↑ Smashbard wrote:Haven't had a chance to do my wagon analysis yet. Just thought I would chime in.
Mykonian: If you feel that Dyrnify is the second scummiest person, how do you justify him hammering early yesterday when he could of just waited for me to hammer?
Is Nacho solely scummy because he's gotten a bit wordy? I don't have a large sample size of playing with Nacho, but it seems like he just naturally posts walls.
I know replacing out is not necessarily an indicator of scumminess, but I do want to put it out there that I find it really suspicious that Xegar & Kitie both replaced out in quick succession of one another. Especially the KitieKat slot. It makes me feel like Kat just got tired of answering questions from Nacho without getting any headway in deterring suspicions of scumminess. At least Xegar admitted to being genuinely busy.
I will finally decide on a vote after my wagon analysis from Day 1 is done.
I didn't get to the hammer. That's cool. No, he's nr1 scum for the post I've quoted him 3 times now and for which he can't give me a motivation.
Nah, I know how to make gummibear posts. That's a gummibear post. I'd make it if I knew I could get away with it. Nobody can actually attack you for saying the stuff there, because it's actually quite hard to prove someone is scum for the cases they make. Nacho could probably argue till worlds end that his case on Katie is believable. Doesn't mean it's right.
And lengthy is fine. Lengthy about "she's perhaps possible a bit on the passive side, I think". And yes I'm paraphrasing and using a hyperbole. It's still a gummibear post.
