Open 488: Pick Your Poison [GAME OVER]

[xtopherusD]

Vote Count 1-2

kcudz

- 3
(fuzzybutternut, Siveure DtTrikyp, AngryPidgeon)

---

AngryPidgeon

- 2
(uctriton00, Bacde)

Shisou

- 2
(PimHel, kcudz)

Antagon

- 1
(baboon)

fuzzybutternut

- 1
(Scott Brosius)

Not Voting

- 4
(Antagon, Keybladewielder, Shisou, theslimer3)

7 to lynch

Deadline in (expired on 2013-04-17 19:10:21)

Note:

Keybladewielder and uctriton are on V/LA.
This vote count is accurate up to post #175 only.

(i.e. Bacde's unvote isn't reflected here)

[Bacde]

Unvote

I'm not seeing Kcudz flailing

on the contrary, he seems to be baby stepping

[kcudz]

Also, a post has to have some town motivation, or it wouldn't get posted, even by scum.

This line of reasoning is...not helpful by any means. Genuine motivation is extremely difficult to be faked, especially by a non-veteran; in this case, Shisou. I'd say your vote is bad, but I'm not too interested in being called out for some buzz word along the tracks of "OMGUS".

Kcudz is flailing and counterwagoning Shisou.

1) This is falsified hyperbole to incriminate me. 2) You're chronologically altering events to make me seem more reprehensible for what I've done than I actually am. There was one vote on me before I voted Shisou, meaning A) the wagon on me is a counterwagon to Shisou and B) you are counterwagoning me.

[baboon]

I could see a kcudz-angrypidgeon scumteam.

[kcudz]

Your vote doesn't reflect that.

[baboon]

Unvote, vote: kcudz

FTFY

[kcudz]

Do you think AP and I are scummy in an associative manner, or individually so?

[baboon]

Both. I had considered both of you scummy for a while, but your most recent post tipped me off.

[kcudz]

What is it about the post that's particularly indicative of scum? Can you elaborate on how our interactions depict us as scum partners?

[baboon]

What do you think?

[kcudz]

I'm asking you.

[baboon]

You presume angrypidgeon is guilty (implied in your posts), which is inconsistent with your voting record.

[kcudz]

Where I have implied he is guilty?

[kcudz]

While you're answering that:

Can you elaborate on how our interactions depict us as scum partners?

[theslimer3]

...are you reading what you type?

Lol


Why does everything I read seem like crap?
The hell is this game?

[PimHel]

VOTE: kcudz

Also, a post has to have some town motivation, or it wouldn't get posted, even by scum.

Interesting....
If you believe this, can you point out what Cudz's motivation could be and why you think it's more likely coming from scum-Cudz?

For players who care, I like Cudz. I don't agree with all his logic, but he's on the right track with Shisou and Trikyp.

Baboon went down quickly. Not voting one of his top suspects (which Cudz pointed out) to change it later. Yet attacking Cudz for not voting AP (Baboon saw Cudz suspecting AP), while Cudz is voting a player he thinks is suspicious.
So Baboon. Want to explain why Cudz is scummy for that?

[Siveure DtTrikyp]

Trikyp? Lol

Anyway yeah, that was a really REALLY bad/lazy vote. But idk who else to vote.

[Scott Brosius]

kcudz reads as town. His unwillingness to talk about experience is a bag of null imo.

Your vote doesn't reflect that.

This catch leads me to lean town though, scum usually don't bother to pay attention to these kinds of things.
Also baboon looks bad in that exchange, throwing out half-hearted reads, trying to deflect explaining them by saying "what do you think"

Unvote
Vote: baboon

And I'm not scum AP get the hell off

Going to reread the new pages tomorrow

Weird defensive comment. Mental note for later.

[Antagon]

Spoiler: Reads

AP is town:

VOTE: uctriton
Because his questions are dangerously close to outing me as

mafia

UCT is mafia. Vote him and thank me later.

AP at least gets some town cred for expressing his disapproval of RQS.

Baboon is town because hes doing his own thing and clearly doesnt give a shit what people make of his post.

I've made 2 posts, one of which was a random vote. How does that entail me "not giving a shit?" I disagree btw, and I think you have a tendency to jump to conclusions.

I tend to vocalize thoughts as they come to me and worry about whether I make sense later

-You poked at fuzzy
-You aren't trying to fit in or act natural
-You are questioning a townread on you (now)
-Openly encouraging RVS. Often scum try to make a big fuss about how they are being pro-town by ending RVS early.

AP is also following his own guidelines. He doesn't care what other people think and posts what he think.

kcudz is town.

Do you think AP and I are scummy in an associative manner, or individually so?

What is it about the post that's particularly indicative of scum? Can you elaborate on how our interactions depict us as scum partners?

Even when confronted with a bandwagon, kcudz doesn't assert his townieness by attacking the bandwagon proposers, but instead asks questions and attempts to scumhunt. I believe that his reaction is genuine.

Uct is scum:

RQS is never a good idea unless you want to find out information about the other players. Asking if they're Mafia doesn't do anything substantial.

Hint: RQS never goes anywhere.

And I'm not scum AP get the hell off

Going to reread the new pages tomorrow

Scott Brosius is correct. Saying you're not scum is fairly obvious. You might as well start attempting to scumhunt instead of trying to defend yourself.

baboon is scum:

You have at least some indication that you're active, but you still keep your RVS vote on even after it's virtually agreed that RVS is over.

I could see a kcudz-angrypidgeon scumteam.

You make a large assumption that these two people are scum, yet you only provide one post to back it up.

VOTE: baboon

[xtopherusD]

Shisou is immediately replaced by FuDuzn. Welcome to the game!

[FuDuzn]

Howdy, will give this game a good read through and make a catch up post possibly tonight or maybe tomorrow.

[FuDuzn]

Oh man, after a quick read through my head hurts. Kcudz, you are something else....you make my head hurt more then anyone else.

I could see a kcudz-angrypidgeon scumteam.

Really? And unless I missed it I didn't see any viable explanation for this reasoning.
VOTE: Baboon

[kcudz]

There's something about your vote I don't like - I support the agenda to which it is pursuing, but the paraphrased, echoed reason you provided is...lackluster. Doesn't seem genuine. Maybe I'm just biased by your predecessor. I'll keep my vote here for now; your slot is a far more pressing issue in my opinion.

[FuDuzn]

Fair enough, can't turn back time(cue that Cher song).

But, what do you mean by the 'paraphrased, echoed reason' that I provided?

[AngryPidgeon]

TIL FuDuzn is in this game.