I'm interpreting this: post 227 as Baby Spice being coming off as genuine + gut.... Someone correct me if I'm wrong here.
↑ sottyrulez wrote:I find post 125 pretty scummy. Just the support of both of the underwhelming Nostredeus and Shadow wagons is all kinds of blegh.
That's an interesting point (gonna iso TGAH, thought I was reading him town)
Good question.
Guess I wasn't thinking there, and just trying to engage in convo's.
Where was this, I've wanted to do that forever, but sadly I don't Hydra. There was a game where all the Hydra did was post partner conversations... they were universally accepted as town. I was scum (think I had to NK them)
↑ Plessiezarus wrote:Not quite as bad as the people who are voting SAD because of his RP, but close
Outside of SafetyDance, who else voted SAD for RP?
↑ Plessiezarus wrote:Don't think much of the wagon on Nostrodeus. The name-claim suggestion sounds more like a sign of inexperience (either in Farday-modded games in particular or Large Theme games in general), and the rest of his posts seem consistent with this.
Ditto this.
inb4itoldyouso
↑ Plessiezarus wrote:
Overexplained in the sense that, once he said he was sheeping Benmage and voting because of the "annoying" RP, the comment about SAD's avatar seem redundant? Like, why say that at all unless you're worried your vote might be seen as too unoriginal? ("Overexplained" doesn't mean "not lazy".)
Don't really care that he didn't comment on the "major topics of discussion", since ... yeah, they were boring.
I think taking both views makes it pretty bad for Safety.
-You have him ignoring most discussion.
-You have a shit vote, with shittier explanations (this clearly isn't an rvs vote... but the reason is piss poor)
---As I said before, scum sometimes have difficulty genuinely interjecting themselves into a game.
I'm baffled at naming a 3 man scum team this early.
At first I thought the snide remark to Tammy in iso 1, was a form of buddying. I’ve had scum try and be cute to me in their first post.... The fact that he admits being snide in post 135 threw me a little bit..Though is overall lack of contribution led to my early suspicion, and wasn’t really alleviated until his recent posting which looks a lot better with actual apparent review.
↑ Benmage wrote:↑ petapan wrote:↑ The Mini-Librarian wrote:Not liking peta (not engaged in the game, coasting through)
i just have no idea what i'm doing
Can you link to a previous game where you felt that the game was above you? You have over 2300 posts on the site, and frankly I don't believe you.
**I want to take a look at the Shadow wagon, how it sprung up, the Nost hate and review Jason... But I have a meeting in about 30 mins.