BrightEyedFish wrote:I was just agreeing with MrZepher. I understand that you think it is "bad logic" but to answer your question, I do believe my vote was based more on a gut feeling than on the actual act of bandwagoning. Or maybe it was just the bandwagoning was conducted.
It's early and things will probably change... but at this time I stand by my vote.
Let me explain why it is bad
Player X votes player Z
Player Y votes player Z
You are calling Player Y scum based on an action that Player X has also done, not to mention wagoning means less vote splitting and more pressure on people, meaning tells are more likely to come out which is of course the whole reasoning for scumhunting.
↑ A Muffin wrote:Right now I don't really have suspicions. I feel that basing huge decisions off the RVS stage isn't a great idea. Gut feelings are fibe, but two votes on the same person in the RVS doesn't mean much. Just my two cents.
So you think if someone does something really scummy in RVS no-one should look at it just cause it's RVS?
How is a gut feeling a legit reason over reasoning based on RVS?
You guys all realize that what you's are stating just isn't logical right?
Cyber is basically saying what I'm saying.