Meta Playstyle Mafia(Game Over, Town Wins!)

The Acting Method · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:17 pm

I'm softclaiming Maestro? please explain.

Maestro · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:18 pm

↑ The Acting Method wrote:Nope Bitmap, I'm not scum, However my gameplay does have to do with my role

THIS IS A SOFTCLAIM

roflcopter · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:19 pm

fos: the acting method

Bitmap · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:20 pm

↑ The Acting Method wrote:I'm softclaiming Maestro? please explain.

TAM.

You contributed nothing. Absolutely nothing. You've posted barely anything and you've been only answering questions that have been directed at you. Even I, a survivor who isn't even town, is contributing and being more town than you.

Bitmap · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:23 pm

Oh hey, I've made a case against you.

VOTE: The Acting Method

Step up the activity and actually scumhunt.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:26 pm

↑ Bitmap wrote:

Bitmap · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:29 pm

↑ Voidedmafia wrote:

Listen, half of the players are useless. chk apparently knows that Nacho is scum somehow probably through his role. And the bandwagon on me is just you. So vote Nacho and stop being stubborn on a wagon that isn't going to take off.

Venmar · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:30 pm

↑ Bitmap wrote:@Om of the Nom: Yo you should listen to this:

I prefer this:

The Acting Method · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:31 pm

So what role would I be soft claiming in that scenario. Honestly bitmap I haven't had much to say, I can't give much game related content because pretty much all of day one was (jumble of random phrases and accusations all at once.) Though Chkflip please give a reason why Nachomamma should be our lynch for today, I do have agreement with Voided that I don't really see a decent case against him.

Bitmap · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:32 pm

↑ Venmar wrote:
↑ Bitmap wrote:@Om of the Nom: Yo you should listen to this:

I prefer this:

Fixed.

MattP · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:33 pm

Rofl is faking his restriction

It's bastard it can't be real

So much drama today

Bitmap · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:37 pm

↑ MattP wrote:Rofl is faking his restriction

It's bastard it can't be real

So much drama today

I think rofl's restriction is real.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:38 pm

I told you guys Bitmap wasn't town :P
VOTE: Nacho

MattP · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:45 pm

I'd ask you why bitmap but I don't really care

TheTrollie · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:46 pm

↑ Bitmap wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:You only would make sense with your way of claiming that you're survivor or jester

I'd like to see you night killed

no way bitmap is jester. Don't jester's only win if they are lynched? claiming miller is begging to be vigged--ok, i guess survivor doesn't make sense either then...nvm

↑ Maenara wrote:Not gonna get the Trollie thing done tonight.

Void, it's plenty clear: Chkwhateverhisnameis allegedly has a role-based reason for thinking (Or, in his words, knowing) that Nacho is scum. That means that, with virtual certainty, one of them is.

what makes u think chk has any info about nacho's scum-ness? I just ISOd him and i didn't get any sign that that was the case.

Bitmap · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:47 pm

↑ MattP wrote:I'd ask you why bitmap but I don't really care

I'm very sad you feel this way.

Om of the Nom wrote:I told you guys Bitmap wasn't town
VOTE: Nacho

TheTrollie · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:49 pm

awww...lets try that again

↑ Bitmap wrote:

MattP · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:49 pm

The ONLY thing not pointing at bitmap being jester is that he admitted his miller claim was a lie when it was proven that he or Lurker was lying, because as miller he would ride on that for a lynch, AND jesters are bastard

MattP · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:50 pm

I don't get why you're still trying to "generate content", Trollie

Like seriously fucking LOL

TheTrollie · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:51 pm

↑ MattP wrote:The ONLY thing not pointing at bitmap being jester is that he admitted his miller claim was a lie when it was proven that he or Lurker was lying, because as
miller

jester
he would ride on that for a lynch, AND jesters are bastard

ur right

p-edit: rly? we r gonna go at this again? shut up and realize that maybe ur not so great at reading me n' all

Bitmap · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:51 pm

↑ MattP wrote:The ONLY thing not pointing at bitmap being jester is that he admitted his miller claim was a lie when it was proven that he or Lurker was lying, because as miller he would ride on that for a lynch, AND jesters are bastard

Whatever floats your boat, Matt.

MattP wrote:I don't get why you're still trying to "generate content", Trollie

Like seriously fucking LOL

I think Trollie is town.

Bitmap · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:55 pm

Actually, I wonder if we even do have a town vig. No one died at all last night and I was pretty sure either me or Lurker was going to get shot. OH GOODIE GOOD GOOD.

TheTrollie · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:05 pm

↑ Bitmap wrote:Actually, I wonder if we even do have a town vig. No one died at all last night and I was pretty sure either me or Lurker was going to get shot. OH GOODIE GOOD GOOD.

u claimed 1-shot BP. how do u know u werent shot?

TheTrollie · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:07 pm

I am still waiting on someone to answer VM regarding the case on Nacho...

Bitmap · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:08 pm

↑ TheTrollie wrote:
↑ Bitmap wrote:Actually, I wonder if we even do have a town vig. No one died at all last night and I was pretty sure either me or Lurker was going to get shot. OH GOODIE GOOD GOOD.

u claimed 1-shot BP. how do u know u werent shot?

Because I would get told that.