↑ PeregrineV wrote: ↑ Knight of Cydonia wrote:That seems kinda a reach for this early in a game... I don't even particularly like meta cases at any point in a game, but this early just feels somewhat off.
@Angelius: have both heads posted, or is this just Arc/just Nero so far?
So you don't like meta cases, which are mostly completely subjective anyway, and, in addition, bork's meta case feels "off"? Like, he shouldn't be able to produce it, or he produced it badly, or he's wrong, or you want him to think he's wrong?
I think presenting a meta case at any point in a game is silly because a competent player is perfectly capable of manipulating their own meta and recognising their own playstyles. However I'm willing to accept that other people consider it valid scumhunting.
That said, pushing a meta case on a hydra is especially difficult unless both heads are signing off their posts with which head is doing the talking, and doing so this early in a game, when most people are still, to put it simply, shitposting/RVSing, is, yes, "off" to me.
Ideally, I'd like to know which head is posting from our hydras at all times, but especially in this case since bork's suggestion is based on only one head of that particular hydra. I'd also prefer if he came back to doing meta reads later in the game when everyone has a substantive body of posting, which we don't have right now.
