reham and all the others who think MrZepher is scummy but won't vote him, can you at least TRY to find a second suspect to put your vote on so your vote isn't just wasted space and not doing half a shit for scumhunting?
UNVOTE:
I vote for lynching MrZepher. Lynching him would reveal some information that would be useful in D2.
It would point out that BrightEyedFish is a potential scum as MrZepher's defense of him, calling him town when there is no conclusive evidence, is preemptive.
I also thought of the idea of a scum voting on the last two votes, after JasonWazza pointed it out to be a bad idea for scum, to be a possible move for a scum to hide suspicion.
And also, his claiming of a PR when his actions are attracting too much attention, something PR's should be careful of.
BUT, if MrZepher turns out to be a VT or JK, we shouldn't return to RVS as there are a few leads to whom may be the scum
(either BrightEyedFish for the opportunist vote, though this is just a single reason and somewhat weak
JasonWazza for suggesting going back to RVS when there are possible alternatives. Maybe he knows that he becomes a probable suspect when MrZepher flips a pro-town role, and suggesting a return to RVS so that all suspicions would be restarted. NOTE: This based on the belief that RVS means purely randomly voting and that no suspicions are yet aroused.
Cybertronix for lurking, he hasn't reacted yet when he said he's gonna catch up, however we live in different timezones so my sense of time is different from his)
I will vote for MrZepher the moment everybody has agreed...
But for the meantime, I will vote for
VOTE: BrightEyedFish
as MrZepher's defense of him was sudden, calling him town when BrightEyedFish messages seems to be the same as the others.
And his opportunist vote which could be a possible scum move as explained earlier.
Can I also ask a claim from BrightEyedFish?