↑ JasonWazza wrote:Yeah and both of the scenarios we still ended up just lynching the JK just later.
No we dont, in atleast some we should be lynching the JK "protect".
↑ JasonWazza wrote:Yeah and both of the scenarios we still ended up just lynching the JK just later.
↑ JasonWazza wrote:keep barreling down into a lynch that he knows will flip a PR
↑ JasonWazza wrote:Cyber isn't a noob he has at least 2 games, but yes i do understand what you are saying but that wouldn't make it a viable strategy in the thought that one of the noobs might think of that.
↑ JasonWazza wrote:Anyone would think we had the great wall of china in this thread >.>
Also Sven, I am right, i know that for certain.
↑ Svenskt Stål wrote:↑ JasonWazza wrote:Anyone would think we had the great wall of china in this thread >.>
Also Sven, I am right, i know that for certain.
You are about as right as snow in July.
I want to shift our discussion in another more productive direction, can you give me a update read list where you list us 6 in terms of "trust".
↑ JasonWazza wrote:↑ Svenskt Stål wrote:↑ Ms Marangal wrote:I'm on page 7 and I'm already fairly convinced that Jason is scum. all I did was skim through, but he did a bucket load of IIoA (yeah, I get you're IC, but you do have to scum hunt too) and pushed some pretty bad stuff IMO and I'm still baffled as to why you decided to continue the claimed JK, the reason you used was intense as fuck WIFOM
The more I think about this the more I think you are right. If player A claims to be jailkeeper uncontested you dont lynch that person, the mafia will kill him at night. If player A is still alive the next day then you lynch him, an experienced player should know this.
This is Mafia WIFOM
Think of it this way, Mafia procedds to not kill the Jailkeeper and we just have a WIFOMic ball of crap and a delayed mislynch.
Not to mention even more WIFOMic crap with the fact that the "JK" may have blocked the Night Kill or saved the target and there comes a crap load more WIFOM.
Not to mention that it's the best Mafia sided fake claim cause they can cause a mislynch from a fake block and still be considered town.
And the fact that again 6/7 still wanted the lynch to go through, clearly the optimal lynch was Mr Z
↑ JasonWazza wrote:OK lets assume instead of lynching MrZ we didn't
Lynch of a VT Day 1
Night 1 no kill
Day 2 lynch JK
That's one possibility
Lynch of a VT day 1
Night 1 no kill
JK's "protect" gets lynched and flips VT
Night 2 Kill another VT
Day 3 Lynch the claimed JK
See the problem with these things?
↑ JasonWazza wrote:Yeah and both of the scenarios we still ended up just lynching the JK just later.
↑ JasonWazza wrote:Also i'm pointing out the reasons why lynching is right.
Yes you can read things but it ends up being WIFOM.
↑ JasonWazza wrote:Sven your a smart guy tell me this, Would a scum, even a very strong one, keep barreling down into a lynch that he knows will flip a PR?
Especially knowing that this backlash is likely.
Sven wrote:BrightEyedFish
My most riliable town read, he was also the top townie for MrZepher who we know was a villager. I have been agreeing with his thoughtprocess in most posts.
MrZ wrote:If I die today and flip town there are several people you can look at:
Captain Ribbit
BrightEyedFish
JasonWazza
↑ BrightEyedFish wrote:With the info I received from Jason's 63 my mind has been changed and I will be removing my vote.
UNVOTE: Xtian
As of right now, I do not feel comfortable putting any of them at L-1.
↑ BrightEyedFish wrote:A hammer is never a definite scumtell, and that is why I did not put up a vote. Typically after a mislynch, I start with who threw in the hammer and work my way backwards and see if anything sticks out to me in hindsight.