Would you mind explaining to me me a situation where you feel like lying as town is a good idea? The fact that you reply to Nekoko's comment saying:
Makes me even more curious, because you're "avoiding" a question so quickly into the first day.
↑ Spawnisen wrote:↑ serrapaladin wrote:
We'll see about that. Your vote was conscious/serious enough for you to realize its hypocrisy, while Nekoko's and mine were firmly RVS.
Can you tell me why Nekokos vote on MP5 is more RVS than mine. Because he added a bullshit reason for the vote? But yeah, obviously me trying to explain my voting and posts is going no where so i'll just shut up for the time being.
↑ serrapaladin wrote:Are you a native English speaker? And what different platforms do you use to write posts?
↑ awestfie wrote:
Regardless of that, I feel like Spawnisen had a very bad start so far, two of his answers out of the five we were asked during the pregame are making me quite curious.
I cannot think of many moments where town would try to outright lie about something; the only real time where lying as town could be beneficial would be if you're trying to draw a reaction. Although, I don't want to discuss about the pregame answers too much, I feel like you need to explain why you answered that question the way you did.
↑ Untrod Tripod wrote:VC
↑ serrapaladin wrote:
I'm not particularly happy with this line of going after Spawnisen byawestfie. My objections are along the lines of kwll's comment:
Also a slight hint of wagoning on Spawnisen by going after him a slightly different way to Nekoko and me.
↑ Spawnisen wrote:
Me saying that i'm claiming townie means pretty much nothing. Don't worry! I can still be cop, jailkeeper, scum. I'm just confusing you all!
With that said,
vote:nekokofor being the first one to start stacking up votes on one person (Yes I'm aware that makes me the second guy...)
↑ awestfie wrote:
Now, I don't see anything wrong with this, I've reviewed roughly about five other Newbie games and,sometimes a VT can choose to claim very early into day 1 to try and draw a reaction, and if anything; it's beneficial for town, because the reactions people will give gives town a lot of information, but, it is a very high-risk, high-reward strategy, because it can backfire; as some people will think that claiming very early like that is a scum-tell, because it can look as if you're a desperate scum trying to look townie, by claiming.
However, the biggest issue I have with all of this, is this:
I see two things here, either:
A) You got defensive really quickly.
or
B) You feel like your pregame answers didn't matter all that much.
A is pretty self explanatory really.
As for B, well.. it's perfectly understandable, it's early into day 1, however, we don't really have much to go on right now, and your answers made a few people curious, including me, serrapaladin and Nekoko.
Anyways, for now I will VOTE: Spawnisen - I'd like to get some answers from you, as I am quite curious.
↑ awestfie wrote:The issue I have here, is that Spawnisen says that him claiming townie means "pretty much nothing;" when, he soft claimed that he was a VT, just to go on and say that he could still be a PR or Scum. Confusing people isn't townie, and if anything it's a scum-tell.Now, the only logical reasons why he could be doing all of this, would be because he's trying to get reactions, and that's why I want him to reply to my concerns, because it will give town a lot of information.
↑ serrapaladin wrote:Are you a native English speaker?
↑ serrapaladin wrote:And what different platforms do you use to write posts?
↑ serrapaladin wrote:↑ awestfie wrote:
Now, I don't see anything wrong with this, I've reviewed roughly about five other Newbie games and,sometimes a VT can choose to claim very early into day 1 to try and draw a reaction, and if anything; it's beneficial for town, because the reactions people will give gives town a lot of information, but, it is a very high-risk, high-reward strategy, because it can backfire; as some people will think that claiming very early like that is a scum-tell, because it can look as if you're a desperate scum trying to look townie, by claiming.
However, the biggest issue I have with all of this, is this:
I see two things here, either:
A) You got defensive really quickly.
or
B) You feel like your pregame answers didn't matter all that much.
A is pretty self explanatory really.
As for B, well.. it's perfectly understandable, it's early into day 1, however, we don't really have much to go on right now, and your answers made a few people curious, including me, serrapaladin and Nekoko.
Anyways, for now I will VOTE: Spawnisen - I'd like to get some answers from you, as I am quite curious.
The bold parts reads as though you're trying to giveyour scumbuddySpawnisen a way out. You're basically serving him some more or less decent excuses, which heshouldbe thinking of by himself. If you think those might be the reasons, why not probe for them more subtly? Him replying to your leading questions will precisely not give town any good information. To address kwll's point, my concern about bandwagoning wasn't because you were adding questions, but because you jumped on with a vote on Spawnisen, while giving a plausible town explanation for his behavior.
awestfie:Would you mind linking to some of those examples of VT claiming D1, under no pressure, with the explicit reason of drawing out reactions from scum?
Anyone else:I must admit my ignorance, I haven't heard of this alleged tactic. Could anyone back her up, so I don't believe it was a reason pulled out of thin air to help her scumbuddy?
↑ serrapaladin wrote:↑ awestfie wrote:The issue I have here, is that Spawnisen says that him claiming townie means "pretty much nothing;" when, he soft claimed that he was a VT, just to go on and say that he could still be a PR or Scum. Confusing people isn't townie, and if anything it's a scum-tell.Now, the only logical reasons why he could be doing all of this, would be because he's trying to get reactions, and that's why I want him to reply to my concerns, because it will give town a lot of information.
Well no, the logical reason for him doing all of this would be 'him being scum'...
↑ serrapaladin wrote:
Also, please explain this to me. If you see nothing wrong with it, how could you understand my unhappiness?
Why are you replying without reading my whole posts?↑ kwll wrote:
ummm....so You want a bandwagon on a townie or You know they are townie and you want a bandwagon?
Not liking this one at all.
[/SE hat on]
I would highly suggest you look at the links the IC gave out, also I would read on how gameflow goes in this type of mafia. Random questions and Random votes are design to get reactions randomly so we can begin discussions. [/se hat off]
I may have been willing to forgive some of it to new players...but WOW...that one sounds kinda messed up.
Spawnisen (3): kwll, awestfie, Superdeclan
MP5 (1): Nekoko
Superdeclan (1): serrapaladin
kwll (1): MP5
Nekoko (2): Ser Arthur Dayne, Spawnisen
Not Voting (1): FalconPunch
MP5 -> kwll
serrapaladin -> MP5
Ser Arthur Dayne -> Nekoko
kwll -> Spawnisen
Nekoko -> MP5
Spawnisen -> Nekoko
serrapaladin unvotes
serrapaladin -> Declan
awestfie -> Spawnisen
Superdeclan -> Spawnisen
↑ serrapaladin wrote:Also my vote isn't really doing anything, so:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Declan
until you get an avatar.
↑ serrapaladin wrote:Anyone else: I must admit my ignorance, I haven't heard of this alleged tactic. Could anyone back her up, so I don't believe it was a reason pulled out of thin air to help her scumbuddy?
↑ serrapaladin wrote:Are you a native English speaker? And what different platforms do you use to write posts?
↑ serrapaladin wrote:Falcon:
Given you have played this before, what gives you the impression might be the worst player?
↑ Spawnisen wrote:Why are you replying without reading my whole posts?
I said FOR Nekoko it might be an oppurtunity to get a small bandwagongoing on a townie. I never said it was ME who wanted to get a bandwagon going.
This is kinda useless if you all just expect me to be scum without reading my posts objectively. I'm not gonna defend myself anymore. You got my explanation, at least read it before you vote on me.