you know how sometimes you fall a bit behind on a game, so you start writing a catch-up post but don't finish it for whatever reason, and then when you come back to finish it a whole lot more stuff has happened and all the stuff you've already typed seems kind of irrelevant, so you start over, and basically you just keep doing that over and over in an endless cycle.
don't do that. forget the minutae and just focus on the one or two most important occurences. in this case, that's obviously the Bacde wagon, which is a bad wagon.
Bacde's case on Nacho is hella dumb, but there's no scum motivation behind it. scum don't just randomly bail on a popular wagon to bullheadedly attack one of the most experienced players in the game against massive resistance on all sides. that is very much the behaviour of a town player who is convinced they've caught scum and can't understand why no one else sees what they see.
UNVOTE: Jabberwock
the way Dire_Drenz replaced out definitely looks town, and Jabberwock feels town to me in spite of the fact that i disagree with basically everything they've said.
VOTE: Mirhawk
case in point. there is scum to be found on the Bacde wagon, that's a no brainer. Disturbed_One remains an excellent candidate, for sure, but i've been getting some nagging gut rot reading Mirhawk's recent posts.
↑ Mirhawk wrote:To be perfectly honest, I read it a second time. It seemed strong the first time I read it, but upon refection the particular points Nacho had seemed rather weak. I still think its non-contradictory, and an okay post in general, but his case isn't very compelling.
i'm just having real trouble buying this. look at the time stamps.
Dec 1st, 2:20 AM (your timezone may vary)
↑ Mirhawk wrote: His initial case against bacde was well supported and I feel nothing he has said since then has in any way contradicted his earlier statements.
Dec 1st, 4:43 AM
↑ Mirhawk wrote:
I must admit however, I am colored on this because as I read the exchange Nacho ripped everything you said apart. In my eyes this makes Nacho look better and you worse. This doesn't take into account the fact that Nacho might just be better at debate. Nothing Nacho has said make him look particularly like town or scum in my eyes.
Dec 1st, 4:57 AM
↑ Mirhawk wrote:Nacho's original case on you was quite bad, and in fact until you started responding to Nacho's claims I had a town read on you.
when exactly in the two and a half hours between posts 183 and 189 did Mirhawk go back and read Nacho's initial case again? and what exactly prompted it? i don't know about you, but when i see someone make a "well-supported" case and proceed to "rip apart" everything the defendant says, my first instinct is definitely not to go back and scrutinize the original case and check that my initial assesment of its well-supportedness was correct. and if i did do that, i'm pretty sure i'd mention in some way that i'd done it, and not just state that the original case was bad as if that was what i'd thought the whole time? idk, maybe that's just me.
some other bits that give me minor indigestion:
↑ Mirhawk wrote:Unvote
Sorry about that ICE, I've just been using you as a parking lot. I haven't entertained any serious notions of you being scum since page five.
find it very strange that he personally adresses iceninja here, when most everything else he's posted, especially with regards to his vote, has been third person. feels like an attempt to build some false camaraderie with iceninja. probably not a
deliberate
attempt; i don't think he's made a meticulously thought out devious plan to address iceninja in the second person in order to win his trust or anything. but i do think it could be an unconscious revelation of his true motivations.
↑ Mirhawk wrote:Nacho hasn't done anything anti-town.
why 'anti-town' rather than 'scummy'? strikes me as a really odd choice of words in the situation.
↑ Mirhawk wrote:I can't accept this reasoning unless you can explain why town-Mirhawk
wouldn't
make this comment.
bit of a 'caught me for the wrong reasons'-style tell here; this statement implies that there is a reasoning to call Mirhawk scum that he
would
accept.
...maybe i've just found it.