↑ Human Destroyer wrote:I'm relatively sure RBs don't work on RBs
I'm relatively sure they do.
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:I'm relatively sure RBs don't work on RBs
↑ SafetyDance wrote:So shouldn't we focus on NS then since he is you know...claiming a role blocker
↑ SafetyDance wrote:Beli is not claiming RB
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:↑ SafetyDance wrote:Beli is not claiming RB
I know but my point is NS could've roleblocked the Mafia RBer and it would've had no effect
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:
Natural Action Resolution dictates it I think.
I might be wrong on my interpretation of it though.
Suppose Roleblocker A blocks Roleblocker B, who blocks Roleblocker C, who blocks Roleblocker D, who blocks Doctor E. If Roleblocks are resolved in such a way that conflicts are minimized, A blocks B, preventing B from blocking C, thus C blocks D, preventing D from blocking the Doctor - in short, the Doctor's protection would have an effect. If all Roleblocks are simultaneous, the only player who is NOT technically Roleblocked is A; the Doctor would be blocked.
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:
Natural Action Resolution dictates it I think.
I might be wrong on my interpretation of it though.
↑ ac1983fan wrote:UNVOTE:
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:↑ SafetyDance wrote:Beli is not claiming RB
I know but my point is NS could've roleblocked the Mafia RBer and it would've had no effect
There's nothing in the Roleblocker role PM which indicates this.
With that being said, I think i see your logic now...I think what we actually have is one of the following situations:
1) Beli, Nobody Special, and POPC are all town
2) Two of POPC, Beli, and Nobody Special are scum.
Now, if the case is 1, and making the assumption that HD was being truthful, that means we drew MMCCVB?. If the ? is a T, then there would be a serial killer present; but this is unlikely, seeing as we have had two consecutive nights with only one nightkill (and the claimed blocker claimed to not have used his action N1). So the ? would almost certainly be another non-T; which means that, if 1 is true and HD is being truthful, there needs to be at least one other power role out there. Alternatively, 1 could be true but HD could be scum, which would give us MMCCBTT, which is consistent with all flips so far.
On the other hand, if 2 is true, then HD must be being truthful as there are no more slots for scum. So, assuming there is not a serial killer because a preponderance of the evidence points to that conclusion) our draws would have to be either MMVTTCC (assuming Beli is the truther); MMVTTB? (assuming NS is truth-telling); or one of MMVTT?? or MMV???? (? is non-T).
Now my logic could be erroneous and the assumption that there is no SK MIGHT be unfounded...But I think 1 is fairly likely to be true; I also think that if 2 is true, then Beli is probably the truth-teller of the group.
With that being said...An easy way to check this situation is to lynch one of POPC, Beli, and NS; of the three NS is the "lynch of least resistance" because he has seemingly not really been trying at all - but I don't know that that is the "best use" of a day.
I'm not sure how to proceed, frankly.
Then he proceeds to vote Safety, who had also been focusing on NS (or on connections with NS? I didn't really understand it, and neither did anyone else as far as I could see).
Here and elsewhere, he milks the meta argument as a reason to avoid lynching NS regardless of his alignment.