I'm so town."
this summation of my first post is pretty much a total fabrication and feels like it is reciting something he's seen before in a different game as opposed to being a an actual thought that stemmed from anything i actually posted.
↑ Disturbed_One wrote:ICEninja is scummy because he was trying to discourage the vote on himself with bad reasoning. McStab said an explanation was forthcoming, so it was obvious it was not a meaningless vote. Seemed kind of a like a nervous "Oh, he doesn't have a reason for voting me, so I'm not scummy at all."
to be fair, this one doesn't particularly feel made up after the fact, it just doesn't demonstrate any actual scummy behaviour from iceninja. there's really nothing scummy about trying to discourage a vote on oneself, regardless of how good the reasoning is, and the thought he puts into iceninja's head doesn't sound like a scum thought at all.
↑ Disturbed_One wrote:Also his indirect support of pretty much every wagon without actually voting on the wagons is pretty scummy. It means he's okay with a mislynch, he just doesn't want to be caught on a wagon that ends up in a mislynch.
iceninja had, at the time of this post, voiced support for two (2) wagons, mine and jmo's, both of which he has, in fact, voted for.
disturbed one had voiced support for three (3) wagons, mine, iceninja's and jmo's, only two of which he has voted for.
as you might have noticed, the set of {wagons supported by iceninja} is completely contained within the set of {wagons supported by disturbed one}. so it's pretty rich for him to use this as evidence that iceninja is "okay with a mislynch".
i mean, what disturbed one is saying here is that jmo, who he has previously described as "obvscum", and who he was still voting at the time of this post, would be a mislynch. these are his words, not mine.
