... well, I can see the pattern you suggest in the first four linked games, and the last. Don't really see it in
NY 157 though? And
Micro 49 is such a weird, short game (a double-elimination game that ended in forty posts, then had to be restarted with new roles) that I'm reluctant to even think about using it as a data point. Abarat does fit the pattern though, as I said. Hmm. I'm really not sure what to think, actually.
This is something we (that is, Zar and I) will have to argue about, I guess. Still happier with McStab, TGAH, abtra or Jason for the time being, but I'll try to make time to look for more Petapan games (ideally seeing if I can reliably guess his alignment this way). His posts are the sort I tend to dismiss/skim, anyway, so this will be good practice for me in reading that sort of playstyle.
↑ ChannelDelibird wrote: ↑ Plessiezarus wrote:But if you
had
to pick one of them as scum, which would you pick?
This is such a weird question to ask. Why did you ask this, Pless?
I think I explained this in
496? I find it odd that SAD, who has interacted with both SD and absta, felt the need to comment on ML's "don't you think absta looks scummier than SD?" post just to insist he had no read at all on either.
↑ absta101 wrote:Also,
#419 looks like he's just jumped on McStab because a few players were saying "hmm, McStab is lynchable".
Throwing in the connection with Plezz (as if she's conf scum) is another terrible move that seems more 'opportunistic' than 'genuine'
.
Don't think I agree with this. It would have looked much more opportunsitic if camn had gone "oh, wait, ignore my case on Plessizarus [sic]! they're innocent, McStab is scum!". It's natural for town, I think, to want to hold on to their scum-reads. Easier for scum, who never really believed in them anyway, to throw them away when they don't seem to be going anywhere.
↑ absta101 wrote:SaD is harder to read (null).
SAD is definitely a pain to read.
↑ Ser Arthur Dayne wrote: ↑ absta101 wrote:You know what?
VOTE: Camn
I'm sick and tired of his fucking bull shit.
4. Camn really hasn't been "bullshitting".
You think Camn is right that hydra self-referencing is a scum-tell?
(Or, since that doesn't really convey my bemusement properly:
you
think
hydra self-referencing is a scum-tell?
)
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Nearly 100% McStab would flip town after reading him in ISO like I said in one of my recent posts.
What do you see in McStab's posts that makes you read him as town? (Let alone "nearly 100% town", which I'm assuming is just hyperbole.)
↑ Shadoweh wrote:BT, after the rant about camn being scum and commenting that she jumped onto McStab right after Plessie, don't you think its hypocritical that your very next post is checking out the McStab wagon?
BT didn't suggest camn was scum simply because she suspected McStab. He claimed it was suspicious that camn joined a wagon
started by her claimed top-scum read
. But BT doesn't have a scum-read on us. So I'm not seeing the hypocrisy here at all?
↑ McStab wrote:Alright time to plow through the shit arguments out there. Can someone, perhaps BT (I find his posts to be the most eloquent of my detractors) please outline, in bullet point form, the points against me?
If you've read BT, and found his posts against you "the most eloquent", why not just reply directly to those posts?
↑ Cerulean wrote:I know some people are town reading him for the gambit, but it reads fake to me.
The "gambit" is just ... ugh. It's not so much that it sounds "fake", it's that it doesn't read anything like a real gambit inteded to do anything -- in context, it's clear by the time of the "gambit" that people - including Jason - have already said enough that the "gambit" can't possibly work. Doesn't feel like something worth building a read on at all.
↑ Cerulean wrote:What I also think is scummy is his complete sidestepping of the real issues people have voiced against him. He repeatedly keeps saying stuff about how we think he's scumm for wall posting, when the point has been brought up that
it's that his wall posts contain very little content and appear to just be commenting on things to look busy but are trivial
.
The bolded is the problem we have with Jason, yes.
↑ Cerulean wrote:I feel like he's going "how can you think I'm scummy I haven't even done anything scummy yet.".
This is the sense I get from McStab's latest posts, too.
~ Pless